Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
composite structures
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 2591 Search Results for
composite structures
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 7 Flush head applications for composite structures. The fastener head height should not exceed 70% of t , where t is the top sheet thickness. Head diameter, A , is the same for 100° tension and 130° reduced shear fasteners. Head diameter is 0.88 to 0.93 A for 100° shear head
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 19 Blind fasteners for joining composite structures. (a) Threaded-corebolt type. (b) Pull type
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 4 Design methodology for automotive composite structures. RTM, resin transfer molding; SRIM, structural reaction injection molding; CAD, computer-aided design; CAE, computer-aided engineering; TGA, thermogravimetric analysis; DSC, differential scanning calorimetry
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 30 Relative weights of aluminum and carbon/epoxy composite structures. Failure strains are less for loaded holes, for using statistical basis rather than average, and for larger holes. Reliance on benefit from interference-fit fasteners requires absolutely no net or loose-fit bolts
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 36 Gross-section design stresses for bolted composite structures (carbon/epoxy laminates). Chart applicable for bolts up to 9.5 mm (37 in.) in diameter. Larger bolts are associated with progressively lower laminate stresses.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 9
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0009077
EISBN: 978-1-62708-177-1
... Abstract Analyzing the structure of composite materials is essential for understanding how the part will perform in service. Assessing fiber volume variations, void content, ply orientation variability, and foreign object inclusions helps in preventing degradation of composite performance...
Abstract
Analyzing the structure of composite materials is essential for understanding how the part will perform in service. Assessing fiber volume variations, void content, ply orientation variability, and foreign object inclusions helps in preventing degradation of composite performance. This article describes the optical microscopy and bright-field illumination techniques involved in analyzing ply terminations, prepreg plies, splices, and fiber orientation to provide the insight necessary for optimizing composite structure and performance.
Book: Fatigue and Fracture
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 19
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1996
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v19.a0002416
EISBN: 978-1-62708-193-1
... Abstract This article presents the damage tolerance criteria for military composite aircraft structures to safely operate the structures with initial defects or in-service damage. It describes the effects of defects, such as wrinkles in aircraft structures, and the reduction in compressive...
Abstract
This article presents the damage tolerance criteria for military composite aircraft structures to safely operate the structures with initial defects or in-service damage. It describes the effects of defects, such as wrinkles in aircraft structures, and the reduction in compressive strength and tensile strength. The article reviews low velocity impacts in aircraft structures in terms of resin toughness, laminate thickness, specimen size and impactor mass, and post-impact fatigue. It explains the tension strength analysis, such as linear elastic fracture mechanics and R-curve methods, to predict the residual strength of the structures.
Image
Published: 30 September 2014
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 2 Ultrathin section of an area of a honeycomb sandwich composite structure showing the effects of core movement during manufacturing and the resulting deformation and separation of the prepreg plies. (a) Transmitted crossed polarized light, 20× objective. (b and c) Transmitted polarized
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 3 Ultrathin section of areas of the honeycomb sandwich composite structure where resin was found to span the separated prepreg plies after core movement. (a) Transmitted light, phase contrast, 40× objective. (b and c) Transmitted light, phase contrast, 20× objective
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 5 Micrographs of an unprepared honeycomb sandwich composite structure after climbing drum peel testing showing the adhesive surface after failure and the separated honeycomb core. Dark-field illumination, 65 mm macrophotograph
More
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 9 Schematic for placement of composite structural liner for preventive maintenance of large-diameter water pipes. PCCP, prestressed concrete cylinder pipe
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 3 Damage tolerance of a composite structure based on initial design. Flaw size (broken line) and residual strength (solid line) are plotted versus time. The step function nature of the curves represents large growths in the degradation associated with the highest load cycles in each block
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 4 Damage tolerance of a composite structure based on actual usage. Flaw size (broken line) and residual strength (solid line) are plotted versus time. Increased loading could lead to static failure. Increase in the spectrum severity does not affect the compression after impact failure
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
1