1-20 of 48 Search Results for

Gleeble testing

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 2 Typical specimen used for Gleeble testing More
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Fig. 19 Gleeble testing of a 6 mm (0.236 in.) diameter stainless steel bar at 1100 °C (2010 °F). (a) Sample under no-load condition (note uniformity of reproducible thermal gradient). (b) Sample under load at elevated temperatures to evaluate ductility More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 2 Gleeble test unit used for hot tension and compression testing. (a) Specimen in grips showing attached thermocouple wires and linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) for measuring strain. (b) Close-up of a test specimen. Courtesy of Duffers Scientific, Inc. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 42 The Gleeble test unit used for hot tension and compression testing. (a) Specimen in grips showing attached thermocouple and LVDT for measuring strain. (b) Close-up of a compression test specimen. Courtesy of Dynamic Systems, Inc. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 17 The Gleeble test unit used for hot tension and compression testing. (a) Specimen in grips showing attached thermocouple wires and liner variable differential transformer for measuring strain. (b) Closeup of a compression test specimen. Courtesy of Dynamics Systems, Inc. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 1 Gleeble test unit used for hot-tension and hot-compression testing. (a) Specimen in grips showing attached thermocouple wires and linear variable erential transformer (LVDT) for measuring strain. (b) Close-up of a test specimen. Courtesy of Duffers Scientific, Inc. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1993
Fig. 18 Gleeble test method. (a) Primary components. (b) Close-up view of resistance heater. (c) Programmed thermal cycle. Source: Ref 53 More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 5 Gleeble thermal mechanical testing system More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 26 A Gleeble 3800 testing system. Source: Ref 12 More
Image
Published: 15 June 2020
Fig. 10 Pushpin testing. (a) Pushpin test setup using the Gleeble. UAM, ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Source: Ref 12 . (b) Schematic of the pushpin test showing specimen dimensions. More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 6
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1993
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06.a0001431
EISBN: 978-1-62708-173-3
... and weld penetration tests, weld pool shape tests, and Gleeble testing for evaluating weld pool shape, fluid flow, and weld penetration. cold cracking cracking susceptibility fluid flow Gleeble testing hot cracking weld penetration weld pool shape weldability THIS ARTICLE describes many...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 14A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14a.a0009010
EISBN: 978-1-62708-185-6
... Abstract This article discusses two types of hot-tension tests, namely, the Gleeble test and conventional isothermal hot-tension test, as well as their equipment. It summarizes the data for hot ductility, strength, and hot-tension for commercial alloys. The article presents isothermal hot...
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 8 Typical “on-heating” deformation-resistance data obtained in Gleeble testing More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 9 Macrographs (at 2.5×) and micrographs of AISI Type 1040 carbon steel Gleeble-test samples More
Image
Published: 01 January 1987
Fig. 112 Surface of fracture obtained in test bar of low-carbon steel containing 0.041% C, 0.62% Mn, 0.008% P, 0.028% S, and 0.032% Si (Mn:S ratio, 22.1:1). The test bar was remelted in its central zone in a Gleeble test unit, solidifying in situ in its quartz sleeve. Following controlled More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 12
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v12.a0000605
EISBN: 978-1-62708-181-8
... ratios (11:1 to 68:1). The ingots were rolled to 19- and 16-mm ( 3 4 - and 5 8 -in.) plate at 1175 °C (2150 °F). The specimens shown in Fig. 109 were machined, placed within a silica sleeve in a Gleeble test unit, and remelted in the central region of the gage length. They were...
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 10 Typical Gleeble curve of reduction of area versus test temperature for an aircraft structural steel (AF 1410). At the PDT, dynamic recrystallization occurs leading to an equiaxed grain structure. Fracture appearance is ductile. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 11 Typical Gleeble curve of reduction area versus test temperature for a cobalt-base superalloy. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 12 Gleeble ductility curves for lanthanum-bearing and standard Alloy 901 tested on cooling from 1120 °C. Note that the lanthanum-bearing heat displays slightly higher ductility. Specimens represent transverse orientation on a nominal 25 cm square billet. Specimen blanks were heat treated More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 20 Micrograph of the fractured end of the specimen tested with the Gleeble at 1100 °C (2010 °F) without copper present. The fracture is transgranular. Etched with 4% picral. 55× More