1-20 of 1781

Search Results for current density

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 1 Plot of critical current density versus magnetic flux density to compare properties of powder-in-tube process oxide-base superconductors with that of conventional superconductors. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SSC, superconducting supercollider More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 25 Classical distributions of current density J and power density p v as a function of distance from the workpiece surface due to the skin effect according to Eq 51 and 51a More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 11 Relative current density in soil as a function of distance from the current source, with the maximum current density of interest 1 ft (0.3 m) from the source. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 10 Skin effect. (a) Current density versus distance from surface. (b) Current density and power density distributions as percentage versus penetration depth due to skin effect. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 5 Oxidation current density vs. time following rupture of the protective oxide on a stainless steel wire by rapid straining in hot water. A high-peak (bare-surface) current density (generally ≥ 1 A/cm 2 , corresponding to rapid metal dissolution) is followed by repassivation More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 6 The relationship between (a) the bare-surface current density and (b) the maximum environmentally assisted crack growth rate for various material/environment systems. This demonstrates the Faradaic agreement in the film rupture/slip oxidation between dissolution kinetics More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 13 Isocontours depicting computed current density distribution (A/mm 2 ) in the sheet-electrode geometry at (a) 5, (b) 20, (c) 40, and (d) 60 ms. Other welding parameters: welding current = 7.0 kA and electrode force = 2.2 kN More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 2 Relationship between current density and single-electrode potential for electrolytes possessing polishing action over a wide range of voltages and currents More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 3 Cell voltage as a function of anode current density for electropolishing copper in ortho-H 3 PO 4 (900 g per 1000 mL H 2 O), using a potentiometric circuit More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 26 Idealized current density versus applied voltage for many common electrolytes. Regions for electrolytic etching and polishing are indicated. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 25 Oxidation current density versus time relationship for a strained crack tip. Source: Ref 59 More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 13 Current density ratio versus nondimensional radius. Time, 2 cycles; R c , radius of contact. Source: Ref 33 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 8 Scaling law behavior of the critical current density ( J c ) for (a) several niobium-titanium alloys ( Ref 25 ) and (b) a Nb 3 Sn conductor ( Ref 26 ). In both cases, F p = J c B is plotted, scaled by the maximum value versus the reduced applied magnetic field, h = H a / H More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 12 Transport current density ( J ) flowing through the superconductor. The flux lines experience a reactive force given by the Lorentz force equation, F L = J × B . In the absence of flux pinning, the Lorentz force will cause the flux lines to flow in a direction perpendicular More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 28 Plot of critical current density versus strain (since the last precipitation heat treatment) for a multifilamentary composite that received 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 heat treatments. Courtesy of Supercon, Inc. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 20 Unreacted NbSn high-current density composite superconductor wire produced for high-field magnet application using tin-core MJR process. (a) 100× bright field illumination (B.F.). (b) 1000× differential interference contrast (D.I.C.). The 60 subelements in the 0.6 mm (0.024 in.) diam More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 21 Plot of noncopper hysteresis loss versus noncopper current density of the full range of current and filament size for tin-core (Nb-1%Ti) 3 Sn superconductor. Modified jelly roll method was used. T c was 4.2 K, μ o H c2 of 10 T, and resistivity, ρ, of 10 −13 Ω · m. US-DPC, United More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 4 Recent critical current density results in PMS wires More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 3 Plot of critical current density versus external magnetic field at 4.2 K to compare two silver-sheathed powder-in-tube superconducting oxide wires (Bi-2212/Ag and YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 ) with three conventional multifilamentary wires. J c data is for superconductor cross section, also More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 5 Plot of critical current density versus external magnetic field at measurement temperature of 77 K to compare sintered powder YBCO tape-shaped wire with melt-processed YBCO tape-shaped wire. Source: Ref 21 More