1-20 of 124

Search Results for benchmarking

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 21 Prefil results on A356 benchmarked to other data (bars) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 15 U-channel forming and benchmark results. (a) Cross-sectional geometry, after springback. (b) Simulation results (points) and superimposed estimated experimental scatter (bars) for results reported by various laboratories. θ 1 and θ 2 , angles characterizing springback in top-hat More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 18 Illustration showing thinning of drawn fender from NUMISHHET 2002 benchmark. (a) Split. (b) No split. Courtesy of Engineering Technology Associates, Inc. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 19 U-channel forming and benchmark results. (a) Cross-sectional geometry, after springback. (b) Simulation results (points) and superimposed estimated experimental scatter (bars) for results reported by various laboratories. θ 1 and θ 2 , angles characterizing springback in top-hat More
Image
Published: 01 February 2024
Fig. 112 Cooling curves of some of the quenchants in the benchmark study compared to new solutions. Quenchant is Aquatensid BWRB. Concentration according to target and, in parentheses, measured by refractometer. (a) Conc.: 10 (9–10)%. (b) Conc.: 13 (13–15)%. (c) Conc.: 5 (5)%. (d) Conc.: 15 More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 22B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 November 2010
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v22b.a0005522
EISBN: 978-1-62708-197-9
... follows the progress of the sophisticated numerical simulations developed following the explosion in available computational resources. Close comparison with precisely controlled benchmark experiments is necessary for guidance and validation. Researchers and engineers are seeking simpler model experiments...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 5B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 September 2015
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v05b.a0006061
EISBN: 978-1-62708-172-6
... Abstract This article provides an insight into the cost estimation of painting projects for both contractors and others. The cost estimating methods include benchmarking, unit price estimating, developed pricing, market pricing, and critical path scheduling. The first step in developing...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 13A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2003
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v13a.a0003642
EISBN: 978-1-62708-182-5
... Abstract Corrosion modeling is an essential benchmarking element for the selection and life prediction associated with the introduction of new materials or processes. These models are most naturally expressed in terms of differential equations or in other nonexplicit forms of mathematics...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 22A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2009
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v22a.a0005438
EISBN: 978-1-62708-196-2
... during software implementation planning to identify suitable programs, software components, and programming languages. It describes the validity tests used in model validation, including boundary-value tests, degenerate problem tests, sensitivity tests, and benchmarking. The article also presents...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002425
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
... include design task probing, customer needs analysis, functional decomposition, and competitive benchmarking for directly mapping customer statements to functional requirements. competitive benchmarking conceptual design configuration design customer needs analysis design for assembly design...
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 19 Illustration showing (a) mean stress distribution and (b) stoning distribution of drawn fender of NUMISHEET 2002 benchmark. Courtesy of Engineering Technology Associates, Inc. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 6 The Pointer broadband optimizer using the smooth topology setting on differentiable functions is compared to the most efficient method. Test problems are sorted by the minimum number of function calls required by any method using the benchmark set. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1997
Fig. 4 Organization of a quality function deployment (QFD) “house of quality” product planning table. 1, voice of customer input; 2, specifications for new product; 3, translation between voice of customer and product specifications; 4, market research information; 5, technical benchmarking; 6 More
Image
Published: 12 September 2022
specimens. Immunostaining of (d) the fibroblast microtubules and (e) the osteoblast actin filaments demonstrated enhanced spreading and proliferation of cells on the binder-jet-printed Ti-6Al-4V substrates when benchmarked with tissue culture polystyrene, commercially available Ti-6Al-4V, and selective More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002424
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
... in firms: customers, employees, benchmarking, and new technology. Competitive manufacturing businesses require constant feedback from the customers who buy, sell, repair, or use the products of the company. If a design engineer is looking for positive new ideas as well as for shortcomings of current...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002429
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
..., technical benchmarking; 6, intersection of specifications (to examine conflicts or synergy); 7, weighting of importance of each characteristics; 8, quantitative goals for new product The other rooms in the house of quality are to help the PDT to make the decisions that deploy the objectives from room...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 19
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1996
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v19.a0002371
EISBN: 978-1-62708-193-1
...) 7075 aluminum alloy. Source: Ref 1 Standard Specimen Fatigue Data as a Benchmark Fatigue properties are normally determined using standard specimens, which often do not reflect the conditions that exist in real components or reflect the type of surface treatment or modifications that might...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 17
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2018
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v17.a0006479
EISBN: 978-1-62708-190-0
... with the objective of achieving and promoting a globally accepted benchmark for organizations operating certification of persons. ISO/IEC 17011, “Conformity Assessment—General Requirements for Accreditation Bodies Accrediting Conformity Assessment Bodies.” This international standard specifies the general...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 24A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 June 2023
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v24A.a0006988
EISBN: 978-1-62708-439-0
... experimental results and typically release the results to participants shortly thereafter. Examples of such modeling challenges include the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Test Series (AM-Bench) ( Ref 22 , 23 ), the Third Sandia Fracture Challenge...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 22B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 November 2010
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v22b.a0005505
EISBN: 978-1-62708-197-9
... be seen as an example of a robust method, as illustrated in Fig. 6 . All of these optimizers were compared against a standard benchmark test created by Dr. Sandgren ( Ref 18 ) to present a wide variety of single-objective optimization problems in many fields of mathematics and engineering. No attempt...