1-20 of 314 Search Results for

Peel tests

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 9 Peel testing. (a) Schematic illustration of the peel test. Source: Ref 23 . (b) Typical peel test load-displacement curve for a sample fabricated with an optimized parameter set versus a nonoptimized parameter set More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 9 Peel test applied to ultrasonic additive manufacturing builds. (a) Schematic of floating roller peel test. Source: Ref 10 . (b) Typical peel test force-displacement curve More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 21 Example of coach peel test coupon More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 12 Peel test. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 1 Schematic of the peel test More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 2 Typical peel test specimens. (a) Stripping strength specimen (ASTM D 903). (b) Roller drum peel test specimen (ASTM D 3167). (c) T-peel test specimen (ASTM D 1876). Source: Ref 7 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2001
Fig. 9 Climbing drum peel testing for sandwich composites More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003324
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... in the measurement of adhesive joint strength. These include qualitative tests, peel tests, lap shear tests, tensile tests, and adhesive fracture mechanics tests. adhesive fracture adhesive joints lap shear test mechanical strength peel test qualitative test tensile test MOST ENGINEERING DESIGNS...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 24
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 June 2020
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v24.a0006574
EISBN: 978-1-62708-290-7
... with a discussion on the process fundamentals and process parameters of UAM. It then describes metallurgical aspects in UAM. The article provides a detailed description of a wide range of mechanical characterization techniques of UAM, namely tensile testing, peel testing, and pushpin testing. The article ends...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 31 October 2011
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06a.a0005605
EISBN: 978-1-62708-174-0
.... These methods include peel testing, push-pin testing, and microhardness/nanohardness testing. The article also reviews the issues to be addressed in maintaining UAM fabrication quality. fabrication quality machining mechanical properties metal tape metallurgical properties microhardness testing...
Image
Published: 30 November 2018
Fig. 4 Some typical bonded joints used in testing. (a) and (b) Single and double lap joint specimens for shear stresses. (c) Butt joint specimen for tensile stresses. (d) Peel test specimen for tensile and complex stress situations. Source: Ref 9 More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 9
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0009083
EISBN: 978-1-62708-177-1
... the differences in the constituents and resin intermingling. The article discusses the factors that govern the honeycomb core movement and honeycomb core crush, with illustrations. Some common tests performed on honeycomb composites to characterize the skin-to-core bond strength are the climbing drum peel...
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 5 Micrographs of an unprepared honeycomb sandwich composite structure after climbing drum peel testing showing the adhesive surface after failure and the separated honeycomb core. Dark-field illumination, 65 mm macrophotograph More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 6 (a) Micrograph of a honeycomb sandwich structure composite after climbing drum peel testing showing areas of the core remaining on the aramid fiber composite facesheet. The microcrack pattern of the composite facesheet was enhanced by the use of DYKEM Steel Red dye, which was applied More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 13 Peel adhesion testing. Source: Ref 6 More
Image
Published: 30 September 2015
Fig. 24 Immersion testing of a peeling coating sample containing polyvinyl acetate block filler shows very poor moisture resistance (the white coat is the block filler). More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 7 Specimen for testing cleavage peel (by tension loading) (ASTM D 3807) More
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 8
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003280
EISBN: 978-1-62708-176-4
... that the work of adhesion can be done by applying a large force over a small distance (uniform tension) or a small force over a large distance (as in peeling or sliding). In a similar way, the fracture threshold also depends on the mode of separation, such as tension versus shear. Therefore, an adhesion test...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1993
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06.a0001466
EISBN: 978-1-62708-173-3
..., if not all, peel-ply surfaces are inadequate for adhesive bonding. This is a contentious issue because many bonded composite structures are so thin that the laminate or honey-comb core fails first during testing, even when the bond is less than 10% effective. However, that is often not the case in service...
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 27 Tensile bars of cartridge brass: one tested to failure, showing low ductility; the other not tested. Rough “orange-peel” surface texture on the outside of the tested sample is another macroscale indication of a very large grain size. More