Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
current density
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 1781
Search Results for current density
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
in High-Temperature Superconductors for Wires and Tapes[1]
> Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 1 Plot of critical current density versus magnetic flux density to compare properties of powder-in-tube process oxide-base superconductors with that of conventional superconductors. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SSC, superconducting supercollider
More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 25 Classical distributions of current density J and power density p v as a function of distance from the workpiece surface due to the skin effect according to Eq 51 and 51a
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 11 Relative current density in soil as a function of distance from the current source, with the maximum current density of interest 1 ft (0.3 m) from the source.
More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 10 Skin effect. (a) Current density versus distance from surface. (b) Current density and power density distributions as percentage versus penetration depth due to skin effect. Source: Ref 1
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 5 Oxidation current density vs. time following rupture of the protective oxide on a stainless steel wire by rapid straining in hot water. A high-peak (bare-surface) current density (generally ≥ 1 A/cm 2 , corresponding to rapid metal dissolution) is followed by repassivation
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 6 The relationship between (a) the bare-surface current density and (b) the maximum environmentally assisted crack growth rate for various material/environment systems. This demonstrates the Faradaic agreement in the film rupture/slip oxidation between dissolution kinetics
More
Image
in Modeling of Thermal-Electrical-Mechanical Coupling in Fusion Welding
> Welding Fundamentals and Processes
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 13 Isocontours depicting computed current density distribution (A/mm 2 ) in the sheet-electrode geometry at (a) 5, (b) 20, (c) 40, and (d) 60 ms. Other welding parameters: welding current = 7.0 kA and electrode force = 2.2 kN
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 2 Relationship between current density and single-electrode potential for electrolytes possessing polishing action over a wide range of voltages and currents
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 3 Cell voltage as a function of anode current density for electropolishing copper in ortho-H 3 PO 4 (900 g per 1000 mL H 2 O), using a potentiometric circuit
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 26 Idealized current density versus applied voltage for many common electrolytes. Regions for electrolytic etching and polishing are indicated.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 25 Oxidation current density versus time relationship for a strained crack tip. Source: Ref 59
More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 13 Current density ratio versus nondimensional radius. Time, 2 cycles; R c , radius of contact. Source: Ref 33
More
Image
in Principles of Superconductivity
> Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 8 Scaling law behavior of the critical current density ( J c ) for (a) several niobium-titanium alloys ( Ref 25 ) and (b) a Nb 3 Sn conductor ( Ref 26 ). In both cases, F p = J c B is plotted, scaled by the maximum value versus the reduced applied magnetic field, h = H a / H
More
Image
in Principles of Superconductivity
> Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 12 Transport current density ( J ) flowing through the superconductor. The flux lines experience a reactive force given by the Lorentz force equation, F L = J × B . In the absence of flux pinning, the Lorentz force will cause the flux lines to flow in a direction perpendicular
More
Image
in Niobium-Titanium Superconductors
> Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 28 Plot of critical current density versus strain (since the last precipitation heat treatment) for a multifilamentary composite that received 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 heat treatments. Courtesy of Supercon, Inc.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 20 Unreacted NbSn high-current density composite superconductor wire produced for high-field magnet application using tin-core MJR process. (a) 100× bright field illumination (B.F.). (b) 1000× differential interference contrast (D.I.C.). The 60 subelements in the 0.6 mm (0.024 in.) diam
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 21 Plot of noncopper hysteresis loss versus noncopper current density of the full range of current and filament size for tin-core (Nb-1%Ti) 3 Sn superconductor. Modified jelly roll method was used. T c was 4.2 K, μ o H c2 of 10 T, and resistivity, ρ, of 10 −13 Ω · m. US-DPC, United
More
Image
in Ternary Molybdenum Chalcogenides (Chevrel Phases)
> Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials
Published: 01 January 1990
Image
in High-Temperature Superconductors for Wires and Tapes[1]
> Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 3 Plot of critical current density versus external magnetic field at 4.2 K to compare two silver-sheathed powder-in-tube superconducting oxide wires (Bi-2212/Ag and YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 ) with three conventional multifilamentary wires. J c data is for superconductor cross section, also
More
Image
in High-Temperature Superconductors for Wires and Tapes[1]
> Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 5 Plot of critical current density versus external magnetic field at measurement temperature of 77 K to compare sintered powder YBCO tape-shaped wire with melt-processed YBCO tape-shaped wire. Source: Ref 21
More
1