1-20 of 775

Search Results for abrasive wear testing

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Book Chapter

By Jeffrey A. Hawk
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003283
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... Abstract The article provides a discussion on the parameters influencing abrasive wear and the elements and standards of abrasion wear tests. It emphasizes the general test procedures, advantages, and limitations of various types of abrasive wear testing. Wear testing for scratch wear, dry...
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 1 (a) Schematic of standard abrasive wear test, ASTM G65. (b) Wear scar on typical specimen More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 5 Mass loss versus test time in abrasive wear test for carburized 8620-grade steel heat treated to three different retained austenite contents: A = 37%, B = <6%, and C = 23%. Source: Ref 6 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 6 Abrasive wear test (ASTM G65, dry sand/rubber wheel; 130 N, or 7 lbf; 200 ± 5 rpm; 2000 revolutions) results for cobalt-base alloys manufactured via hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and casting routes. Rounded silica sands were used at a flow rate of 330 g/min with 85% size distribution More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 7 Abrasive wear test (ASTM G65, dry sand/rubber wheel; 130 N, or 7 lbf; 200 ± 5 rpm; 2000 revolutions) results versus carbon content for cobalt-base alloys manufactured via hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and casting routes. Rounded silica sands were used at a flow rate of 330 g/min with 85 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 24 Abrasive impact wear testing equipment. Reprinted from Ref 6 with permission from Elsevier More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 6 Results of abrasive wear resistance tests. Data points 6C, 6M, 6F, 12C, 12M, and 12F equal grades containing 6 and 12% Co with coarse, medium, and fine grain size. Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 16 Photograph of a wear scar produced by the ASTM G65 abrasion test More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 13A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2003
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v13a.a0003630
EISBN: 978-1-62708-182-5
... ). documented an inverse relationship between abrasion rate and annealed hardness for pure metals ( Fig. 2 ). Khruschov also tested steels of varying hardness and found an inverse linear relationship between wear and hardness, although the slope of the equation was different than that for pure metals. Fig...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003279
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... of material removal under abrasive conditions. Testing for Wear and Surface Damage of Various Kinds Because wear and surface damage take on many different forms, several articles on wear and surface damage testing have been included in this Volume. Wear is a form of mechanically induced surface damage...
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006392
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
..., microstructure, surface treatment, and surface finish of steel are also considered. The article discusses the types, wear testing, wear evaluation, and hardness evaluation of abrasive wear. It describes the selection criteria of steels for wear resistance. The article also describes the importance of hardness...
Book Chapter

By Peter J. Blau
Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1998
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.a0003242
EISBN: 978-1-62708-199-3
... and impact wear in printing presses, or erosive wear and abrasive wear on extrusion machine screws for plastics. Sometimes wear can operate in the presence of corrosive or chemically-active environments, and synergistic chemo-mechanical effects are possible. Selection of appropriate wear test methods begins...
Book Chapter

By Allen J. Fuller, Jr.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006406
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... in cases of scoring ( Fig. 4 ) and abrasive wear ( Fig. 5 ). However, in testing where seizure was the wear mode of concern, higher retained austenite contents actually resulted in seizure at lower loads ( Fig. 6 ) ( Ref 5 , 6 ). Because of this seemingly contradictory behavior, experimentation...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006390
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... , 20 , 21 , 22 Fig. 6 Abrasive wear test (ASTM G65, dry sand/rubber wheel; 130 N, or 7 lbf; 200 ± 5 rpm; 2000 revolutions) results for cobalt-base alloys manufactured via hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and casting routes. Rounded silica sands were used at a flow rate of 330 g/min with 85...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006420
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... The primary reason for boriding metals is to increase wear resistance against abrasion and erosion. Different comparative and standardized wear tests are used to characterize borided surfaces. Er and Par published hardness and wear resistance results for boronized and unboronized specimens of AISI 1008...
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 1A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 August 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v01a.a0006348
EISBN: 978-1-62708-179-5
... <xref rid="a0006348-ref2" ref-type="bibr">(Ref 2)</xref> In general, unalloyed pearlitic CG iron incurs approximately one-half of the wear of unalloyed pearlitic gray cast irons when exposed to scarring or abrasion conditions. Hrusovsky ( Ref 3 ) showed that the average scar width in low friction wear pin-on-disc tests was 45% less...
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006416
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... <xref rid="a0006416-ref2" ref-type="bibr">(Ref 2)</xref> In general, unalloyed pearlitic CG iron incurs approximately one-half of the wear of unalloyed pearlitic gray cast irons when exposed to scarring or abrasion conditions. Hrusovsky ( Ref 3 ) showed that the average scar width in low friction wear pin-on-disc tests was 45% less...
Book Chapter

By Linmao Qian, Lei Chen, Liang Jiang
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 18
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 December 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006387
EISBN: 978-1-62708-192-4
... wear test, ASTM G65. As shown in Fig. 1(a) , the test involves loading a specimen against a rotating rubber-rimmed wheel while a flow of abrasive sand is directed at the contact zone. This test is widely used by industry to assist in selecting materials for abrasive wear service. Choices of loads...
Book Chapter

By Raymond G. Bayer
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002474
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
... of the system nature of wear, rankings of materials in terms of their wear resistance often change with the nature of the wear applications or the nature of the wear test used to determine the rankings. For example, rankings obtained from abrasive wear tests are typically not the same as those obtained from...
Book Chapter

By Rebecca Tuszynski
Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 November 1995
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.emde.a0003030
EISBN: 978-1-62708-200-6
... for an application or to investigate a particular wear process. It describes the wear tests conducted with/without abrasives and explains the concept of PV limit (where P is contact pressure and V is velocity). The article concludes with references and tables of friction and wear test data for polymeric materials...