Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
ferritic ductile iron
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 775 Search Results for
ferritic ductile iron
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 88 Ductile-to-brittle transition in an annealed ferritic ductile iron (same alloy as in Fig. 83 and 84 ). Above demarcation line is region of dimpled rupture (the ductile fracture surface of the test sample after partial fracture at room temperature). Below line is region of quasi
More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 2 Ductile and brittle fracture surface of ferritic ductile iron specimens (ASTM A536, 100-40-18 grade, annealed) generated by impact testing at different temperatures. (a) –20 °C (–4 °F)/72 kJ/m 2 . (b) 60 °C (140 °F)/200 kJ/m 2 . Source: Ref 9
More
Image
Published: 01 June 2024
Fig. 9 Ductile fracture in ferritic ductile iron illustrating very high nodule density, since the plane of fracture follows from nodule to nodule, exposing many more nodules than are visible in a single plane of polish. (a), 152×; (b), 769×. Courtesy of Element Materials Technology-Wixom
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 20 Comparison of fracture toughness of fully ferritic ductile iron (GGG-40) with ferritic ductile iron with 15% pearlite in matrix (S-45). Source: Ref 5
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 97 Brittle cleavage fracture in ferritic ductile iron. SEM, 1000× (W.L. Bradley, Texas A&M University)
More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 14 Fracture surface of ferritic ductile iron (ASTM 100-40-18 grade, annealed) samples broken by impact at –20 °C (–4 °F). Different magnifications. Source: Ref 9
More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 16 Typical fracture surfaces of ferritic ductile iron (ASTM A536, 100-40-18 grade, annealed) produced by impact loading. (a) Fracture surfaces generated at 20 °C, or 68 °F (within the transition temperature range). (b) Detail of cleavage facets and the river pattern formation. Source
More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Image
Published: 01 June 2024
Fig. 6 Fracture appearance of tensile specimen of a ferritic ductile iron with dark-colored fracture (dimple rupture) essentially throughout the fracture face. Courtesy of Element Materials Technology-Wixom. Source: Ref 12
More
Image
Published: 01 June 2024
Fig. 11 High-magnification view of internodular area of ferritic ductile iron at room temperature. SEM, ≈ 1900×. Reprinted with permission from the American Foundry Society. Source: Ref 14
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 15 Dynamic tear energy versus silicon content for two ferritic ductile irons. Test temperature was 25 °C (75 °F). Phosphorus content was 0.01%. Specimen size: 190 mm (7 1 2 in.) long, 130 mm (5 1 8 in.) wide, and 41 mm (1 5 8 in.) thick; 13 mm ( 1 2
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 92 Fracture surface of a ferritic-pearlitic ductile iron. Note ductile fracture of ferrite in matrix around nodules and cleavage (brittle) fracture of pearlite in matrix. SEM, 50× (W.L. Bradley, Texas A&M University)
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 1 Microstructures of ductile iron. (a) As-cast ferritic. (b) As-cast pearlitic; hardness, 255 HB. (c) Ferritic, annealed 3 h at 700 °C (1290 °F). (d) Pearlitic ductile iron oil quenched and tempered to 255 HB. All etched in 2% nital. 100×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 25 Stress-rupture properties of ductile iron: (a) Ferritic (annealed). (b) Pearlitic (normalized). The curve labeled creep shows the stress-temperature combination that will result in a creep rate of 0.0001%/h. Source: Ref 15 , 16
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 84 Ductile iron. Ferritic matrix. The casting was annealed at 900 °C (1650 °F), held 2 h, quick furnace cooled to 730 °C (1345 °F), slow furnace cooled to 600 °C (1110 °F), and air cooled. Etched with 4% nital. 100×
More
Image
Published: 01 October 2014
Fig. 3 Optical Micrographs of ductile iron (a) ferritic matrix produced by intercritically austenizing at 732 °C (1350 °F) for 5 hours, cooling 10 °C (50 °F) per hour to 538 °C (1000 °F) and then air cooling; (b) fine pearlite in normalized ductile iron that was air cooled after austenitizing
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 87 Fracture surface of ferritic-pearlite ductile iron in Fig. 85 and 86 . The low-temperature fracture occurred via a brittle, quasi-cleavage mode. SEM, 715× (R.C. Voigt and L.M. Eldoky, University of Kansas)
More
1