Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
failure assessment diagram
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 462 Search Results for
failure assessment diagram
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003513
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
... diagram (FAD), and deformation plasticity failure assessment diagram (DPFAD). This article presents the origin and description of FAD and addresses R6 FAD using J-integral. It details the fracture criteria of BS 7910. The factors to be considered during the use of FAD and the applications of FAD are also...
Abstract
Optimized modeling of fracture-critical structural components and connections requires the application of elastic-plastic fracture mechanics. Such applications, however, can require sophisticated analytical techniques such as crack tip opening displacement (CTOD), failure assessment diagram (FAD), and deformation plasticity failure assessment diagram (DPFAD). This article presents the origin and description of FAD and addresses R6 FAD using J-integral. It details the fracture criteria of BS 7910. The factors to be considered during the use of FAD and the applications of FAD are also reviewed.
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 2 Example of a typical failure assessment diagram. FAP, failure assessment point; FAC, failure assessment curve; σ f , flow strength, average of yield and tensile strengths; σ y , yield strength; solid line, without residual stress; dashed line, with residual stress
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 4 Failure assessment diagram concept for assessing cracked components for brittle fracture and plastic collapse
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Failure assessment diagram (R6 curve) as proposed by the United Kingdom Central Electricity Generating Board. SF, safety factor; σ, applied stress; σ y , yield strength; a, crack length; W, panel width
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 8 Failure assessment diagram with K r < 1, depending on the value of L r . FAP, failure assessment point; FAC, failure assessment curve
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 11 Failure assessment diagram (R6, Appendix 8) for WF14 × 730 H-section, a/c = 0.5, with residual stresses. Collapse ratio is a function of flow stress σ f ; FAP, failure assessment point
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Image
in Corrosion and Remaining Life Assessment
> Analysis and Prevention of Component and Equipment Failures
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 8 Equalization tank failure assessment diagram for a = 2.54 mm (0.1 in.) and ϕ = 90°. K r , toughness ratio; L r , load ratio
More
Image
in Brittle Fracture Assessment and Failure Assessment Diagrams
> Analysis and Prevention of Component and Equipment Failures
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 5 Failure assessment diagram (FAD) results. (a) Without weld residual stress. (b) With weld residual stress
More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 25 Depiction of the failure assessment diagram and the trajectory of assessment points as a flaw propagates
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 27 Failure assessment diagram concept for assessing cracked components for brittle fracture and plastic collapse
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 10 Failure assessment diagram based on the stress intensity ratio ( K r = K / K c ) and stress ratio ( S r = σ/σ fc ) where σ fc is the plastic collapse stress. General regions are shown for linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) and elastic plastic fracture mechanics (EPFM).
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 2 Failure assessment diagram showing operative region of HEDE and HELP hydrogen degradation
More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 August 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11A.a0006809
EISBN: 978-1-62708-329-4
... to brittle fracture. Additionally, a series of case study examples are presented that demonstrate assessment procedures used to mitigate the risk of brittle fracture in process equipment. brittle fracture carbon steel failure assessment diagrams low-alloy steel piping pressure vessels risk...
Abstract
A detailed fracture mechanics evaluation is the most accurate and reliable prediction of process equipment susceptibility to brittle fracture. This article provides an overview and discussion on brittle fracture. The discussion covers the reasons to evaluate brittle fracture, provides a brief summary of historical failures that were found to be a result of brittle fracture, and describes key components that drive susceptibility to a brittle fracture failure, namely stress, material toughness, and cracklike defect. It also presents industry codes and standards that assess susceptibility to brittle fracture. Additionally, a series of case study examples are presented that demonstrate assessment procedures used to mitigate the risk of brittle fracture in process equipment.
Image
in Failure Analysis and Life Assessment of Structural Components and Equipment
> Failure Analysis and Prevention
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 16 Failure assessment diagrams used to evaluate the elastic-plastic behavior of structures to estimate safe operation. (a) The CEGB R6 curve. If a point describing the state of a component or structure falls below the R6 curve then the structure is considered safe. A point falling
More
1