1-20 of 157 Search Results for

dark-field illumination

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 51 Same as in Fig. 50 but examined in dark-field illumination. M, martensite; EC, eutectic carbides; and SC, secondary carbides. Original magnification: 1000× More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 54 Same as in Fig. 53 but examined in dark-field illumination. EC, eutectic carbides; SC, secondary carbides. Original magnification: 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 15 Unprepared cross sections of structural foams. (a) Dark-field illumination, 10× objective. (b) Bright-field illumination, 65 mm (2.559 in.) macrophotograph More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 47 Same as in Fig. 46 but examined in dark-field illumination. EC, eutectic carbides; SC, secondary carbides; and M, martensite. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 50 Same as in Fig. 49 but examined in dark-field illumination. EC, eutectic carbides; SC, secondary carbides. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 18 Principles of dark-field illumination. Basic components of an opaque-stop microscope More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 9
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0003754
EISBN: 978-1-62708-177-1
... discusses the examination of specimen surfaces using polarized light, phase contrast, oblique illumination, dark-field illumination, bright-field illumination, interference-contrast illumination, and phase contrast illumination. Special techniques and devices that may be used with the optical microscope...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 10
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 December 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v10.a0006684
EISBN: 978-1-62708-213-6
...-field illumination, dark-field illumination, polarized light illumination, or differential interference contract, generally by the Nomarski technique. This article concentrates on how to reveal microstructure properly to enable the proper identification of the phases and constituents and, if needed...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 9
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0009075
EISBN: 978-1-62708-177-1
...-field illumination, dark-field illumination, polarized-light microscopy, interference and contrast microscopy, and fluorescence microscopy. The article also provides a discussion of sample preparation materials such as dyes, etchants, and stains for the analysis of composite materials using optical...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 21
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v21.a0003464
EISBN: 978-1-62708-195-5
... grinding, and polishing. The preparation techniques of ultrathin sections are also summarized. The article explains the illumination methods used by reflected light microscopy to view a specimen. These consist of epi-bright-field illumination, epi-dark-field illumination, epi-polarized light, and epi...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 9
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0009079
EISBN: 978-1-62708-177-1
... Abstract This article describes the microcrack analysis of composite materials using bright-field illumination, polarized light, dyes, dark-field illumination, and epi-fluorescence. bright-field illumination composite materials dark-field illumination dyes epi-fluorescence microcrack...
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 17 Comparison of bright-field (a), DIC (b), and dark-field (c), illumination for viewing a partially fractured (by impact) specimen of AISI type 312 weld metal containing substantial σ phase. All 240× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
to the composite surface and wiped off with an acetone-dampened cloth. The dye wicked through the composite from the surface, leaving the dye in the microcracks. Dark-field illumination, 5× objective. (b) Top surface of the aramid fiber composite facesheet after failure. DYKEM Steel Red dye was applied More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 21 Cu-11.8Al (aluminum bronze), heat treated, with martensite in the microstructure. (a) Bright-field illumination. (b) Dark-field illumination. (c) Differential interference-contrast illumination. (d) Crossed polarized light illumination. As-polished. 200× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 36 Solution-annealed and aged Waspaloy (UNS N07001). (a) Bright-field illumination. (b) Dark-field illumination. (c) Differential interference-contrast illumination. Glyceregia. 200× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 25 Lighting effects to enhance contrast between phase constituents in an unetched specimen of Al-Si-Cu-Ni alloy. (a) Bright-field illumination with silicon (A, dark gray), α-Al(FeMn)Si (B, light gray), and Al 2 Cu (C, beige). (b) Dark-field illumination with phase boundaries revealed. (c More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 56 Microstructure of a defect in an enamel coating on a low-carbon sheet. (a) Bright-field illumination. (b) Dark-field illumination. 2% nital etch. 100× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 19 Austenitic stainless steel (Fe-20Cr-33Ni-2.5Mo-3.5Cu and Nb + Ta), solution annealed. (a) Bright-field illumination. (b) Dark-field illumination. (c) Differential interference-contrast illumination. 15 mL HCl, 10 mL acetic acid, 10 mL HNO 3 , and 2 drops glycerol. 400× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 20 Cu-8.9P sand cast alloy showing the α + Cu 3 P eutectic. (a) Bright-field illumination. (b) Dark-field illumination. (c) Differential interference-contrast illumination. Swab etched using an aqueous solution of 3% (NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 and 1% NH 4 OH. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 3 Comparison of light microscope (a and b) and SEM (c and d) fractographs of cleavage of faces in a coarse-grain Fe-2.5Si alloy broken at −195 °C (−320 °F). (a) Bright-field illumination. (b) Dark-field illumination. (c) Secondary electron image. (d) Everhart-Thornley backscattered More