Search Results for Elbows

Fig. 10 Bending device for elbows (in-plane opening mode) More

Fig. 11 Bending device for elbows (out-of-plane opening mode) More

Fig. 12 Bending device for elbows with nominal diameter 800 mm (31.5 in.) and wall thickness 50 mm (2 in.) More

Fig. 2 Hydrogen grooving of a 75 mm (3 in.) diam steel elbow. The elbow was sectioned; the top half is shown. More

Fig. 8 (a) Traditionally used Coonrad-Morrey elbow implant, the primary implant used in total elbow arthroplasty. Reprinted from Ref 126 with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc. under a Free Access option, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1758-5740.2009.00020.x More

Fig. 19 Test configuration for evaluating long-term creep failure behavior of pipe elbows. F 0 , external static force; R , pipe elbow radius; L , length of the straight ends of the elbow More

Fig. 50 Malleable iron elbow in which impingement corrosion caused leakage and failure at the bend. (a) Section through the elbow showing extent of corrosion and point of leakage. Regions A and B are locations of specimens shown in micrographs (b) and (c), respectively. (b) Micrograph More

Fig. 18 Cross sections of pipe-to-elbow welds showing stress-corrosion cracks originating from the inside surface of the weld metal and the base metal More

Fig. 14 Welded stainless steel elbow assembly that, as originally designed, cracked at the root of the weld under cyclic loading. The improved design moved the weld out of the high-stress area. Dimensions given in inches More

Fig. 31 Polyurea robotic lining of elbow for oil sands tailing lines More

Fig. 14 Principle of the crossflow elbow classifier More

Fig. 3 An aluminum elbow (alloy 356) cast by the plaster mold process to three different thicknesses to determine the effect of wall thickness. Rejections were 80% with 0.040-in. wall, 35% with 0.060-in., and 10% with 0.080-in. More

Fig. 4 Adding the webs and tapering the tapping beads in the elbow fitting (a) and the tee fitting (b) assisted in distributing the molten metal and created a favorable freezing pattern that permitted adequate feeding of all sections of these stainless steel sand castings during solidification. More

Fig. 27 Cost of a conduit elbow produced in various quantities in shell molds and in green sand molds. Pattern and core equipment costs not included More

Fig. 39 Reducer-elbow pipe weldment More

Fig. 70 Pipe elbow (a) outer and (b) inner walls. DSGW, downstream girth weld; USGW, upstream girth weld More

Fig. 71 Closer view of elbow inner surface. (a) Overview, uniform oxide scale, and corroded areas. USGW, upstream girth weld; DSGW, downstream girth weld. (b) Severe corrosion occurred around the DSGW at 12 o’clock. (c) Brittle oxide scale chipped by flow/particle impingement. (d) Mill More

Fig. 73 Corroded area of the elbow showing chipped black scale, mill manufacturing marks, and corrosion on both sides of the downstream girth weld (DSGW). The corrosion occurred where the flow angle of the fluid changed. More

Fig. 50 Malleable iron elbow in which impingement corrosion caused leakage and failure at the bend. (a) Section through the elbow showing extent of corrosion and point of leakage. Regions A and B are locations of specimens shown in micrographs (b) and (c), respectively. (b) Micrograph More

Fig. 20 View of metallographic cross sections of pipe-to-elbow welds showing stress-corrosion cracks (red arrows) originating from the inside surface of the weld metal and the base metal. ID, inside diameter More