1-20 of 2502

Search Results for applied stress

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 X-ray diffraction stress versus applied stress for varying average roughness ( R a ). (a) Samples with R a of 1, 3, and 6 μm. (b) Samples with R a of 1, 40, and 56 μm. (Source: Ref 26 ) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 7 Ratio of measured stress and applied stress for varying R a . Source: Ref 26 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 9 X-ray diffraction stress versus applied stress on (a) as-received and (b) electropolished surfaces More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 22 Time to stress-corrosion cracking failure versus applied stress More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 6 X-ray diffraction (XRD) stress versus applied stress for varying average roughness ( R a ). (a) Samples with R a of 1, 3, and 6 μm. (b) Samples with R a of 1, 40, and 56 μm. Source: Ref 35 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 7 Ratio of measured stress (XRD, x-ray diffraction) and applied stress for varying average roughness, R a . Source: Ref 35 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 9 X-ray diffraction stress versus applied stress on (a) as-received and (b) electropolished surfaces More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 22 J c normalized to zero applied stress as a function of stress, σ, at indicated fields for Cu-Nb-Sn, Cu-V-Ga in situ composites, and a conventional commercial V 3 Ga composite. Source: Ref 34 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 14 Crack-tip stress intensity ( K I ) in terms of applied stress (σ) for (a) a center-cracked plate and (b) an edge-cracked plate under uniform tension More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 4 Crack-tip stress-intensity ( K I ) in terms of applied stress (σ) for (a) a center-cracked plate and (b) an edge-cracked plate under uniform tension. The crack shown in (a) is defined as 2 a and the crack shown in (b) is defined as a, because of the convention that any crack More
Image
Published: 01 June 2012
Fig. 22 Time to stress-corrosion cracking failure versus applied stress More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 28 Applied stress versus case depth (net strength). More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 12 Critical crack depth vs. applied stress for WF14 × 730 H-section, a/c = 0.5, δ m = 0.25 mm (0.010 in.) More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 42 Variant coalescence of 18R martensite in Cu-Zn-Ga under applied stress. Source: Ref 42 . Reprinted with permission More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 28 Schematic diagram of time to failure versus applied stress, σ, normalized to the yield strength σ y for stress corrosion More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 60 Relationship of applied stress and flaw depth to crack propagation in hydrogen gas. Dashed lines show an example of the use of such a chart for a steel with K th of 60.5 MPa m (55 ksi in . at an operating stress of 359 MPa (52 ksi). Source: Ref 159 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 7 Hydrogen embrittlement crack growth rate as a function of applied stress intensity for two different hardnesses and environments for an AISI 4340 steel, contoured double-cantilever beam test specimen More
Image
Published: 01 November 1995
Fig. 12 Response of a four-parameter model to a constant applied stress, where σ 0 is the applied stress and t 0 is the removal time of the applied stress. The solid line represents the four-parameter response; the dotted line, the Voigt-Kelvin element response; the dashed line More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 11 Applied stress versus life of tensile-type stainless steel specimens in simulated sea water More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 14 Hydrogen embrittlement crack growth rate as a function of applied stress intensity for two different hardnesses and environments for an AISI 4340 steel contoured double-cantilever beam test specimen More