Fig. 15 Comparison of axial fatigue data for untreated and calcium-treated rolled ASTM A516 steel. 51 mm (2 in.) thick plates tested with alternating stress ratio of 0.1. Source: Ref 9 More

Fig. 8 Comparison of smooth axial fatigue rate in cast and wrought Ti-6Al-4V at room temperature with R = +0.1 More

Fig. 5 Comparison of axial fatigue data for untreated and calcium-treated rolled ASTM A516 steel. 51 mm (2 in.) thick plates tested with alternating stress ratio of 0.1. Source: Ref 8 More

Fig. 3 Increase in the notched axial fatigue strength of sintered low-carbon P/M steels after nitrocarburizing for 2 h at 570 °C (1060 °F). (a) F-0000 carbon steel. (b) FC-0205 copper-carbon steel. Metal powder density was 7.1 g/cm 3 (0.256 lb/in. 3 ). Source: Ref 5 More

Fig. 4 Effect of alloy, design, and directionality on the axial fatigue strength of aluminum alloy forgings. Data apply to parts A and B, as shown. Sheet-type fatigue specimens, 3.2 mm (0.125 in.) thick and 6.4 mm (0.250 in.) wide, were cut both parallel and transverse to the forging flow More

Fig. 13 Comparison of axial fatigue strength (at R = −1) and rotating-beam bending fatigue strength ( R = −1) of alloy 3003-0 rolled and drawn rod (19 mm, or 0.75 in., diameter). Unnotched rotating-beam specimens with 250 mm (9⅞ in.) surface radius and 7.5 mm (0.300 in.) minimum diameter More

Fig. 15 Effect of weld bead on axial fatigue ( R = 0) of butt welds in various tempers of 5083 plate with 5356 filler metal. Source: Ref 24 More

Fig. 16 Results of axial fatigue tests of aluminum alloy as-welded butt joints in 9.5 mm (⅜ in.) plate. Source: Ref 26 More

Fig. 7 Axial fatigue curves for unnotched specimens of alloy 2048-T851 plate More

Fig. 8 Modified Goodman diagram for axial fatigue of unnotched specimens of alloy 2048-T851 plate More

Fig. 10 Axial fatigue of alloy 2048-T851 plate More

Fig. 5 Axial fatigue of powder-metallurgy-forged 4620 steel for various levels of forging deformation. Fatigue limit increases as deformation level (height strain) increases. Source: Ref 4 More

Fig. 27 Axial fatigue strength amplitude of transversal specimens from three PM HIP and hot worked HATS at R = 0.1, 10 9 cycles and 50% survival probability More

Fig. 29 Axial fatigue strength at R = −1 of heavily hot worked longitudinal specimens. Circles, conventional cold working steel at 58 HRC; triangles, PM HIP and hot worked cold working steel at 59 HRC More

Fig. 16 Room-temperature axial fatigue curves of two maraging (martensitic) grades of precipitation hardening stainless steels with comparable tensile strength. Solid symbols indicate runout for unnotched ( K t = 1) specimens. Best-fit SN curves are shown for notched specimens ( K t = 3 More

Fig. 2 Axial fatigue strength at 10 7 cycles of bolt-nut assemblies with rolled threads and machined threads ( R = −1). More

Fig. 1 Results of axial fatigue tests of aluminum alloys as-welded butt joints in 3 8 in. plate. Source: Ref 1 More

Fig. 5 Effect of weld bead on axial fatigue ( R = 0) of butt welds in various tempers of 5083 plate with 5356 filler metal. Source: Ref 15 More

Fig. 8 Influence of edge preparation on axial fatigue ( R = 0) of transverse butt welds in 5083-H113 plate, as welded, with 5356 filler metal. Source: Ref 15 More

Fig. 33 Axial fatigue of DRA composite F3A. xx T61. Source: Ref 75 More