1-20 of 619 Search Results for

erosion test

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 23 Solid-particle impingement erosion test (ASTM G76) results to compare cobalt-base alloys with selected alloys using a 250 to 300 μm (0.010 to 0.012 in.) diameter silicon carbide erodent at impact angles of 30, 60, and 90°. Tests conducted at room temperature with 60 m/s (200 ft/s More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 24 Solid-particle impingement erosion test (ASTM G76) results to compare cobalt-base alloys with selected alloys using a 75 to 200 μm (0.003 to 0.008 in.) diameter quartz erodent of impact angles of 30, 60, and 90°. Tests conducted at room temperature with 60 m/s (200 ft/s) particle More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 25 Solid-particle impingement erosion test (ASTM G76) results to compare cobalt-base alloys with selected alloys using a 50 μm (in.) alumina erodent of impact angles of 30 and 90°. Tests conducted at room temperature with 84 m/s (276 ft/s) particle velocity. Experimental high-molybdenum More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 26 Room-temperature solid-particle impingement erosion test (ASTM G76) results to compare cobalt-base alloys with selected alloys using a 400 μm (0.016 in.) mean diameter silicon carbide erodent at an impact angle of 60°. Test parameters: test temperature, 20 °C (70 °F); particle velocity More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 27 High-temperature solid-particle impingement erosion test (ASTM G76) results to compare cobalt-base alloys with selected alloys using an 80 μm (0.003 in.) mean diameter alumina erodent at an impact angle of 30°. Test parameters: test temperature, 850 °C (1560 °F); particle velocity, 20 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 28 Vibratory cavitation erosion test (ASTM G32) results to relate cobalt-base wrought alloys with comparable alloys. Test parameters: test temperature, 16 °C (61 °F); test medium, distilled water; frequency, 20 kHz; amplitude, 0.05 mm (0.002 in.). All samples were solution annealed More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 4 Schematic diagrams showing four classes of erosion test methods. (a) Gas-blast rig. (b) Centrifugal accelerator. (c) Wind tunnel. (d) Whirling arm tester More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 5
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v05.a0001302
EISBN: 978-1-62708-170-2
... Abstract Standardization, repeatability, convenience, short testing time, and simple measuring and ranking techniques are desirable in wear and erosion tests. This article provides a brief review of the wear testing methods and wear and erosion test equipment. General elements of a wear test...
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 24 Coriolis erosion tester with (a, b) sliding and (c) impact erosion testing setup. Courtesy of GIW Industries, Inc. More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003284
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... Abstract This article addresses the important variables in erosion, such as particle impact velocity; particle impact angle; particle size, shape, and material; and ambient temperature. It describes four erosion test methods: the gas-blast method, a method using a centrifugal accelerator test...
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 7 Schematic of specimen fixturing for particle erosion testing. Source: Ref 12 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 8 Results of particle erosion tests. Source: Ref 12 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 22 Schematic of a typical vibratory erosion/cavitation test apparatus. Source: Ref 54 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 23 Examples of rotating disk and rotating arm erosion: cavitation test apparatuses. (a) Small, relatively low-speed rotating disk and jet apparatus. (b) Large, high-speed rotating arm spray apparatus. Source: Ref 55 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 29 Slurry erosion pot test data to relate cobalt-base wrought alloys with comparable alloys. Test parameters: test temperature, 20 °C (70 °F); test medium, 80 μm (0.003 in.) mean diameter alumina in tap water; particle loading, 0.12 kg/L; particle velocity, 5 m/s (16 ft/s); impact angle More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 1 Schematic of a typical vibratory erosion/cavitation test apparatus. Source: Ref 4 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 2 Examples of rotating disk and rotating arm erosion/cavitation test apparatuses. (a) Small, relatively low-speed rotating disk and jet apparatus. (b) Large, high-speed rotating arm spray apparatus. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 2 Material loss in hot erosion and erosion-corrosion tests of 19 materials at 550 °C (1020 °F) by quartz sand/KCl mixture. 1–2, steels; 3–4, diffusion coatings; 5–7, arc-sprayed coatings; 8, combustion arc coating; 9–12, high-velocity oxyfuel (HVOF) coatings; 13, spray and fuse coating More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
27 . (b) Slurry-pot erosion tester. Source: Ref 27 . (a, b) Reproduced with permission from “Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk Apparatus,” G 99, Corrosion of Metals; Wear and Erosion , Vol 03.02, Annual Book of ASTM Standards , ASTM International, 2019. (c) Slurry-jet More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 January 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0006796
EISBN: 978-1-62708-295-2
.... Hattori and Takinami ( Ref 29 ) carried out scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations of LDI on the wall material (stainless steel SUS 304) for various elapsed time periods after the start of the erosion test (Fig. 15 in Ref 29 ). It was noted that erosion initiates at the grain boundary (Fig.15a...