1-20 of 782

Search Results for ferrite-pearlite

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 1A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 August 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v01a.a0006300
EISBN: 978-1-62708-179-5
... Abstract This article discusses the stable and metastable three-phase fields in the binary Fe-C phase diagram. It schematically illustrates that austenite decomposition requires accounting for nucleation and growth of ferrite and then nucleation and growth of pearlite in the remaining...
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 72 Fatigue crack (arrows) in a ferrite-pearlite microstructure in a carbon steel. Etched with 2% nital. 800× More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 9 Summary of fatigue-crack-growth data for ferrite-pearlite steels. Source: Ref 9 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 43 Light micrograph of a ferrite-pearlite microstructure from a carbon steel reinforcing rod revealed using replicating tape. Specimen etched with picral More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 40 Summary of fatigue crack growth data for ferrite-pearlite steels. Source: Ref 17 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 5 Microstructures of (a) a gray cast iron with a ferrite-pearlite matrix, 4% picral etch, 320×, and (b) an alloy white cast iron. White constituent is cementite, and the darker constituent is martensite with some retained austenite. 4% picral etch. 250×. Courtesy of A.O. Benscoter, Lehigh More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 6 Ferrite-pearlite microstructure of an as-sintered PM carbon steel (F-0005) More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 8 Ferrite-pearlite microstructure of an as-sintered PM copper steel (FC-0208) More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 1 Fully annealed 1040 steel showing a ferrite-pearlite microstructure. Etched in 4% picral plus 2% nital. Original magnification: 500× More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 20 Microstructure of typical ferrite-pearlite structural steels at two different carbon contents. (a) 0.10% C. (b) 0.25% C. 2% nital + 4% picral etch. Original magnification: 200×. Source: Ref 26 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 32 Ferrite/pearlite microstructure of an as-sintered P/M carbon steel (F-0005) More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 37 Ferrite/pearlite microstructure of an as-sintered P/M copper steel (FC-0208) More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 28 Microstructure of an ASTM A36 structural steel showing ferrite + pearlite. Note the remnants of scratches in the softer ferrite phase. These subsurface deformation zones from grinding (as shown in Fig. 26 ) were not removed in the polish. 2% nital etch. 100× More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 1 Ferrite-pearlite microstructure of a typical HSLA structural steel (ASTM A 572, grade 50). 2% nital + 4% picral etch. 200× More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 3 Microstructure of a gray cast iron with a ferrite-pearlite matrix. Note the graphite flakes dispersed throughout the matrix. 4% picral etch. 320×. Courtesy of A.O. Benscoter, Lehigh University More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 18 Microstructure of typical ferrite-pearlite structural steels at two different carbon contents. (a) 0.10% C. (b) 0.25% C. 2% nital + 4% picral etch. 200× More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 19 Mechanical properties of ferrite-pearlite steels as a function of carbon content. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 20 Effect of carbon content in ferrite-pearlite steels on Charpy V-notch transition temperature and shelf energy. Source: Ref 17 More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 62 Micrograph showing banded ferrite-pearlite structure and corrosion damage at outer edge of the failed tube. Original magnification: 200× More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 15 Summary of fatigue crack-growth data for ferrite-pearlite steels. Source: Ref 19 More