Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
cavitation erosion
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 246 Search Results for
cavitation erosion
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006384
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... Abstract This article provides an overview of cavitation erosion with a specific focus on the estimation of mass loss. It describes the mechanisms of cavitation erosion and the types of laboratory devices to evaluate the resistance to cavitation erosion of materials. The laboratory devices...
Abstract
This article provides an overview of cavitation erosion with a specific focus on the estimation of mass loss. It describes the mechanisms of cavitation erosion and the types of laboratory devices to evaluate the resistance to cavitation erosion of materials. The laboratory devices include rotating disks, vibratory devices, cavitating liquid jets, and high-speed cavitation tunnels. The article discusses materials selection and surface protection to prevent cavitation erosion. It reviews the fluid-structure interaction that plays a role in cavitation erosion particularly for compliant materials. The article provides information on the numerical prediction of cavitation erosion damage by the finite element method (FEM).
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003569
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
... Abstract This article considers two mechanisms of cavitation failure: those for ductile materials and those for brittle materials. It examines the different stages of cavitation erosion. The article explains various cavitation failures including cavitation in bearings, centrifugal pumps...
Abstract
This article considers two mechanisms of cavitation failure: those for ductile materials and those for brittle materials. It examines the different stages of cavitation erosion. The article explains various cavitation failures including cavitation in bearings, centrifugal pumps, and gearboxes. It provides information on the cavitation resistance of materials and other prevention parameters. The article describes two American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards for the evaluation of erosion and cavitation, namely, ASTM Standard G 32 and ASTM Standard G 73. It concludes with a discussion on correlations between laboratory results and service.
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 4 Cavitation erosion: incubation stage of Ti-6Al-4V on vibratory cavitation test. Courtesy of CETIM
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 12 Dependence of maximum erosion rate in cavitation erosion on the combined parameter σ f ′ n ′
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 12 Cavitation erosion on side surface of a gear pump subjected to vibrations. Courtesy of CETIM
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 2 Vibratory cavitation erosion of CA-6NM martensitic stainless steel. (a) Deformation rumpling and pitting at lath boundaries. (b) Early stage of material removal
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 3 Vibratory cavitation erosion of type 304 austenitic stainless steel. (a) Linear deformation features and boundary definition. (b) Material removal at upheaved grain boundary
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 Deep cavitation erosion of austenitic stainless steel weld overlay on a carbon steel turbine blade. Courtesy of T.J. Spicher
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Accelerated cavitation erosion and cracking associated with austenitic stainless steel weld deposits on a martensitic stainless steel (CA-15) impeller vane
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 17 Effect of laser alloying with chromium on the cavitation erosion resistance of gray cast iron in distilled water (a) and 3% sodium chloride solution (b). Source: Ref 24
More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 6 Cavitation erosion damage in a gear pump, produced in LEGI mercury cavitation tunnel. The characteristic “orange peel” appearance is observed in the less eroded regions, whereas mass loss and material removal are observed in the most severely eroded regions.
More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 9 Example of a cavitation erosion tunnel using a radially diverging axisymmetric test section. (a) Visualization of the attached cavity. Nozzle diameter is 16 mm (0.63 in.). (b) Typical example of an eroded specimen. Erosion is concentrated on a ring that corresponds to the closure region
More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 11 Typical cavitation erosion damage during the incubation period. Damage is characterized by nearly isolated pits. The image results from profilometry measurements using a contact profilometer with a measuring step of 1 μm (0.04 mils) in both horizontal directions. The image
More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 20 Typical finite-element modeling (FEM) computation of cavitation erosion damage on SS A2205 material. The cavitation aggressiveness was estimated from pitting tests using an inverse FEM computation. Mass loss started after 360 impacts at some locations. The critical plastic strains
More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 13 Cavitation erosion resistance of various types of stainless steels. For martensitic alloys tempering temperature and for the ferritic alloys annealing temperature are indicated in the figure. Source: Ref 107
More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 28 Vibratory cavitation erosion test (ASTM G32) results to relate cobalt-base wrought alloys with comparable alloys. Test parameters: test temperature, 16 °C (61 °F); test medium, distilled water; frequency, 20 kHz; amplitude, 0.05 mm (0.002 in.). All samples were solution annealed
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 2 Cavitation erosion data on various cobalt-base alloys, Hastelloy alloy C-276, and 316L stainless steel
More
Image
in Cobalt and Cobalt Alloys
> Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 5 Cavitation erosion data on various cobalt-base alloys, Hastelloy alloy C-276, and 316L stainless steel
More
1