Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
normalizing
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 913 Search Results for
normalizing
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 11 Plot of normal load versus critical amplitude as a function of normal slip for a crossed steel cylinder arrangement. Source: Ref 21
More
Image
in Mechanisms and Appearances of Ductile and Brittle Fracture in Metals
> Failure Analysis and Prevention
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Schematic of (a) ductile tearing along plane normal to normal stress and (b) zig-zag path of void sheet fracture along shear planes
More
Image
in Mechanisms and Appearances of Ductile and Brittle Fracture in Metals
> Failure Analysis and Prevention
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 15 Schematics of (a) ductile tearing along plane normal to normal stress and (b) zigzag path of void sheet fracture along shear planes
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Exposure to vibratory cavitation of normalized AISI 1020 steel. (a) Damage after 5 min. (b) Material removal after 10 min
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Free-body diagrams showing orientation of normal stresses and shear stresses in a shaft and the single-overload fracture behavior of ductile and brittle materials. (a) Under simple tension. (b) Under torsion. (c) Under compression loading. See text for discussion.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 50 Section normal to surface of tooth profile taken near the spalled area shown in Fig. 49(b) . The surface shows no catastrophic movement; the butterfly wings are generally parallel to the surface, but extend 0.7 mm (0.027 in.) below the surface. Microstructure is very fine acicular
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 33 Oxide-filled intergranular cracks oriented normally to the hoop stress direction in the main steam line.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Examples of the normal microstructure of the axles. Specimens were taken well away from the fracture surface. (a) Axle 2028. Etched with 2% nital. 100×. (b) Axle 2028. Etched with 4% picral. 500×. (c) Axle 1611. Same etchant and magnification as (a). (d) Axle 1611. Same etchant
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 29 Bands of normalized wear rate versus hardness for low-stress scratching, high-stress gouging, and impact wear. Low-stress scratching shows the strongest dependence on hardness, while impact abrasion shows the least. The scatter in the impact abrasion data suggests a growing
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 16 Relation between initial period of metal-to-metal contact and normal load
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 19 Influence of normalized pressure on stress cycles (Δ ≥ 1.5, P o = 2.7 GPa, or 0.39 × 10 6 psi)
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 20 Influence of normalized coating thickness on the performance of HVOF coating on 440C steel substrate (σ = 1840 MPa, or 267 ksi)
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Diagram of impact wear modes. (a) normal impact; (b) compound impact (with sliding); and (c) compound impact (tangential contact). v , velocity
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 18 Impact crater area vs. compressive residual stress for impacts normal to the lay and compressive stresses perpendicular to the grinding direction (○), and for impacts perpendicular to the lay and compressive stresses parallel to the grinding direction (●), using sintered reaction
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Definition of (a) average normal stress and (b) average shear stress. F , force (load); V , force parallel to area.
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 7 Free-body diagrams showing orientation of normal stresses and shear stresses in a shaft and the single-overload fracture behavior of ductile and brittle materials. (a) Under simple tension. (b) Under torsion. (c) Under compression loading
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Ductile tearing on a plane of maximum normal stress at the tip of a compact tension specimen. Material is O1 tool steel. Source: Ref 35
More
Image
in Mechanisms and Appearances of Ductile and Brittle Fracture in Metals
> Failure Analysis and Prevention
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 2 Schematic figure showing the effect of a normal stress, σ, and a shear stress, τ, on a crystalline material. Application of a normal stress increases the interplanar distance and ultimately results in fracture. Application of a shear stress causes the planes of atoms to slide over each
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 37 Microstructures of failed crankcase shown in Fig. 36 . (a) Normal flake graphite from a thick-wall section. (b) Type B rosette graphite from a thin-wall section. Both etched with picral. 200×. Source: Ref 11
More
1