1-20 of 172 Search Results for

A356

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 4 Yield stress of GR A356 and MHD A356 alloys as a function of temperature. Source: Ref 4 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2017
Fig. 36 Log wear rate versus log load diagram for an A356 alloy and A356-20%SiC metal-matrix composite. Source: Ref 265 More
Image
Published: 15 June 2019
Fig. 28 Log wear rate vs. log load diagram for an A356 alloy and A356-20%SiC metal-matrix composite. Source: Ref 215 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 52 Influence of quench rate on hardness for artificially aged A356 casting alloy. Source: Ref 175 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 11 Aging curves for sand cast Al-7%Si-0.3%Mg (A356) alloy at different temperatures as a function of time. Source: Ref 25 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 13 Proposed time-temperature-transformation curve for an Al-7Si-0.3Mg (A356) alloy. Source: Ref 15 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 5 Mechanical properties of as-cast A356 alloy tensile specimens as a function of modification and grain-size More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 7 Mechanical properties of as-cast A356 alloy tensile specimens as a function of modification and grain size More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 11 Strontium-modified A356 alloy solidified with a DAS of 24 μm. (a) F temper (as-cast), (b) T6temper. Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 32 (a) Microstructure of A356–10 vol% fly ash composite. (b) Intake manifold made of such a composite More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 14 Effect of increasing hydrogen content of melt on percent elongation of A356 aluminum alloy. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 60 Dendritic shrinkage porosity in aluminum alloy A356. Shrinkage porosity is a common imperfection in cast components and also a common location for fracture initiation. (a) Fracture surface from a fatigue specimen. 30×. (b) Same specimen as in part (a) but at lower magnification (13 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 21 Prefil results on A356 benchmarked to other data (bars) More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 1 Structure of nonmodified A356 alloy solidified at 1.5 to 2 °C/s (2.7 to 3.6 °F/s). (a) Polished surface. Original Magnification: 400×. (b) Deep-etched surface. Original Magnification: 1000×. Source: Ref 18 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 2 A356 alloy modified with 156 ppm Sr and solidified at 1.5 to 2 °C/s (2.7 to 3.6 °F/s). (a) Polished surface. Original Magnification: 400×. (b) Deep-etched surface. Original magnification: 1000×. Source: Ref 18 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 3 Mechanical properties ( Q ) versus solution time ( t ) in A356-T6 alloy castings. Source: Ref 27 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 5 Pore volume fraction in A356 alloy castings. Source: Ref 34 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 7 Porosity versus freezing rate in an A356 alloy. Source: Ref 35 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 8 Effect of strontium and phosphorus on cooling curves in an A356 alloy. Source: Ref 40 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 17 Quality index of A356-T6 alloy castings at three cooling rates. Curve 1, 1.5 °C/s; curve 2, 0.5 °C/s; curve 3, 0.08 °C/s. Source: Ref 80 More