1-20 of 913 Search Results for

normalizing

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 11 Plot of normal load versus critical amplitude as a function of normal slip for a crossed steel cylinder arrangement. Source: Ref 21 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Schematic of (a) ductile tearing along plane normal to normal stress and (b) zig-zag path of void sheet fracture along shear planes More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 15 Schematics of (a) ductile tearing along plane normal to normal stress and (b) zigzag path of void sheet fracture along shear planes More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Exposure to vibratory cavitation of normalized AISI 1020 steel. (a) Damage after 5 min. (b) Material removal after 10 min More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Free-body diagrams showing orientation of normal stresses and shear stresses in a shaft and the single-overload fracture behavior of ductile and brittle materials. (a) Under simple tension. (b) Under torsion. (c) Under compression loading. See text for discussion. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 50 Section normal to surface of tooth profile taken near the spalled area shown in Fig. 49(b) . The surface shows no catastrophic movement; the butterfly wings are generally parallel to the surface, but extend 0.7 mm (0.027 in.) below the surface. Microstructure is very fine acicular More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 33 Oxide-filled intergranular cracks oriented normally to the hoop stress direction in the main steam line. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Examples of the normal microstructure of the axles. Specimens were taken well away from the fracture surface. (a) Axle 2028. Etched with 2% nital. 100×. (b) Axle 2028. Etched with 4% picral. 500×. (c) Axle 1611. Same etchant and magnification as (a). (d) Axle 1611. Same etchant More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 29 Bands of normalized wear rate versus hardness for low-stress scratching, high-stress gouging, and impact wear. Low-stress scratching shows the strongest dependence on hardness, while impact abrasion shows the least. The scatter in the impact abrasion data suggests a growing More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 16 Relation between initial period of metal-to-metal contact and normal load More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 19 Influence of normalized pressure on stress cycles (Δ ≥ 1.5, P o = 2.7 GPa, or 0.39 × 10 6 psi) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 20 Influence of normalized coating thickness on the performance of HVOF coating on 440C steel substrate (σ = 1840 MPa, or 267 ksi) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Diagram of impact wear modes. (a) normal impact; (b) compound impact (with sliding); and (c) compound impact (tangential contact). v , velocity More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 18 Impact crater area vs. compressive residual stress for impacts normal to the lay and compressive stresses perpendicular to the grinding direction (○), and for impacts perpendicular to the lay and compressive stresses parallel to the grinding direction (●), using sintered reaction More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Definition of (a) average normal stress and (b) average shear stress. F , force (load); V , force parallel to area. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 7 Free-body diagrams showing orientation of normal stresses and shear stresses in a shaft and the single-overload fracture behavior of ductile and brittle materials. (a) Under simple tension. (b) Under torsion. (c) Under compression loading More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Ductile tearing on a plane of maximum normal stress at the tip of a compact tension specimen. Material is O1 tool steel. Source: Ref 35 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 2 Schematic figure showing the effect of a normal stress, σ, and a shear stress, τ, on a crystalline material. Application of a normal stress increases the interplanar distance and ultimately results in fracture. Application of a shear stress causes the planes of atoms to slide over each More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 37 Microstructures of failed crankcase shown in Fig. 36 . (a) Normal flake graphite from a thick-wall section. (b) Type B rosette graphite from a thin-wall section. Both etched with picral. 200×. Source: Ref 11 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 Application of normal format More