1-20 of 722 Search Results for

Deflection

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 18 Determination of the forced deflection s * for permanent deflection of 50 μm More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 5 Double-deflection scanning system showing a line scan with only the line coil pairs, l 1 - l 1 and l 2 - l 2 , activated. More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 31 Heat-deflection temperature at 1.8 MPa (0.264 ksi) of thermoplastics according to thermomechanical testing; 5 °C/min (9 °F/min) in flexure. HDPE, high-density polyethylene; LDPE, low-density polyethylene; PC, polycarbonate; PVC, polyvinyl chloride. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 23 Theoretical load-deflection diagrams for two leaf springs. In each diagram, the dashed line represents the minimum-energy spring having the same design load and ride clearance as the spring represented by the solid line. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 5 Sequential atomic force microscopy images (contact mode, deflection image) of CP-Ti surface (etched sample, same spot). Scanning size, 5 μm; height scale, 20 nm. (a) In air. (b) Immersion in phosphate-buffered saline, 1day. (c) Two week immersion. (d) Four week immersion and after step More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 12 Compression set is tested by constant deflection by using fixture shown. More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 2 Changes of deflection at the center of the lower edge of a rectangular plate due to heating by a heat source moving along the upper edge and subsequent cooling More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 9 Relationship between length of leg and curvature of longitudinal deflection in T-section beam. Source: Ref 6 , 21 More
Image
Published: 31 October 2011
Fig. 10 Plot of heat input versus deflection for 500 × 500 mm (20 × 20 in.) low-carbon steel panels as a function of panel thickness More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 21 Change in deflection versus wheel speed and down feed in the surface grinding of D6AC steel (56 HRC) Wheel grade A46K8V Cross feed, mm/pass (in./pass) 1.25 (0.050) Table speed, m/min (ft/min) 12 (40) Depth of cut, mm (in.) 0.25 (0.010) Specimen size, mm More
Image
Published: 01 January 1989
Fig. 22 Change in deflection versus tool wearland for the face milling of 4340 steel (quenched and tempered to 52 HRC) Tool 100 mm (4 in.) diam single-tooth face mill with Carboloy 370 (C-6) carbide End cutting edge angle 5° Peripheral clearance 8° Cutting speed, m/min (ft More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 9 Effect of uphill quenching on deflection of tines. Six-tine specimen was machined from 50 × 50 mm (2 × 2 in.) bar. Similar specimens machined from 25 × 25 mm (1 × 1 in.) and 75 × 75 mm (3 × 3 in.) bars had four and eight tines, respectively. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 1 End deflection as a percentage of original thickness as cut depth increases in a 26 × 26 × 160 mm (1 × 1 × 6 in.) bar of 7010. The combined thickness of the two tines decreases. Alloy was quenched from 475 °C (890 °F) and then aged for 24 h at 120 °C (250 °F) prior to cutting. More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 21 (a) Soft area due to deflection or masking of the quench spray. (b) Microstructure of soft area More
Image