1-20 of 627 Search Results for

normal stress

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Schematic of (a) ductile tearing along plane normal to normal stress and (b) zig-zag path of void sheet fracture along shear planes More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 15 Schematics of (a) ductile tearing along plane normal to normal stress and (b) zigzag path of void sheet fracture along shear planes More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Definition of (a) average normal stress and (b) average shear stress. F , force (load); V , force parallel to area. More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 1 Definition of (a) average normal stress and (b) average shear stress. F , force (load); V , force parallel to area More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 15 Ductile tearing on a plane of maximum normal stress at the tip of a compact tension specimen. Material is O1 tool steel. Source: Ref 35 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 2 Schematic figure showing the effect of a normal stress, σ, and a shear stress, τ, on a crystalline material. Application of a normal stress increases the interplanar distance and ultimately results in fracture. Application of a shear stress causes the planes of atoms to slide over each More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 16 Ductile tearing on a plane of maximum normal stress at the tip of a compact tension specimen. Material is O1 tool steel. Source: Ref 11 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 2 Schematic figure showing the effect of a normal stress, σ, and a shear stress, τ, on a crystalline material. Application of a normal stress increases the interplanar distance and ultimately results in fracture. Application of a shear stress causes the planes of atoms to slide over each More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 1 Free-body diagrams showing orientation of normal stresses and shear stresses in a shaft and the single-overload fracture behavior of ductile and brittle materials. (a) Under simple tension. (b) Under torsion. (c) Under compression loading. See text for discussion. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 7 Free-body diagrams showing orientation of normal stresses and shear stresses in a shaft and the single-overload fracture behavior of ductile and brittle materials. (a) Under simple tension. (b) Under torsion. (c) Under compression loading More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 7 Free-body diagrams showing orientation of normal stresses and shear stresses in a shaft and the single-overload fracture behavior of ductile and brittle materials. (a) Under simple tension. (b) Under torsion. (c) Under compression loading More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 1 Free-body diagrams showing orientation of normal stresses and shear stresses in a shaft and the single-overload fracture behavior of ductile and brittle materials. (a) Under simple tension. (b) Under torsion. (c) Under compression loading. See text for discussion More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 18 Impact crater area vs. compressive residual stress for impacts normal to the lay and compressive stresses perpendicular to the grinding direction (○), and for impacts perpendicular to the lay and compressive stresses parallel to the grinding direction (●), using sintered reaction More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 2 Schematic stress distribution on plane normal to the oil hole 7.6 mm (0.3 in.) from the shaft surface. More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 20 Impact crater area versus compressive residual stress for impacts normal to the lay and compressive stresses perpendicular to the grinding direction (■) and for impacts perpendicular to the lay and compressive stresses parallel to the grinding direction (●), using sintered reaction More
Image
Published: 01 December 2019
Fig. 13 Normal strain rate ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and stress-rupture strengths at various temperatures (as percentage of normal strain rate UTS at room temperature). (Data from Ref 1 and 14) More
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.mech.c0048626
EISBN: 978-1-62708-225-9
... (180 to 200 ksi) with a hardness of 39 to 43 HRC, followed by cadmium plating. The bolt that failed and several that did not were examined. It was found that failure of the bolts was the result of time-dependent hydrogen embrittlement. Had the remaining bolts been torqued to the normal stress levels...
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 1 Oxide-filled intergranular cracks oriented normally to the hoop stress direction in the main steam line. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 33 Oxide-filled intergranular cracks oriented normally to the hoop stress direction in the main steam line. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 29 Bands of normalized wear rate versus hardness for low-stress scratching, high-stress gouging, and impact wear. Low-stress scratching shows the strongest dependence on hardness, while impact abrasion shows the least. The scatter in the impact abrasion data suggests a growing More