1-20 of 641 Search Results for

1020

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 34 Schematic of changes in creep strengthening contributions at 550 °C (1020 °F) in (a) normalized molybdenum steel and (b) normalized and tempered molybdenum steel. Source: Ref 57 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 40 Tensile ductility of AISI/SAE 1020 carbon steel as a function of strain rate and test temperature for (a) spheroidize-annealed specimens and (b) cathodically charged specimens. Curve i bounds the range of strain rates and temperatures where embrittlement was observed. Source: Ref More
Image
Published: 01 January 1990
Fig. 41 Fracture strain and hydrogen content of AISI/SAE 1020 steel as a function of charging time for tensile tests conducted at room temperature, with a strain rate of 0.05 min −1 . Source: Ref 255 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 5 Optical micrographs of 0.70% C steel wire patented at 550 °C (1020 °F) in (a) lead bath and (b) 0.25% carboxymethyl cellulose aqueous solution More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 25 End-quench hardenability curve for 1020 steel carbonitrided at 900 °C (1650 °F) compared with curve for the same steel carburized at 925 °C (1700 °F). Hardness was measured along the surface of the as-quenched hardenability specimen. Ammonia and methane contents of the inlet More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 3 Microstructure of the cross section of SAE 1020 shim stock carburized at 925 °C (1700 °F) in 1.4 wt% C (supersaturated) atmosphere carbon potential for different exposure times. (a) 30 min. (b) 2 h. (c) 4 h More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 14 End-quench hardenability curve for 1020 steel carbonitrided at three different temperatures compared with curve for the same steel carburized at 925 °C (1700 °F). Hardness was measured along the surface of the as-quenched hardenability specimen. Ammonia and methane contents More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 5 Surface of 1020 steel eroded by SiC at 80 m/s (260 ft/s) and 30° impact angle More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 Erosion rates of 1020 steel by 180 to 250 μm (7 to 10 mil) particles at 80 m/s (260 ft/s) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Exposure to vibratory cavitation of normalized AISI 1020 steel. (a) Damage after 5 min. (b) Material removal after 10 min More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 12 Typical design of a 45,360-kg (50-ton) capacity 1020 steel C-hook with a stress-relief groove at end of threads and well-proportioned radii in body. Dimensions given in inches More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 13 13,600-kg (15-ton) 1020 steel crane hook that failed in fatigue. View of a fracture surface of the hook showing beach marks. Original and improved designs for the nut and the threaded end of the hook are also shown. Dimensions given in inches More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 37 Tensile fracture of a 1020 steel showing slanted fracture intersecting the outside surface at an angle More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 38 Fractured 1020 steel showing an angled connection between a cup portion on one half of the fractured bar and a cup portion on the other half More
Image
Published: 01 January 2006
Fig. 52 Ultrahigh-carbon (UHC) steel/1020 steel laminated composite to improve impact resistance of fine-grain UHC steels. (a) Orientation of mechanical test samples taken from a laminated composite of UHC steel and 1020 steel. (b) Optical micrograph of interface in laminated composite of UHC More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 19 Comparison of short-time tempering data for 1020, 1042, and 1095 carbon steels with base hardness curves for 1020, 1050, and 1080 steels from Grange and Baughman. Source: Ref 3 , 8 More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 20 Comparison of short-time tempering data for 1020 steel (0.22C-0.81Mn-0.18Si-0.014P-0.036S-0.13Ni-0.18Cr-0.046Mo) with predictions based on Grange-Baughman base data for 1020 steel and hardness increment factors. Source: Ref 6 , 8 More
Image
Published: 09 June 2014
Fig. 23 Comparison of tempering data for 1020 steel given salt-pot and induction treatments with a prediction based on Grange and Baughman's 1020 results and hardness increment factors (alloying factors). Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Fig. 10 Spall data for low-carbon 1020 steel More
Image
Published: 01 January 1986
Fig. 108 Effects of annealing a molybdenum-implanted aluminum sample at 550 °C (1020 °F) for 100 min. (a) Bright-field micrograph showing pseudolamellar Al 12 Mo precipitates (dark areas). (b) ⟨001⟩ CBEDP from the precipitates showing two mirror symmetry planes (m). Source: Ref 114 More