Fig. 13 Effect of silicon and manganese content on the oxygen content of 304L powders More

Fig. 11 Metallographic section of a component made of 304L, produced by means of 2K metal injection molding. Parts of the component have integrated hollow spheres. Source: Ref 49 More

Fig. 6 Isocorrosion diagram of type 304L stainless steel in highly concentrated H 2 SO 4 . Source: Ref 24 More

Fig. 3 Corrosion rates of 304L, 310L (2521LC), and A610 (1815LC Si) in boiling HNO 3 . Source: Ref 5 More

Fig. 28 Preferential corrosion of the 304L stainless steel layer in a composite tube. Corrosion occurs at the edge of the bolt-on casting in a primary air port and extends out toward the fire-side crown of the tube More

Fig. 31 Cracks revealed by visible dye penetrant testing in a 304L composite floor tube. Note also the cracking along the tube/membrane interface and in the membrane. More

Fig. 32 Results from constant stress SCC tests of 304L shown as a function of temperature in a hydrated mixture of Na 2 S and NaOH. Solid circles are data points for specimens that failed during the test. Open circles are for specimens that either cracked, but did not fail during the test More

Fig. 33 Cracks revealed by visible dye penetrant testing on 304L and weld overlay (WO) 625 composite tubes that form primary air-port openings. (a) Craze cracks on 304L. (b) Membrane cracks on WO625. (c), Circumferential cracks on 304L. (d) Tube-membrane weld cracks on WO625 More

Fig. 16 Type 304L stainless steel, cold rolled 90% at 25 °C (75 °F) and annealed at 600 °C (1110 °F) for 1 h. Early recrystallized grains with annealing twins in a highly “messy” matrix. Thin-foil TEM specimen prepared parallel to the rolling plane. Original magnification 21,600×. Source: Ref More

Fig. 51 Comparison of effective stress-strain curves determined for type 304L stainless steel in compression, tension, and torsion. (a) Cold-working and warm-working temperatures. (b) Hot-working temperatures. Source: Ref 66 More

Fig. 2 Comparison of effective stress-strain curves determined for type 304L stainless steel in compression, tension, and torsion. (a) Cold working and warm working temperatures. (b) Hot working temperatures. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 26 Flow curves from type 304L stainless steel torsion tests. (a) Cold and warm working temperatures. (b) Hot working temperatures. Source: Ref 88 More

Fig. 29 Comparison of effective stress-strain curves determined for type 304L stainless steel in compression, tension, and torsion. (a) Cold and warm working temperatures. (b) Hot working temperatures. Source: Ref 100 More

Fig. 42 (a) Fracture-strain data from type 304L austenitic stainless steel torsion tests and (b) estimated temperature changes during high-rate tests. Low-strain-rate ( ε ¯ ˙ = 0.01 s − 1 ) data are plotted versus the actual test temperature. High-strain-rate (10.0 s More

Fig. 47 Failed type 304L stainless steel torsion specimens from ε ¯ ˙ = 10   s − 1 tests showing evidence of flow localization. (a) 20 °C (68 °F), average γ s = 1.3. (b) 200 °C (390 °F), average γ s = 2.9. Magnification: 2×. Source: Ref 88 More

Fig. 59 Micrographs of type 304L stainless hot torsion specimens tested under various strain-rate/temperature conditions. (a) 0.01 s −1 , 800 °C (1470 °F) ( ε ¯ = 1.99 ). (b) 10 s −1 , 800 °C (1470 °F)( ε ¯ = 3.81 ). (c) 0.01 s −1 , 1000 °C (1830 °F)( ε ¯ = 3.73 More

Fig. 5 Weld cross sections produced in 304L stainless steel samples at sharp focus setting for 100 kV, 10 mA beams at a work distance of 229 mm (9 in.) and travel speed of 17 mm/s −1 (0.7 in./s) on (a) welder 1 (peak power density = 520.0 kW/mm −2 ) and (b) welder 2 (peak power density More

Fig. 7 Micrographs showing the weld cross sections in 304L stainless steel produced by (a) the development welding system at a work distance of 210 mm (8.3 in.) and a focus condition of +11 and (b) the production welding system at a work distance of 457 mm (18 in.) and at the sharp focus More

Fig. 1 Bond zone pattern typical of explosion clad metals. Materials are type 304L stainless steel and carbon steel. Original magnification: 20× More

Fig. 15 Computed temperature and flow field for (a) SS 304L at 1000 W and 19 mm/s and (b) Al 5754 at 2600 W and 74.1 mm/s. For SS 304L, levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 correspond to 1697, 1900, 2100, and 3100 K, respectively. For Al 5754, levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 correspond to 880, 1100, 1400, and 2035 K More