1-20 of 1160

Search Results for cold-rolled steel

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 3 Trend of paint delamination of steel products. (a) Cold rolled steel. (b) Hot dip galvanized steel. (c) Galvannealed steel (Fe-Zn alloy). Coating is approximately 25 μm electrophoretic paint with and without phosphate treatment. Artificial damage by Van Laar scratch, scalpel comparable More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 13 Surface of an as-cold-rolled steel sample exhibiting poor corrosion performance. (a) Secondary electron image. (b) Auger image for carbon. (c) Auger image for iron. (d) Auger image for oxygen. Source: Ref 20 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 26 Effect of microalloying on yield strength of hot- and cold-rolled steel strips More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 12 A cracked cementite particle in a cold-rolled low-carbon steel (approximately 0.1% C). A high magnification view of a cracked cementite particle showing multiple cracks and shattering. Courtesy of Richard Holman, University of Tennessee More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 13 A low-carbon sheet steel in the (a) as-cold-rolled unannealed condition, (b) partially recrystallized annealed condition, and (c) fully recrystallized annealed condition. Marshall's etch. Original magnification: 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 12 0.10% carbon steel cold rolled 90% to a thickness of 0.25 mm (0.010 in.) with a Rockwell hardness of 81 (on 30-T scale), then annealed at 550 °C (1025 °F) for 106 s. Recrystallized 10% with Rockwell hardness of 79 (on 30-T scale). Nital etch. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 13 0.10% carbon steel cold rolled the same as in Figure 12 but annealed at 550 °C (1025 °F) for 430 s. Recrystallization increased to 40%, with a reduction in hardness to 76 on Rockwell 30-T scale. Nital etch. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 14 0.10% carbon steel cold rolled the same as in Figure 12 but annealed at 550 °C (1025 °F) for 865 s. Recrystallization increased to 80%, with a reduction in hardness to 70 on Rockwell 30-T scale. Nital etch. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 3 Microstructure of a cold-rolled, low-carbon steel sheet showing ferrite grains at (a) 30%, (b) 50%, (c) 70%, and (d) 90% cold reduction. Marshall's reagent. 500× More
Image
Published: 15 December 2019
Fig. 4 Microstructure of a cold rolled low-carbon sheet steel reduced (a) 10, (b) 30, and (c) 70%. Etched with 2% nital More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 12 Cracked cementite particle in a cold rolled low-carbon steel (approximately 0.1% C). High-magnification view of a cracked cementite particle shows multiple cracks and shattering. Courtesy of R. Holman, University of Tennessee More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 13 Various production stages of 1144 steel. A, hot rolled; B, cold drawn; C, cold drawn and straightened; D, cold drawn, straightened, and strain relieved More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 8 Low-carbon steel, cold rolled 65%, showing the grain structure in the rolling plane ( R ), the longitudinal plane ( L ), and the transverse plane ( T ). RD, rolling direction More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 15 Low-carbon steel, cold rolled 70% and annealed at 450 °C (840 °F) for 260 h and 42 min. Well-developed recrystallized grains and recrystallization nuclei during their formation by subgrain coalescence in the recovered matrix still exhibit a “messy” substructure. Thin-foil TEM specimen More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 16 Type 304L stainless steel, cold rolled 90% at 25 °C (75 °F) and annealed at 600 °C (1110 °F) for 1 h. Early recrystallized grains with annealing twins in a highly “messy” matrix. Thin-foil TEM specimen prepared parallel to the rolling plane. Original magnification 21,600×. Source: Ref More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 7 Cold-rolled 1010 steel breaker cam that was given an intermediate anneal before being coined to final dimensions. Dimensions given in inches More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 1
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v01.a0001011
EISBN: 978-1-62708-161-0
... Abstract This article addresses classifications and designations for carbon and low-alloy steel sheet and strip product forms based on composition, quality descriptors, mechanical properties, and other factors. Carbon steel sheet and strip are available as hot-rolled and as cold-rolled products...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 1
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v01.a0001031
EISBN: 978-1-62708-161-0
... commonly used formable grades. It also lists the typical mechanical properties for common grades of hot-rolled and cold-rolled steel sheets. circle grid analysis mechanical properties metallic coatings microstructure simulative forming tests steel composition steel sheet formability sheet...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 13A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2003
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v13a.a0003675
EISBN: 978-1-62708-182-5
... of the individual elements. The article illustrates the effect of increasing iron, nickel, and copper contamination on the standard ASTM B 117 salt-spray performance of the die-cast AZ91 test specimens as compared to the range of performance observed for cold-rolled steel and die-cast aluminum alloy 380 samples...
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 33 Dynamic stripping force as a function of punch-die clearance. (a) Cold rolled steel. Hardness: 92 HRB. Thickness of metal strip: 3.15 mm (0.124 in.). (b) Hot rolled steel. Hardness: 65 HRB. Thickness of metal strip: 3.25 mm (0.128 in.). (c) Cold rolled steel. Hardness: 93 HRB More