Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
Schaeffler diagram
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 49 Search Results for
Schaeffler diagram
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 2 Schaeffler diagram showing the amount of ferrite and austenite present in weldments as a function of chromium and nickel equivalents. Source: Ref 1
More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 11 Illustration of use of the Schaeffler diagram for estimating the microstructure for welds in which 310 stainless steel is deposited onto a low-alloy steel
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 3 Schaeffler diagram for determining the phases formed in an alloy based on its chemical composition ( Ref 3 )
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Fig. 23 Schaeffler diagram for stainless steel weld metal. A, austenite; F, ferrite; M, martensite. Point 100 is ASTM A 387A steel. Example: Point X on the diagram indicates the equivalent composition of type 318 (316 Cb) weld deposit containing 0.07% C, 1.55% Mn, 0.57% Si, 19.02% Cr, 11.87
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Fig. 40 Prediction of weld metal composition from the Schaeffler diagram. A, austenite; F, ferrite, M, martensite. See text for details. Source: Ref 33
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Fig. 1 The Schaeffler diagram used for predicting weld microstructure using type 309 to join type 304 stainless steel to carbon steel. See text for details.
More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1993
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06.a0001407
EISBN: 978-1-62708-173-3
... by microstructure and are described as ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, or duplex. The article illustrates compositional ranges of the ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, and duplex alloys in the Schaeffler diagram. It describes the metallurgical aspects of welded stainless steels to be considered for particular...
Abstract
Stainless steels are an important class of engineering alloys used in both wrought and cast form for a wide range of applications and in many environments. This article aids in the selection of stainless steels based on weldability and service integrity. Stainless steels are classified by microstructure and are described as ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, or duplex. The article illustrates compositional ranges of the ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, and duplex alloys in the Schaeffler diagram. It describes the metallurgical aspects of welded stainless steels to be considered for particular engineering applications and service conditions. The article discusses the microstructural evolution of the weld metal and the heat-affected zone, susceptibility to defect formation during welding, mechanical and corrosion properties, and weld process tolerance.
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 5 Schaeffler (constitution) diagram used to predict the amount of δ-ferrite that is obtained during elevated-temperature forging or welding of austenitic/ferritic stainless steels. A, austenite; M, martensite. WRC, Welding Research Council. Source: Ref 4
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 30 Revised Schaeffler (constitution) diagram used to predict the amount of δ-ferrite that will be obtained during elevated-temperature forging or welding of austenite/ferritic stainless steels. A, austenite; M, martensite. WRC, Welding Research Council. Source: Ref 64
More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 3 DeLong constitution diagram for stainless steel weld metal. The Schaeffler austenitic boundary is included for reference. WRC, Welding Research Council; Austenite + Martensite. Source: Ref 7
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 27 Modified Schaeffler constitution diagram for stainless steels. The compositions of the ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, and duplex alloys are superimposed on this diagram.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Fig. 2 DeLong constitution diagram for stainless steel weld metal. The Schaeffler austenite-martensite boundary is included for reference.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1993
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06.a0001414
EISBN: 978-1-62708-173-3
.... The Schaeffler diagram is particularly useful when examining what filler metal is suitable for joining dissimilar metals. The example in Fig. 1 shows the joining of a carbon steel (point A) to a type 304 austenitic stainless steel (point B) using type 309 as the filler metal (point D). Point C shows what...
Abstract
This article briefly describes the welding of various stainless steels to dissimilar steels. The stainless steels include austenitic stainless steels, ferritic stainless steels, and martensitic stainless steels. The dissimilar steels include carbon and low-alloy steels. In addition, the article provides information on the cladding of austenitic stainless steel to carbon or low-alloy steels.
Book: Powder Metallurgy
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 7
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 September 2015
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v07.a0006067
EISBN: 978-1-62708-175-7
.... Such prediction is possible with the help of a diagram known as a Schaeffler diagram , an example of which is shown in Fig. 3 , along with a set of commonly accepted equations for chromium and nickel equivalents ( Ref 3 ). Fig. 3 Schaeffler diagram for determining the phases formed in an alloy based...
Abstract
Stainless steels are primarily alloys of iron and chromium. They are grouped into five families, primarily based on their microstructure: ferritic, austenitic, martensitic, duplex, and precipitation hardening. Three out of the five families of stainless steels, namely, austenitic, ferritic, and martensitic, are well suited for manufacture via conventional powder metallurgy (PM) processes. This article presents the iron-chromium partial phase diagram to illustrate the changes in the temperature range when pure iron is alloyed with chromium. It describes AISI and UNS numbering systems, which are used as an identification system for stainless steels. The article tabulates the material designations of stainless steels in accordance with the Metal Powder Industries Federation. It also details the characteristics and chemical composition of wrought and PM stainless steels.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1993
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06.a0001434
EISBN: 978-1-62708-173-3
... precipitation-hardening stainless steel Schaeffler diagram shielded-metal arc welding stainless steel welding STAINLESS STEELS can be defined as alloys that contain at least 10.5% Cr, no more than 1.5% C, and more iron than any other single element. There are five major families of stainless steels...
Abstract
This article addresses consumable selection and procedure development for the welding of stainless steels. The WRC-1992 diagram and the Schaeffier diagram, are used to illustrate the rationale behind many filler-metal choices. The article discusses the basic metallurgy and base metals of five major families of stainless steels: martensitic stainless steels, ferritic stainless steels, austenitic stainless steels, precipitation-hardening (PH) stainless steels, and duplex ferritic-austenitic stainless steels. Stainless steels of all types are weldable by virtually all welding processes. The article describes the common arc welding processes with regard to procedure and technique errors that can lead to loss of ferrite control with the common austenitic stainless steel weld metals that are designed to contain a small amount of ferrite for protection from hot cracking. The arc welding processes include shielded-metal arc welding, gas-tungsten arc welding, and gas-metal arc welding.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1993
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06.a0001442
EISBN: 978-1-62708-173-3
Abstract
Hardfacing is a form of surfacing that is applied for the purpose of reducing wear, abrasion, impact, erosion, galling, or cavitation. This article describes the deposition of hardfacing alloys by oxyfuel welding, various arc welding methods, laser welding, and thermal spray processes. It discusses the categories of hardfacing alloy, such as build-up alloys, metal-to-metal wear alloys, metal-to-earth abrasion alloys, tungsten carbides, and nonferrous alloys. A summary of the selection guide for hardfacing alloys is presented in a table. The article describes the procedures for stainless steel weld cladding and the factors influencing joint integrity in dissimilar metal joining. It concludes with a discussion on joining carbon and low-alloy steels to various dissimilar materials (both ferrous and nonferrous) by arc welding.
1