Search Results for Support

Fig. 43 TEM bright-field image showing two types of particles on a carbon support film. Unknown particle denoted by X is a single crystal, as indicated by the bend contours that cross it. More

Fig. 22 Steel clutch-drive support assembly that failed in service after a taper pin fractured. The pin fractured because of a loose fit between components. (a) Drive support assembly. Section A-A shows the break in the small end of the taper pin (arrow). (b) Fractured pin; note axial grinding More

Fig. 29 Lamellar tearing at root of weld for shroud-support ring. More

Fig. 8 Improper support by a shrink-fitted bushing and a tension overload combined to crack this coining die of type O1 tool steel. More

Fig. 4 Complex ballast tank with piping and support structures. Courtesy of Naval Research Laboratory More

Fig. 13 (a) Lacing bars bracing a channel vertical support. The edges of the lacing bars, crevices, and rivet heads are difficult to prepare and paint properly. (b) Box configuration. Riveted chords that have one or two sides partially enclosed with lattice bars create difficult access More

Fig. 1 (a) Localized coating failures at stair support steel welds. (b) Base plate and anchor bolt corrosion; localized coating failure of column More

Fig. 9 Support fingers to transfer very short parts (e.g., valve-spring retainers) or stepped parts at high production speeds. Parts are supported between the support fingers and the kickout pins during kickout. Courtesy of M. van Thiel, Nedschroef Herentals N.V. More

Fig. 30 Fuselage engine support forging, showing original and revised parting line locations. The revision restricted all of the forging impressions to one die. See Example 8. Dimensions in figure given in inches Item Preferred forging Material Aluminum alloy 7075 (a) Heat More

Fig. 19 Close-tolerance attachment support forging that made use of tilting of the die impression to reduce draft. Views of the forging are shown in (a) and (b); forging positions are shown in (c). See Example 5. Dimensions in figure given in inches. Item Close-tolerance forging More

Fig. 2 Conventional forging for landing gear support beam fittings, with ribs and webs designed to enhance rigidity and with end bosses designed for load support. Dimensions given in inches More

Fig. 18 No-draft, close-tolerance aluminum alloy forging for a stabilizer support fitting. Detail A shows a rib 0.125 in. wide with an h : w ratio of 23 to 1. Dimensions given in inches More

Fig. 19 Conventional alloy A-286 support strut forging with a thin rib (1.3 to 1.8 mm, or 0.05 to 0.07 in., wide) having a maximum rib h : w ratio of 6 to 1 (section A-A). Dimensions given in inches More

Fig. 25 Close-tolerance, no-draft aluminum latch support forging that required minimum machining. See Example 2 . Dimensions in figure given in inches Item No-draft forging Material Aluminum alloy 7075 (QQ-A-367) (a) Heat treatment (temper) T6 (a) Mechanical properties More

Fig. 14 Aluminum alloy doubler forging for wing skin pylon support that was designed as (a) a blocker-type forging and as (b) a conventional forging, with alterations in corner and fillet radii to adapt it to the forging process. See Example 3 . Dimensions in figure given in inches More

Fig. 16 Conventional aluminum alloy engine removal door support forging for which size of fillets was standardized to simplify diesinking. See Example 5 . Dimensions in figure given in inches Item Conventional forging (revised) Material Aluminum alloy 7075 (a) Heat More

Fig. 9 Close-tolerance, no-draft aluminum alloy latch support forging, shown (a) after removal of flash and (b) with forging flash fin attached. See Example 6 . Dimensions given in inches. More

Fig. 12 Simple support tool and parts made with it More

Fig. 13 Bathtub measuring ∼1500×1000 mm (60×40 in.) and the corresponding support tool More

Fig. 4 Single-cut flat bar shearing with holddown and no rear support, and with rear support More