1-20 of 1199

Search Results for abrasive materials

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 1 Typical hardness of abrasive materials and some work materials More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 5 Typical hardness values of hard/abrasive materials and some work materials More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 3 Bearings that failed because of wear by abrasive material in the bearing. (a) Needle-roller bearing. Note that flats have been worn on the rollers. (b) Abrasive wear caused by natural diamond dust (≤5 μm) that was deliberately introduced into the lubricant in the laboratory. Deep More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 30 Bearings that failed because of wear by abrasive material in the bearing. (a) Needle-roller bearing. Note that flats have been worn onto the rollers. (b) Abrasive wear caused by natural diamond dust (≤5 μm) that was deliberately introduced into the lubricant in the laboratory. Deep More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 15 Depth of cut results for different materials (60-grit garnet abrasive; 0.91 kg/min, or 2 lb/min, abrasive flow rate; 0.51 mm, or 0.020 in., waterjet diameter; 152 mm/min, or 6 in./min, traverse speed). Source: Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Rhode More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 14 Abrasive wear resistance of different materials as a function of bulk hardness. fcc, face-centered cubic More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 4 (a) Abrasive wear of ductile materials, involving plastic deformation followed by plowing or cutting. (b) Abrasive wear of brittle materials, involving fracture and delamination. (c) and (d) Worn surface of 304 stainless steel. (e) Worn surface of SiCp-reinforced magnesium-matrix More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 5 Model for abrasive wear of ductile materials More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 1 Qualitative materials map. Dominating micromechanisms of abrasive wear with respect to material fracture toughness and hardness. MMC, metal-matrix composite; FTC, fused tungsten carbide. Source: Ref 12 More
Book Chapter

By Ted Kostilnik
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 5
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v05.a0001228
EISBN: 978-1-62708-170-2
... Abstract Mechanical cleaning systems are used to remove contaminants of work surface by propelling abrasive materials through any of these three principal methods: airless centrifugal blast blade- or vane-type wheels; compressed air, direct-pressure dry blast nozzle systems; or compressed-air...
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 1A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 August 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v01a.a0006348
EISBN: 978-1-62708-179-5
... by contact with metallic (shots, swarf) or nonmetallic abrasive materials; and erosive wear. The article discusses general wear characteristics of gray iron, compacted gray iron, and ductile iron. It provides information on the brake lining chemistry effects, graphite morphology effects, normal cast iron...
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 3 Effect of abrasive hardness relative to material hardness on abrasive wear, showing the wear transition as wear surface becomes as hard as the abrasive More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 1A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 August 2017
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v01a.a0006305
EISBN: 978-1-62708-179-5
... Abstract The high-alloyed white irons are primarily used for abrasion-resistant applications and are readily cast into the parts needed in machinery for crushing, grinding, and handling of abrasive materials. This article discusses three major groups of the high-alloy white cast irons: nickel...
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 4 Microscopic mechanisms of material removal between abrasive particles and the surface of materials. Source: Ref 6 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 9 Abrasion resistance versus hardness for various material types in high-stress pin abrasion tests (silicon carbide abrasive). Source: Ref 6 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 10 Abrasion resistance of PCD, PCBN, and other cutting tool materials. Machining parameters: depth of cut = 1.0 mm (0.040 in.); feed rate = 0.32 mm/rev (0.013 in./rev); approach angle = 45°; top rake = 0°; clearance = 6°; tool nose radius = 0.8 mm (0.030 in.); dry, no coolant. Workpiece More
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 20 Interactions in the grinding zone. (a) Abrasive/work cutting (material removal process). (b) Abrasive/work plowing (material displacement process). (c) Abrasive/work sliding (surface modification process). (d) Chip/bond sliding. (e) Chip/work sliding. (f) Bond/work sliding. See text More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 6 Cut edge of a composite material after sectioning with an abrasive cut-off saw. The composite was mounted using a Rhodamine-B-dyed epoxy resin and viewed using epi-fluorescence, 390–440 nm excitation, 25× objective. More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 4 Microscopic mechanisms of material removal between abrasive particles and the surface of materials. Source: Ref 6 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 9 Abrasion resistance versus hardness for various material types in high-stress pin abrasion tests (silicon carbide abrasive). Source: Ref 6 More