Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
contact angle
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 1209
Search Results for contact angle
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Fig. 3 Schematic showing relationship of contact angle to surface tension. (a) Wetting system. (b) Nonwetting system
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 16 Wilhelmy plate method showing the effect of contact angle hysteresis for emersion and immersion. Adapted from Ref 41
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2014
Fig. 8 Images showing the contact angle of (a) water, (b) 0.001 vol% nanofluid (NF), (c) 0.005 vol% NF, (d) 0.01 vol% NF, (e) 0.05 vol% NF, (f) 0.01 vol% NF, and (g) 0.05 vol% NF. Source: Ref 131
More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 1 Schematic showing relationship of contact angle to surface tension. (a) Wetting system. (b) Nonwetting system. Source: Ref 1
More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 10 Contact angle of synthetic Fe-3.66C-1.3Si alloy on silica sand (AFS GFN 71) in argon atmosphere as a function of temperature. Source: Ref 21
More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 11 Calculated influence of oxygen on the contact angle in the Fe-O/SiO 2 system. Source: Ref 22
More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 2 Measurement of contact angle, θ, and relationship between the liquid-vapor (LV), solid-vapor (SV), and solid-liquid (SL) surface energies
More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 22 Theoretical evaluation of the influence of contact angle on penetration length calculated with Eq 16 . Values used for calculation include f d = 0.65, h = 200 mm, γ LV = 1.9 J · m –2 . Source: Ref 36
More
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 14 (a) Method to calculate hatch spacing, where α is the contact angle of the deposit. (b) Results of single-track experiments using laser-based directed-energy deposition of Ti-6Al-4V alloy for measured deposition heights and widths and calculated hatch spacing based on the measured
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Image
Published: 12 September 2022
Fig. 8 Variation in surface roughness and contact angle in simulated body fluid (SBF) as a function of laser fluence for laser-surface-melted AZ31B magnesium alloy. Source: Ref 46
More
Image
Published: 01 February 2024
Fig. 3 Effect of fluid wettability on a solid surface. The contact angle serves as a wettability index. Decreasing contact angles indicate increasing wettability.
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 73 Effect of fluid wettability of a fluid on a solid surface. The contact angle serves as a wettability index. Decreasing contact angles indicate increasing wettability.
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Image
in Glossary of Terms: Friction, Lubrication, and Wear Technology
> Friction, Lubrication, and Wear Technology
Published: 31 December 2017
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 8 Tooth contact lines on a spur gear (a), a bevel gear (b), and a low-angle helical gear (c).
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 1 Tooth contact lines on a spur gear (a), a bevel gear (b), and a low-angle helical gear (c). Lines on tooth faces of typical teeth are lines of contact.
More
Book: Composites
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 21
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v21.a0003374
EISBN: 978-1-62708-195-5
..., contact angle, work of adhesion, solid surface energy, and wetting and wicking. The article describes the change in interphase depending on the reinforcing fiber such as glass fiber, polymeric fiber, and carbon fiber. It emphasizes fiber-matrix adhesion measurements by direct methods, indirect methods...
Abstract
Fiber-matrix adhesion is a variable to be optimized in order to get the best properties and performance in composite materials. This article schematically illustrates fiber matrix interphase for composite materials. It discusses thermodynamics of interphase in terms of surface energy, contact angle, work of adhesion, solid surface energy, and wetting and wicking. The article describes the change in interphase depending on the reinforcing fiber such as glass fiber, polymeric fiber, and carbon fiber. It emphasizes fiber-matrix adhesion measurements by direct methods, indirect methods, and composite laminate tests. The effects of interphase and fiber-matrix adhesion on composite mechanical properties, such as composite on-axis properties, composite off-axis properties, and composite fracture properties, are also discussed.
1
