1-20 of 1067 Search Results for

AISI steels

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 12
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v12.a0000608
EISBN: 978-1-62708-181-8
... Abstract This article is an atlas of fractographs that helps in understanding the causes and mechanisms of fracture of AISI/SAE alloy steels (4xxx steels) and in identifying and interpreting the morphology of fracture surfaces. The fractographs illustrate the brittle fracture, ductile fracture...
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 21 Carbon saturation limit in austenite for common AISI steel grades, calculated using Thermo-Calc. Source: Ref 6 Compositions used in calculations of saturation limits 1018 4118 4820 5120 8620 9310 C 0.18 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 Mn 0.75 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.8 More
Image
Published: 01 October 2014
Fig. 4 Tempering behavior of corrosion resistant tool steels; AISI 420 and the nitrogen alloyed M333 (AISI 420 Mod). Source: Ref 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 3 Ductility of two AISI carbon and alloy steels determined in hot torsion tests. Arrows denote suitable hot-working temperatures. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 41 General comparison of machinability of stainless steels compared with AISI B1112. Rating based on 100% for AISI B1112 using high-speed steel tools. Source: Ref 88 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 4 Hot hardnesses of AISI hot-work tool steels. Measurements were made after holding at the test temperature for 30 min. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 5 Resistance of AISI hot-work tool steels to softening during 10 h elevated-temperature exposure as measured by room-temperature hardness. Unless otherwise specified by values in parentheses, initial hardness of all specimens was 49 HRC. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2005
Fig. 6 Ductility of two AISI carbon and alloy steels determined in hot torsion tests. Arrows denote suitable hot-working temperatures. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 74 Microstructure (picral etch, 500×) of AISI S7 tool steels with isothermal heat treatments. (a) Held at 704 °C (1300 °F) for 30 min (only a small amount of transformation before quenching). (b) Held at 704 °C (1300 °F) for 4 h (almost complete transformation to pearlite) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2003
Fig. 15 Time to failure for AISI 4340 high-strength steels with an ultimate tensile strength range of 1790–2070 MPa (260–300 ksi) using ASTM F 519, Type 1c bend specimens. Source: Ref 24 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 5 Microstructure of wrought steels. Nital etch. (a) AISI 1112, 10% pearlite, 90% ferrite + sulfides; 135 HB. 500×. (b) AISI 8620, 30% pearlite, 70% ferrite; 135 HB. 2000×. (c) AISI 8640, 50% pearlite, 50% ferrite; 170 HB. 500×. (d) AISI 8640, resulfurized 65% pearlite, 35% ferrite More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 5 Hot hardnesses of AISI hot-work tool steels. Measurements were made after holding at the test temperature for 30 min. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1998
Fig. 6 Resistance of AISI hot-work tool steels to softening during 10 h elevated-temperature exposure as measured by room-temperature hardness. Unless otherwise specified by values in parentheses, initial hardness of all specimens was 49 HRC. More
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 4 Environment-dependent component of fatigue crack growth parameter as a function of cyclic load period for AISI steel in 585 Pa water vapor at room temperature. Source: Ref 6 More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 4D
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 October 2014
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v04d.a0006000
EISBN: 978-1-62708-168-9
... Abstract This article is a compilation of tables that present information on cross-referencing of steel designations that are followed in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, and Britain to AISI/SAE. cross reference steel Cross Reference of Steels to AISI/SAE Designations Cross...
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 3 The effect of improper polishing on AISI 1010 steel. (a) “Comet tails” from improper polishing. (b) The same material polished correctly, exhibiting small manganese sulfide inclusions More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 11 Transverse fracture of an AISI 1075 steel railroad rail. Fracture nucleus (dark area near top of railhead) initiated a fatigue crack (large light area around nucleus). More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 3 Examples of preferential detection in an AISI 416 stainless steel sample. (a) Live image. (b) Preferential detection of manganese sulfides (white). (c) Preferential detection of tempered martensite (white). (d) Preferential detection of δ-ferrite (white). Sample etched using Vilella's More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 30 Jominy test data on AISI 52100 steel austenitized at 850 °C (1560 °F). More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 42 Optical micrograph of AISI 4340 steel threaded fracture surface. Arrow points to flaw. More