1-20 of 1950

Search Results for Surface finish

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Book: Machining
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 16
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1989
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v16.a0002119
EISBN: 978-1-62708-188-7
... Abstract This article distinguishes between a surface finish and a surface texture. It provides information on the surface integrity technology that describes and controls the many possible alterations produced in a surface layer during manufacture, including their effects on material...
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1998
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.a0003190
EISBN: 978-1-62708-199-3
... Abstract Both surface finish and surface integrity must be defined, measured, and maintained within specified limits in the processing of any product. Surface texture is defined in terms of roughness, waviness, lay, and flaws. This article illustrates some of the designations of surface...
Book Chapter

By Eric W. Brooman
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 20
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1997
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002494
EISBN: 978-1-62708-194-8
... Abstract This article presents general design principles for different types of surface-finishing processes, such as cleaning, organic coatings, and inorganic coatings applied by a variety of techniques. It discusses the factors that influence the selection of surface-finishing processes...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 5
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v05.a0001239
EISBN: 978-1-62708-170-2
... Abstract Thermal phenomena play a key role in the mechanics of surface finishing processes. This article provides information on the analysis and measurement of temperatures and associated thermal damage generated by finishing processes that are essential to the production of engineered...
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Desk Editions
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 November 1995
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.emde.a0003055
EISBN: 978-1-62708-200-6
... grinding machine tool factors machining operational factors slicing and slotting wheel selection factors work material factors CERAMICS ARE FINISHED before final use to meet shape, size, finish or surface, and quality requirements. The extent of finishing depends on the application...
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 3 Surface trace and surface finish of four identically machined metals and alloys. (a) Type 316 SS. (b) High-purity depleted uranium. (c) U-6Nb alloy. (d) U-0.75Ti alloy (age-hardened to 43 HRC). Identical test conditions include cutoff (0.8 mm, or 0.03 in.), drive speed (0.25 mm/s More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 12 Comparison of theoretical surface finish with actual surface produced with cermet tool. Theoretical value = f 2 /8 R , where f = feed rate and R = tool nose radius. Machining parameters: cutting speed, 200 m/min (650 sfm); depth of cut, 2.0 mm (0.080 in.). Workpiece: 4135 steel More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 7 Surface finish improvement produced by TEA etchant. The initial surface was produced with a standard etchant. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 17 Effect of surface finish on surface heat-transfer coefficient during water quenching. (a) 120, (b) 400, and (c) 600 grade. Note: 600 grade is the smoothest finish, and 120 grade is the roughest. Source: Ref 42 More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 4 Effect of interlayer thickness and base-metal surface finish on creep rupture of solid-state-welded silver joints between nonplastically deforming base metals More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 10 Surface finish and weld profile possible with stationary-shoulder friction stir welding in fillet welding. Courtesy of Jonathan Martin, The Welding Institute More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 5 Typical surface finish obtained using aluminum oxide abrasive. Curves illustrate the range of results obtainable by pressure and abrasive size variations. The exact results will be influenced by material differences, nozzle selection, and other variables. RMS, root mean square More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 4 Typical surface finish obtained using aluminum oxide abrasive. Curves illustrate the range of results obtainable by pressure and abrasive size variations. The exact results will be influenced by material differences, nozzle selection, and other variables. RMS, root mean square More
Image
Published: 01 January 1994
Fig. 2 Typical ranges of surface finish from common production processes. Higher or lower values may be obtained under various conditions. More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 8 Effect of partial spheroidization on surface finish and tool life in subsequent machining of 5160 steel. (a) Annealed (pearlitic) microstructure (hardness: 241 HB) and surface finish of flange after machining of eight pieces. (b) Tool life between grinds, min. (c) Partially spheroidized More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 5 Effects of lubrication conditions on (a) punch wear and (b) surface finish as a function of number of mild steel extrusions performed using a steel punch. Source: Ref 42 , adapted from Ref 11 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 40 Effect of surface finish on load to cause scoring More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 10 Comparison of surface finish of gas cut specimens. (A) Proper speed, preheat, and cutting oxygen pressure. Note clean face and nearly straight drag lines. (B) Proper speed and cutting-oxygen pressure, too much preheat. Note excessive slag and rounding of top edge. (C) Proper preheat More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 2 Surface finish achievable through various machining operations More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 31 Surface finish modification factor vs. tensile strength or Brinell hardness for different surface finishes. Adapted from Ref 90 More