Fig. 47 Effective strain contours predicted using (a) Yld2000-2d and (b) Yld2004-18p. The maximum effective strain for each was 0.42 More

Fig. 1 Correlation of effective strain amplitude versus N f for axial and torsional fatigue of Haynes 188 cobalt-base alloy at 760 °C. Note that the torsional data are shifted to the right. Source: Ref 19 . More

Fig. 27 The solid line is the effective strain versus number of cycles to failure for the matrix material. The symbols are the calculated effective strains in the matrix at the notch tip versus number of cycles to observed crack initiation. Source: Ref 49 . Additional data can be seen in Ref More

Fig. 13 Contour map of predicted effective strain for an isothermally forged turbine disk More

Fig. 9 Dependence of shear stress and mean axial stress on effective strain in fixed-end torsion tests at high temperatures. Source: Ref 12 More

Fig. 33 Effect of the gage length-to-radius ratio on the effective strain to failure ( ε ¯ f ) in torsion tests. Lines join results at similar strain rate and temperature. Source: Ref 35 More

Fig. 21 Dependence of shear stress and mean axial stress on effective strain in fixed end torsion tests at high temperature. Source: Ref 16 More

Fig. 23 Effective strain in titanium sample as a function of final radius of element r f in partially collapsed geometry for two configurations with final inner sample radii R f equal to 3.1 and 4.3 mm (0.12 and 0.17 in.) More

Fig. 19 Contour map of predicted effective strain for an isothermally forged turbine disk More

Fig. 2 Calculated distribution of effective strain in polycrystals of different grain sizes under uniaxial tension. (a) Grain size = 4 nm. (b) Grain size = 25 μm. A smaller grain size shows more strain near the grain boundaries, including lobes of shear strain, but the coarser grain size More

Fig. 26 Strain-controlled matrix fatigue data plotted in terms of the effective strain criterion. Source: Ref 49 More

Fig. 51 Comparison of effective stress-strain curves determined for type 304L stainless steel in compression, tension, and torsion. (a) Cold-working and warm-working temperatures. (b) Hot-working temperatures. Source: Ref 66 More

Fig. 2 Comparison of effective stress-strain curves determined for type 304L stainless steel in compression, tension, and torsion. (a) Cold working and warm working temperatures. (b) Hot working temperatures. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 8 Effective (von Mises) stress-strain behavior for a 150 μm (6 mils) thick silver interlayer ( t / d = 0.024), cated using planar-magnetron (PM) sputter deposition, tested in torsion, along with results reported for bulk polycrystalline (annealed) silver More

Fig. 29 Comparison of effective stress-strain curves determined for type 304L stainless steel in compression, tension, and torsion. (a) Cold and warm working temperatures. (b) Hot working temperatures. Source: Ref 100 More

Fig. 44 Relation between effective fracture strain from tension and from torsion tests for several alloys. Source: Ref 114 More

Fig. 10 Flexural condition based upon maximum, effective ultimate strain in the composite ε FRP =ε max . The terms are defined in the text. More

Fig. 8 Effective (von Mises) stress-strain behavior for a 150 μm (6 mil) thick silver interlayer ( t / d = 0.024), fabricated using PM sputter deposition, tested in torsion, along with results reported for bulk polycrystalline (annealed) silver More

Fig. 6 Schematic of the effective stress-strain response for damaging brittle fibers, based on the statistical model of Ref 16 , 17 More

Fig. 8 Typical compression effective stress-strain response of an architected material, showing the key metrics of interest that can be estimated from it More