1-20 of 403

Search Results for endurance

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 12 Torsion and bending endurance ratios (fatigue endurance/monotonic strength) with drilled holes and notched values compared with theory More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 9 Fatigue endurance limit versus tensile strength for notched and unnotched cast and wrought steels with various heat treatments. Data obtained in R.R. Moore rotating-beam fatigue tests; theoretical stress concentration factor = 2.2. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 20 Effect of ductility on endurance of ferritic steels. Source: Ref 31 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 19 Effect of surface condition on endurance limit of ductile iron. Tests made on 10.6 mm (0.417 in.) diam specimens. Fully reversed stress ( R = −1) More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 20 Effect of tensile strength and matrix structure on endurance ratio for ductile iron. Source: Ref 11 , 12 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 17 Lubricant tester used to measure endurance (wear) life and load-carrying capacity of either dry solid-film lubricants or wet lubricants in sliding steel-on-steel applications. (a) Key components of instrument. (b) Exploded view showing arrangement of V-blocks and rotating journal More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 16 Fatigue endurance limit versus tensile strength for notched and unnotched cast and wrought steels with various heat treatments. Data obtained in R.R. Moore rotating-beam fatigue tests, theoretical stress-concentration factor = 2.2 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 16 Effect of tensile strength and matrix structure on endurance ratio for ductile iron. Source: Ref 24 , 25 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 17 Goodman diagrams for ductile irons. (a) Endurance limits for bending stresses. (b) Endurance limits for tension-compression stresses. Source: Ref 28 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 9 Tensile strength versus fatigue endurance limit of various powder metallurgy 400-series stainless steels. Source: Ref 29 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 23 Corrosion fatigue endurance data for specimens of 13% Cr steel in rotating-bending testing (mean load zero) at a frequency of 50 Hz and temperature of 23 °C (73 °F). Notched specimens K t ≈ 3. Source: ASM Handbook , Vol 13, p 296 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 18 Effect of grain size on endurance limit and crack growth threshold behavior of low-carbon steel ( Ref 25 ) More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 6 Fatigue endurance limit versus tensile strength for notched and unnotched cast and wrought steels with various heat treatments. Data obtained in R.R. Moore rotating beam fatigue tests of nine steels ( K t = 2.2). Source: Metals Handbook , Volume 1, 8th ed., 1961 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 8 Fatigue endurance ratios of three cast steels versus section size. Bands show the range for specimens taken at different depths from 32 mm, 76 mm, and 152 mm squares. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 9 Effect of various defects on endurance ratio (fatigue strength/monotonic strength) of quenched-and-tempered 8630 cast steel. (a) R.R. Moore rotating beam. (b) Torsion fatigue More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 10 Effect of defect size on fatigue endurance limits of cast steel. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 15 Effect of tensile strength and matrix structure on endurance ratio for ductile iron. Source: Metals Handbook , 9th ed., Vol 1, p 45 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 13 Endurance limits as a function of prior-austenite grain size from various studies of bending fatigue of gas-carburized 4320 steels. Source: Ref 49 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 32 Relation between endurance limit and tensile strength for polished and notched steel specimens. Source: F. Sisco, Alloys of Iron and Carbon , Vol II, Properties , McGraw-Hill, 1937 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 9 Evaluation of the range of finite endurance in Fig. 8 and conjunction with the range of transition in Fig. 5(b) to the type I fatigue diagram More