1-20 of 241 Search Results for

cavitation erosion

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003569
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
... Abstract This article considers two mechanisms of cavitation failure: those for ductile materials and those for brittle materials. It examines the different stages of cavitation erosion. The article explains various cavitation failures including cavitation in bearings, centrifugal pumps...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006384
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... Abstract This article provides an overview of cavitation erosion with a specific focus on the estimation of mass loss. It describes the mechanisms of cavitation erosion and the types of laboratory devices to evaluate the resistance to cavitation erosion of materials. The laboratory devices...
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 4 Cavitation erosion: incubation stage of Ti-6Al-4V on vibratory cavitation test. Courtesy of CETIM More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 12 Dependence of maximum erosion rate in cavitation erosion on the combined parameter σ f ′ n ′ More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 24 Investment cast impeller surface roughened by cavitation/erosion in water for injection service. The white ridges are harder delta ferrite, and the dark areas are the softer interdendritic austenite. Original magnification 100× More
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 17 Effect of laser alloying with chromium on the cavitation erosion resistance of gray cast iron in distilled water (a) and 3% sodium chloride solution (b). Source: Ref 24 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 5 Cavitation erosion data on various cobalt-base alloys, Hastelloy alloy C-276, and 316L stainless steel More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 Cavitation erosion of main bearing of diesel engine. Courtesy of CETIM More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 11 Cavitation erosion on tooth surfaces subject to vibrations. Courtesy of CETIM More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 12 Cavitation erosion on side surface of a gear pump subjected to vibrations. Courtesy of CETIM More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 2 Vibratory cavitation erosion of CA-6NM martensitic stainless steel. (a) Deformation rumpling and pitting at lath boundaries. (b) Early stage of material removal More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 3 Vibratory cavitation erosion of type 304 austenitic stainless steel. (a) Linear deformation features and boundary definition. (b) Material removal at upheaved grain boundary More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 Deep cavitation erosion of austenitic stainless steel weld overlay on a carbon steel turbine blade. Courtesy of T.J. Spicher More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Accelerated cavitation erosion and cracking associated with austenitic stainless steel weld deposits on a martensitic stainless steel (CA-15) impeller vane More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 6 Cavitation erosion damage in a gear pump, produced in LEGI mercury cavitation tunnel. The characteristic “orange peel” appearance is observed in the less eroded regions, whereas mass loss and material removal are observed in the most severely eroded regions. More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 9 Example of a cavitation erosion tunnel using a radially diverging axisymmetric test section. (a) Visualization of the attached cavity. Nozzle diameter is 16 mm (0.63 in.). (b) Typical example of an eroded specimen. Erosion is concentrated on a ring that corresponds to the closure region More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 11 Typical cavitation erosion damage during the incubation period. Damage is characterized by nearly isolated pits. The image results from profilometry measurements using a contact profilometer with a measuring step of 1 μm (0.04 mils) in both horizontal directions. The image More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 20 Typical finite-element modeling (FEM) computation of cavitation erosion damage on SS A2205 material. The cavitation aggressiveness was estimated from pitting tests using an inverse FEM computation. Mass loss started after 360 impacts at some locations. The critical plastic strains More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 13 Cavitation erosion resistance of various types of stainless steels. For martensitic alloys tempering temperature and for the ferritic alloys annealing temperature are indicated in the figure. Source: Ref 107 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 28 Vibratory cavitation erosion test (ASTM G32) results to relate cobalt-base wrought alloys with comparable alloys. Test parameters: test temperature, 16 °C (61 °F); test medium, distilled water; frequency, 20 kHz; amplitude, 0.05 mm (0.002 in.). All samples were solution annealed More