1-20 of 712 Search Results for

sampling

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 7 Illustration of sampling from a distribution using a random number generator. CDF, cumulative distribution function More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 8 Illustration of the Latin hypercube sampling method. CDF, cumulative distribution function More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 10 Importance sampling focusing on (a) low values and (b) high values on a standard normal distribution More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 4 Ten samples of ten experiments plotted as a single sample of 100 points More
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 August 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11A.a0006803
EISBN: 978-1-62708-329-4
... method, and the most frequently used simulation methods, standard Monte Carlo sampling, Latin hypercube sampling, and discrete probability distribution sampling. Further, the article discusses methods developed to analyze the results of probabilistic methods and covers the use of epistemic and aleatory...
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 2 Identification of samples used for failure analysis More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 1 Intergranular corrosion. (a) Sample from a cast stainless steel neck fitting. (b) Region adjacent to the intergranular corrosion revealing extensive a-phase precipitation at grain boundaries; electrolytic etching using 10 N KOH. (c) Same area as (b) after repolishing and etching More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 4 SEM fractograph of the fracture surface on a wire sample showing cup part of a typical cup and cone fracture More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 6 Longitudinal section of the failed wire sample (unetched) showing large population of silicates and oxides More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 7 Longitudinal section of the failed wire sample (unetched) showing some silicate inclusions present as long stringers More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 8 Longitudinal section of the failed wire sample (etched with aqua regia) showing severely deformed grains in austenite More
Image
Published: 01 December 1993
Fig. 1 Tube samples as received for analysis. (a) From top to bottom, Tubes 1,2,3, and 4, showing hotside (furnace side). (b) Transverse ring section removed from a tube sample for metallographic analysis. Note the internal gouging at the 12:00 position (arrows). Nital etch. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1993
Fig. 2 Internal surface of a sample at the 12:00 position. Voids from hydrogen damage are evident beneath the internal corrosion (black arrows). Nital etch. (a) Copper deposits are visible on the internal surface (white arrows). (b) Microfissures near the internal gouging. 800×. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1993
Fig. 3 Typical microstructure of pearlite and ferrite observed in the tube samples. Nital etch. (a) 100×. (b) 800×. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1993
Fig. 6 A Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) analysis of a reference acetone sample. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1992
Fig. 2 Metallographic sample (a) and tensile test specimen (b) from the pigtail tubing. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1992
Fig. 1 Diagram showing locatons of samples taken trom the two plates. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1992
Fig. 5 SEM fractograph of sample A1H, showing intergranular microcracks. 666×. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1992
Fig. 6 SEM fractograph of sample A2V, showing intergranular microcracks typical of hydrogen-assisted cracking. 134×. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1992
Fig. 1 View of split in as-received tubing sample 1. ∼0.39×. More