1-20 of 2106

Search Results for alloy content

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 1 Hardness and electrical resistivity versus alloy content for silver alloy contacts More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 1 Hardness and electrical resistivity versus alloy content for silver alloy contacts More
Image
Published: 01 October 2014
Fig. 14 Influence of alloy content on hardness of quenched and tempered gray iron test castings. Castings were normalized to the same hardness range before being austenitized for hardening and were oil quenched from 850 °C (1560 °F). More
Image
Published: 01 October 2014
Fig. 13 Effect of alloy content and section thickness on hardness after normalizing More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 48 Thermal diffusivity of tool steels as depending on alloy content at 100 °C (210 °F). Curves according to Eq 17 and Table 20 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 10 Matrix alloy content in M2 after austenitizing and quenching. a, annealed condition More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 2 Hardness and electrical resistivity versus alloy content for platinum contacts More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 3 Hardness and electrical resistivity versus alloy content for palladium contacts More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 6 Effect of alloy content on martensite start (M s ) temperature of binary alloys. Tantalum has the least effect, while iron depresses the M s at the greatest rate. These rates correlate with strengthening in β-stabilized systems. More
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Fig. 2 Effect of alloy content on crack sensitivity of select binary aluminum alloys More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 11 Effect of alloy content and austenitization temperature on the midpoint (50% transformed) of the transformation of austenite in a low-alloy and a high-alloy iron. Source: Ref 12 More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 15 Influence of alloy content on hardness of quenched and tempered gray iron test castings. Castings were normalized to the same hardness range before being austenitized for hardening and were oil quenched from 850 °C (1560 °F). More
Image
Published: 31 August 2017
Fig. 13 Effect of alloy content and section thickness on hardness after normalizing More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 8 Corrosion rates as a function of total alloy content for uranium alloys in various chloride-containing solutions exposed to air. Data from Ref 20 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 15 Distribution of mechanical properties and carbon and alloy contents for alloy steel castings. (a) Cr-Mo-V steel, 1.00Cr-1.00Mo-0.25V, normalized and tempered; 25 heats. (b) Cr-Mo steel, 1.00Cr-1.00Mo, normalized and tempered; 25 heats. (c) Nickel steel, 0.20C-2.25Ni, normalized More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 75 Effect of molybdenum content on K Iscc for alloy steels. These data are for steel with a yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) in an aqueous 0.5% acetic acid solution saturated with hydrogen sulfide. Solid circles denote heats with vanadium additions. Source: Ref 126 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 9 Influence of alloy A356-T6 iron content on fatigue life. From Ref 27 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 7 Comparison of stoichiometric carbon content and average alloy carbon content in conventional and PM HSS More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 8 Comparison of stoichiometric carbon content and average alloy carbon content in conventional and PM cold working tool steels and corrosion resistant PM steels More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 7 Chromium and nickel content in Alloy Casting Institute standard grades of heat-and corrosion-resistant cast steels. These letters are the second letter in the designation. See text for details. More