Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
aluminum alloy 7475
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 94 Search Results for
aluminum alloy 7475
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 1058 Corrosion-fatigue fracture in aluminum alloy 7475-T6 tested in a 3.5% NaCl solution under a cyclic stress-intensity range (Δ K ) of 13 MPa m (12 ksi in. ) at 10 cps, showing contrasting features: ductile striations (unresolved) in smooth regions; brittle striations
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 71 Effect of overaging on part through crack growth of aluminum alloy 7475 subject to 500 h block flight-by-flight fighter spectrum loading in sump tank water. Source: Ref 127
More
Image
Published: 15 June 2019
Fig. 22 Crack resistance curves for aluminum alloy 7475 sheet. T-L, transverse-longitudinal; L-T, longitudinal-transverse. Source: Ref 43
More
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 2B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v02b.a0006747
EISBN: 978-1-62708-210-5
... Abstract Alloy 7475 is a controlled-toughness alloy for sheet and plate product forms. This datasheet provides information on key alloy metallurgy, processing effects on physical and mechanical properties, and fabrication characteristics of this 7xxx series alloy. aluminum alloy 7475...
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 27 Examples of cavitation. (a) In aluminum (Al-7475) alloy. Courtesy of A.K. Ghosh. (b) In titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy. Source: Ref 37
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 14 (a) Stress versus strain and (b) corresponding strain-rate sensitivity m for superplastic aluminum alloy 7475 in three different grain sizes. Tests were performed at 516 °C (960 °F), the optimal forming temperature for alloy 7475. Source: Ref 21
More
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 2B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v02b.a0006743
EISBN: 978-1-62708-210-5
... provides a fatigue life comparison of these alloys. aluminum alloy 7175 aluminum alloy 7475 ductility fatigue life physical properties Alloys 7175 and 7475 ( Table 1 ) are high-purity versions of 7075 to improve ductility in the transverse direction of thick products. The Zn/Mg ratio in 7175...
Abstract
Alloys 7175 and 7475 are high-purity versions of 7075 to improve ductility in the transverse direction of thick products. This datasheet provides information on key alloy metallurgy and processing effects on physical and mechanical properties of these 7xxx series alloys. It also provides a fatigue life comparison of these alloys.
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 13 Steps involved in thermal and mechanical processing to produce superplastic aluminum alloy 7475. Source: Ref 30
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 7 Aluminum alloys 2124 and 7475 are tougher versions of alloys 2024 and 7075. High-purity metal (low iron and silicon) and special processing techniques are needed to optimize toughness in these materials. Source: Ref 14
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 12 Fracture toughness comparisons of aluminum alloys 2024, 2124, 7075 and 7475. Source: Ref 15
More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 2B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v02b.a0006457
EISBN: 978-1-62708-210-5
... copper, chromium, silicon, and iron from commercial alloys. Consequently, an often-used approach to improve the toughness of high-strength aluminum alloys has been the reduction of iron and silicon levels. The development of improved alloys such as 7475, 7050, and 2124 has hinged, in large part, upon...
Abstract
This article discusses the concepts underlying linear elastic fracture mechanics and elastic-plastic fracture mechanics as well as their importance in characterizing the fracture behavior of the high-strength aluminum alloys. It describes the three methods used for analyzing elastic-plastic fracture, namely R-curve concept, J-integral concept, and crack tip opening displacement method. The article considers the primary measures used to assess the toughness of aluminum alloy castings and wrought alloys: notch toughness, tear resistance, and plane-strain fracture toughness.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14a.a0009013
EISBN: 978-1-62708-185-6
.... Examples of hermomechanical Testing: Design, Experiment, and Analysis Four examples illustrate how the various considerations in testing are successfully used to solve practical thermomechanical processing problems. Example 1: Superplastic Forming of Aluminum Alloy 7475 This first example...
Abstract
Thermomechanical are used to gain insight into the causes of problems that arise during a given thermomechanical process. This article provides examples to demonstrate how significant the parameters were selected for specific tests. It examines the types of problems that can occur during a thermomechanical process. The article provides information on the thermophysical properties, which include specific heat, coefficient of thermal expansion, thermal conductivity/diffusivity, and density. It concludes with examples that illustrate how the various considerations in testing are successfully used to solve practical thermomechanical processing problems.
Image
Published: 15 June 2019
Fig. 17 Fracture toughness comparisons of aluminum alloys 2024, 2124, 7075, and 7475. Aluminum alloys 2124 and 7475 are tougher versions of alloys 2024 and 7075. High-purity metal (low iron and silicon) and special processing techniques are needed to optimize toughness in these materials
More
Book: Fatigue and Fracture
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 19
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1996
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v19.a0002406
EISBN: 978-1-62708-193-1
... of one high-toughness aluminum alloy (7475-T7351) are shown in Table 4 . Typical room-temperature yield strength and plane-strain fracture toughness values for several high-strength aluminum alloys Table 3 Typical room-temperature yield strength and plane-strain fracture toughness values...
Abstract
This article provides an overview of fatigue and fracture resistance of aluminum alloys. It discusses the characteristics of aluminum alloy classes and the fracture mechanics of aluminum alloys. The article tabulates relative stress-corrosion cracking ratings for high-strength wrought aluminum products. It analyzes the selection of various alloys for stress-corrosion cracking resistance, including aluminum-lithium alloys, copper-free 7XXX alloys, and casting alloys. The article presents a list of typical tensile properties and fatigue limit of aluminum alloys. It also describes the effects of composition, microstructure, thermal treatments, and processing in fatigue crack growth of aluminum alloys.
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 10 (a) The decrease in fracture strain with increase of volume percent of micron-size intermetallic particles for a super-purity aluminum matrix and an Al-4Mg matrix. (b) A comparison of high-purity 7050 aluminum sheet, 7475 sheet, and a 7 xxx -series aluminum alloy. Tear strength
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 10 Critical stress intensity factor, K c , vs. tensile yield strength for 1.0 to 4.7 mm (0.040 to 0.188 in.) aluminum alloy sheet. Improved alloy 7475 is compared to other commercial alloys. Source: Ref 10
More
Image
Published: 15 June 2019
Fig. 21 Critical stress-intensity factor, K c , vs. tensile yield strength for 1.0 to 4.7 mm (0.040 to 0.188 in.) aluminum alloy sheet. Improved alloy 7475 is compared to other commercial alloys. Source: Ref 43
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 25 Variations in fatigue striation spacing. (a) Spectrum-loaded fatigue fracture in a 7475-T7651 aluminum alloy test coupon showing an increase in striation spacing due to higher alternating stress. (b) Local variation in fatigue striation spacing in a spectrum-loaded 7050-T7651 aluminum
More
1