1-20 of 494

Search Results for environmental chambers

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 23 Environmental chamber for elevated-temperature mechanical testing More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 12 Environmental chamber for fatigue testing More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 2 General arrangement of specimens within a controlled environmental chamber for thermal conductivity measurements using the ASTM C 177 method. This is known as the guarded hot-plate method. More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003314
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... fatigue testing machines and bending fatigue machines. Load cells, grips and alignment devices, extensometry and strain measuring devices, environmental chambers, graphic recorders, furnaces, and heating systems of ancillary equipment are discussed. The article presents technologies available...
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 13 Environmental fatigue test chamber for electrochemical 20 kHz testing More
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 12
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v12.a0000629
EISBN: 978-1-62708-181-8
... in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative humidity. The composites were tested at moisture conditions designed not to alter their conditioning, and at the temperatures noted.) (L. Clements, San Jose State University, and J.C. Liu, Cornell University) Fig. 1297 Fracture surface...
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 5 Typical examples of heating methods for load-frame tension testing. (a) Induction heating. (b) Environmental chamber. (c) Split-furnace setup More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003267
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
..., the test machine must be equipped with a temperature-controlled environmental chamber. One consideration for the suitability of the machine for low-temperature tests is the ease with which a low-temperature environmental chamber can be implemented. The physical characteristics of the test machine come...
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
at 60 °C (140 °F) and 60% relative humidity for at least 2 months and then placed in a drawer in the laboratory for several months before testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
at 60 °C (140 °F) and 60% relative humidity for at least 2 months and then placed in a drawer in the laboratory for several months before testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
, having been placed after drying in a chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 60% relative humidity for at least 2 months and then placed in a drawer in the laboratory for several months before testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
after drying in a chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 60% relative humidity for at least 2 months and then placed in a drawer in the laboratory for several months before testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
months before testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative humidity. The composites were tested at moisture conditions designed not to alter their conditioning, and at the temperatures More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative humidity. The composites were tested at moisture conditions designed not to alter their conditioning, and at the temperatures noted.) (L. Clements, San Jose State University and P.R. Lee, United Technologies) More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative humidity. The composites were tested at moisture conditions designed not to alter their conditioning, and at the temperatures noted.) (L More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative humidity. The composites were tested at moisture conditions designed not to alter their conditioning, and at the temperatures noted.) (L. Clements, San Jose State University, and P.R. Lee, United Technologies) More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
in the laboratory for several months before testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative humidity. The composites were tested at moisture conditions designed not to alter their conditioning More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
in a drawer in the laboratory for several months before testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative humidity. The composites were tested at moisture conditions designed not to alter More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
months and then placed in a drawer in the laboratory for several months before testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative humidity. The composites were tested at moisture conditions More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
% relative humidity for at least 2 months and then placed in a drawer in the laboratory for several months before testing. “Wet” specimens had about 1.5 to 2.0 wt% moisture, having been placed for several months in an environmental chamber at 60 °C (140 °F) and 100% relative humidity. The composites were More