1-20 of 524 Search Results for

7075

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 2B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v02b.a0006737
EISBN: 978-1-62708-210-5
... Abstract This datasheet provides information on key alloy metallurgy, processing effects on physical and mechanical properties, and fabrication characteristics of 7075 series alloy. aluminum alloy 7075 fabrication characteristics mechanical properties physical properties Alloy...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 2B
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v02b.a0006743
EISBN: 978-1-62708-210-5
... Abstract Alloys 7175 and 7475 are high-purity versions of 7075 to improve ductility in the transverse direction of thick products. This datasheet provides information on key alloy metallurgy and processing effects on physical and mechanical properties of these 7xxx series alloys. It also...
Image
Published: 01 January 1996
Fig. 49 Fatigue-life curves for 7075-T6 and 7075-TMT. (a) Unnotched. (b) Notched, K t = 8 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 32 Aging characteristics of 7075 aluminum sheet alloys at room temperature, 0 °C (32 °F), and −18 °C (0 °F) More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 33 Artificial aging of 7075 sheet. Aging begun 17 days after solution heat treatment and quench More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 34 Effects of section size on tensile properties of 7075-T6 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 35 Effects of reheating time and temperature on tensile properties of 7075-T6 sheet More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 36 Effects of room-temperature aging interval on tensile properties of 7075-T6 sheet More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 38 Iso-yield-strength curves for alloy 7075 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 2 Typical hardness versus electrical conductivity of 7075 aluminum alloy. Typical only; not for use in acceptance or rejection. IACS, International Annealed Copper Standard. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 60 Comparison of a 100 mm (4 in.) thick 7075-T652 forging given a compression stress relief then heat treated to the T6 or T652 temper. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 66 Effect of cold work on aging kinetics of 7075 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 9 (a) Cooling curves when quenching 1.6 mm (0.06 in.) thick 7075 sheet by methods A, B, C, and D (see Table 1 ). (b) Yield strength time-temperature-property diagram for 7075-T6. Source: Ref 14 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 11 Percent maximum attainable property of 7075 and 7050 as a function of quench factor from different sources. Hatch ( Ref 14 ) and Bates ( Ref 23 ) data are percent maximum attainable yield strength, while MacKenzie ( Ref 32 and 57 ) data are percent maximum attainable hardness. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 12 Fit to Fink and Willey’s data for yield strength of a 7075-T6 aluminum alloy. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 27 C-curves of 7075-T6 determined from Jominy end-quench tests ( Ref 32 ) compared to Fink-Willey C-curves(see Fig. 9b ) More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 32 Continuous-cooling precipitation diagrams of 7075 and 7049A wrought alloys with linear cooling from solution annealing. Numbers in boxes near time scale indicate total precipitation enthalpy (Δ H ) in J/g. Circled numbers indicate Vickers hardness (HV5) after aging. Heat treatment More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 13 Heat treatment cycle for uphill-quenched 7075. Source: Ref 34 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 18 Comparison cooling rates for 12.5 mm (0.5 in.) thick wrought 7075 aluminum plate when (a) quenching with water at different temperatures and (b) quenching with different concentrations of AMS type I polymer quenchant More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 19 Effect of water temperature on the strength of 7075 plate with a thickness of 13 mm (0.5 in.) More