Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
cantilever beam test
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 219 Search Results for
cantilever beam test
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 1 Cantilever beam testing. (a) Fatigue-cracked cantilever beam test specimen and fixtures. Source: Ref 10 . (b) Determination of stress intensity ( K I ) for precracked cantilever beam specimens where 0.2 ≤ a / W ≤ 0.6. See text for discussion. Courtesy of U.S. Naval Research
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 6 Dimensions and configuration for double-cantilever beam test specimen. Specimen contoured to 3 a 2 / h 3 + 1/ h = C , where C is a constant. All values given in inches (1.0 in. = 25.4 mm)
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 13 Dimensions and configuration for double-cantilever beam test specimen. Specimen contoured to 3 a 2 / h 3 + 1/ h = C , where C is a constant. All values given in inches (1.0 in. = 25.4 mm).
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 12 Double-cantilever beam test (ASTM D 5528). (a) Specimen geometry. (b) Definition of crack- opening displacement. (c) Load-displacement trace during crack growth. a 0 , initial crack growth
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 7 Dimensions and configuration for double-cantilever beam test specimen. Specimen contoured to 3 a 2 / h 3 + 1/ h = C, where C is a constant. All values given in inches
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1998
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.a0003243
EISBN: 978-1-62708-199-3
... information on the cantilever beam test, wedge-opening load test, contoured double-cantilever beam test, three-point and four-point bend tests, rising step-load test, disk-pressure test, slow strain-rate tensile test, and potentiostatic slow strain-rate tensile test for hydrogen embrittlement. constant...
Abstract
Stress-corrosion cracking (SCC) occurs under service conditions, which can result, often without any prior warning, in catastrophic failure. Hydrogen embrittlement is distinguished from stress-corrosion cracking generally by the interactions of the specimens with applied currents. To determine the susceptibility of alloys to SCC and hydrogen embrittlement, several types of testing are available. This article describes the constant extension testing, constant load testing, constant strain-rate testing for smooth specimens and precracked or notched specimens of SCC. It provides information on the cantilever beam test, wedge-opening load test, contoured double-cantilever beam test, three-point and four-point bend tests, rising step-load test, disk-pressure test, slow strain-rate tensile test, and potentiostatic slow strain-rate tensile test for hydrogen embrittlement.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 13A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2003
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v13a.a0003667
EISBN: 978-1-62708-182-5
... Abstract This article begins with a discussion on the classification of hydrogen embrittlement and likely sources of hydrogen and stress. The article describes several hydrogen embrittlement test methods, including cantilever beam tests, wedge-opening load tests, contoured double-cantilever...
Abstract
This article begins with a discussion on the classification of hydrogen embrittlement and likely sources of hydrogen and stress. The article describes several hydrogen embrittlement test methods, including cantilever beam tests, wedge-opening load tests, contoured double-cantilever beam tests, rising step-load tests, and slow strain rate tensile tests. It also describes the interpretation of test results and how to control hydrogen embrittlement during production.
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 10 Examples of fretting fatigue test configurations. (a) Cantilever beam reverse bending with single pads. (b) Rotating fully reversing bending with double foot-pad bridges and proving ring
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 10 Examples of fretting fatigue test configurations. (a) Cantilever beam reverse bending with single pads. (b) Rotating fully reversing bending with double foot-pad bridges and proving ring
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 15 Double-cantilever beam (DCB) test specimen ( Ref 8 ). Slots on both sides of the specimen for restraining the crack to the midplane are not shown.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
1