1-20 of 604

Search Results for axial fatigue

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 3 Increase in the notched axial fatigue strength of sintered low-carbon P/M steels after nitrocarburizing for 2 h at 570 °C (1060 °F). (a) F-0000 carbon steel. (b) FC-0205 copper-carbon steel. Metal powder density was 7.1 g/cm 3 (0.256 lb/in. 3 ). Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 7 Axial fatigue curves for unnotched specimens of alloy 2048-T851 plate More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 8 Modified Goodman diagram for axial fatigue of unnotched specimens of alloy 2048-T851 plate More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 10 Axial fatigue of alloy 2048-T851 plate More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 8 Comparison of smooth axial fatigue rate in cast and wrought Ti-6Al-4V at room temperature with R = +0.1 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 5 Axial fatigue of powder-metallurgy-forged 4620 steel for various levels of forging deformation. Fatigue limit increases as deformation level (height strain) increases. Source: Ref 4 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 27 Axial fatigue strength amplitude of transversal specimens from three PM HIP and hot worked HATS at R = 0.1, 10 9 cycles and 50% survival probability More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 29 Axial fatigue strength at R = −1 of heavily hot worked longitudinal specimens. Circles, conventional cold working steel at 58 HRC; triangles, PM HIP and hot worked cold working steel at 59 HRC More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 5 Comparison of axial fatigue data for untreated and calcium-treated rolled ASTM A516 steel. 51 mm (2 in.) thick plates tested with alternating stress ratio of 0.1. Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 16 Room-temperature axial fatigue curves of two maraging (martensitic) grades of precipitation hardening stainless steels with comparable tensile strength. Solid symbols indicate runout for unnotched ( K t = 1) specimens. Best-fit SN curves are shown for notched specimens ( K t = 3 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 2 Axial fatigue strength at 10 7 cycles of bolt-nut assemblies with rolled threads and machined threads ( R = −1). More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 1 Results of axial fatigue tests of aluminum alloys as-welded butt joints in 3 8 in. plate. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 5 Effect of weld bead on axial fatigue ( R = 0) of butt welds in various tempers of 5083 plate with 5356 filler metal. Source: Ref 15 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 8 Influence of edge preparation on axial fatigue ( R = 0) of transverse butt welds in 5083-H113 plate, as welded, with 5356 filler metal. Source: Ref 15 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 33 Axial fatigue of DRA composite F3A. xx T61. Source: Ref 75 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Comparison of axial fatigue data for untreated and calcium-treated rolled ASTM A516 steel. 51 mm (2 in.) thick plates tested with alternating stress ratio of 0.1. Source: Ref 9 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 1 Modern servohydraulic axial fatigue testing machine. (a) Basic load train. (b) Hydraulic actuator, servovalve, and displacement sensor (LVDT) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 10 Grip insert designs used for axial fatigue testing. (a) Three-piece collet grip for cylindrical specimens. (b) V-grips for rounds for use in wedge grip body. (c) Wedges for flat specimens. (d) Universal open-front holders. (e) Adapters for special samples (e.g., screws, bolts More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 16 Alignment fixture for minimizing bending strains in axial fatigue testing More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 23 Schematic axial fatigue curve illustrating the effect of tensile mean stress. After Ref 52 More