1-20 of 1895

Search Results for electrical conductivity

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 4E
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2016
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v04e.a0006289
EISBN: 978-1-62708-169-6
... Abstract Heat treatment of aluminum alloys is assessed by various quality-assurance methods that include metallographic examination, hardness measurements, mechanical property tests, corrosion-resistance tests, and electrical conductivity testing. The use of hardness measurements in the quality...
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 22A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2009
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v22a.a0005445
EISBN: 978-1-62708-196-2
... Abstract This article contains a table that lists the electrical conductivity and resistivity of selected metals, alloys, and materials at ambient temperature. These include aluminum and aluminum alloys; copper and copper alloys; electrical heating alloys; instrument and control alloys; relay...
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 13 Electrical properties of copper. (a) Electrical conductivity as a function of amount of cold reduction by drawing. (b) Variation of electrical resistance with applied compressive stress at 30 and 75 °C (86 and 167 °F). Resistance expressed as percent of no load value. More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 1 Effect of impurities in solid solution on electrical conductivity of oxygen-free copper More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 24 Effect of sintered density on electrical conductivity. Source: Ref 14 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 25 Effect of coining and resintering on electrical conductivity. Source: Ref 14 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 23 Effect of alloying elements on the electrical conductivity of copper. Source: Ref 20 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 26 Effect of graphite shape on the thermal and electrical conductivity of gray and ductile irons relative to steel. Source: Ref 50 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 10 Measured cooling curve (at the probe center) and electrical conductivity during quenching of a NiCr cylindical probe with a smooth surface in still boiling water. See text. Final temperature and time, T f and t f . Source: Ref 43 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 2 Typical hardness versus electrical conductivity of 7075 aluminum alloy. Typical only; not for use in acceptance or rejection. IACS, International Annealed Copper Standard. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 3 Changes in electrical conductivity with aging of as-quenched sheet of three major types of precipitation-hardening aluminum alloys. (a) Natural aging. (b) Artificial aging. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 5 Basic configuration of eddy-current electrical conductivity meter More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 7 Effect of cold working on electrical conductivity of copper. (a) High-purity copper reduced by rolling, expressed in Brown & Sharpe (B & S) gage numbers. (b) Electrical conductivity of electrolytic tough pitch copper (C11000) as a function of amount of cold reduction by drawing More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 15 Strength and electrical conductivity relationships in selected wrought beryllium bronzes compared to phosphor bronzes and Cu-Ni-Sn alloys. Each box represents the range of properties spanned by available tempers of the indicated alloy. Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 22 Effect of aging temperature and time on the electrical conductivity of beryllium bronzes (C17510 and C17200). (a) Roll-hardened (TD04 temper) alloy C17510 (Cu-0.2 to 0.6 wt% Be-1.4 to 2.3 wt% Ni). (b) Composite data for alloy C17200 (Cu-1.8 to 2.0 wt% Be-0.20 wt% min Co plus nickel More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 9 Ultimate tensile strength (open symbols) and electrical conductivity (filled symbols) of Cu-7Ag-xR alloys (R =Y, Ce; x = 0.1, 0.3) dependent on the logarithmic deformation strain. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 10 Ultimate tensile strength (open symbols) and electrical conductivity (filled symbols) of Cu-7Ag-M alloys, where M holds for Ni and Mg with a mass fraction of 0.1 and 0.3, respectively, dependent on the logarithmic deformation strain. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 11 Ultimate tensile strength (open symbols) and electrical conductivity (filled symbols) of Cu07Ag-xCr (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5) and Cu-7Ag-1Fe alloys dependent on the logarithmic deformation strain. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 12 Ultimate tensile strength (open symbols) and electrical conductivity (filled symbols) of Cu-7Ag-0.1Zr alloy dependent on the logarithmic deformation strain. More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 13 Ultimate tensile strength as a function of electrical conductivity for Cu-7Ag alloys containing fractions of 0.1% (open symbols) and 0.3% (filled symbols) ternary additions (cerium, chromium, nickel, magnesium, yttrium, and zirconium). Data are shown for η ranging from 3 to 5 More