Fig. 17 17 Optical micrographs of the tube section showing the variation in grain size in Stage 3 tube (a) near the failure and (b) away from the failure More

Fig. 18 Optical micrographs of the tube section (a) near the failure showing the affected surface layer and grains and (b) intergranular cracks and corrosion path More

Fig. 17 SEM Micrographs of Pits from Inside 1988 EB More

Fig. 18 SEM Micrographs of Pits Inside 1988 MP More

Fig. 7 Micrographs and line scans of the surface layer of a nitrided Inconel 600 lead cable: (a) micrograph showing the location of point analysis and linescan; (b) Auger linescans across the surface layer; and, (c) nitrogen map. More

Fig. 9 Optical (a) and SEM (b) Micrographs of Fracture Surface Topography. Small Arrows Indicate Initiation Site ( Figure 5 ) and Double Arrows Indicate Fatigue Striations. Large Arrows Indicate Fusion Boundary (a) and Large Fusion Zone Grains (b). More

Fig. 5 Typical micrographs showing surface damage found on outer surface of some cylinders. More

Fig. 1 Micrographs of typical microstructure beneath the flame-cut edge (top) and microcracks (bottom) in the deck socket. Figure (top) is by A.V. Brandemarte, and it was also featured in the Miniature Masterpieces article in February 1999. More

Fig. 8 SEM micrographs showing fracture surfaces of longitudinal Charpy specimens from the RMS Titanic plate tested at (a) 120 °C and (b) −32 °C. Reproduced with permission of the Iron & Steelmaker. 13 More

Fig. 1 Scanning electron micrographs of the fracture surfaces of two of the failed stainless steel fixation implant devices. Note the numerous parallel striations heralding the crack advance during repeated stressings, indicative of fatigue failure. Although four different implant devices were More

Fig. 3 Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of surface fracture More

Fig. 4 Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of surface fracture A with identification of fracture initiation site More

Fig. 6 External surface of bone plate and fatigue cracks observed (SEM micrographs) More

Fig. 5 Scanning electron micrographs from both ends of screw hole showing radial markings pointing to the origin of fracture (at arrows). More

Fig. 14 Optical micrographs showing deformation bands near the surface protrusion. More

Fig. 2 Optical micrographs showing white/gray bands of surface martensite and dark underlying region of deformed pearlite in three different broken wire samples. (a) Surface martensite band approximately 65 µm thick. (b) Surface martensite band approximately 25 µm thick. (c) Surface martensite More

Fig. 3 Optical micrographs showing cold-drawn pearlitic structure in the longitudinal sections of two Z-profile wires at regions significantly away from the fracture ends. 500× More

Fig. 1 Optical micrographs of the cross section of an aluminum wire, iron screw, and brass plate in a conventional household electrical outlet assembly. (a) Overall view. (b) Wire/screw interface. (c) Wire/brass plate interface. See also Fig. 2(a) , 2(b) , 2(c) , 3(a) , 3(b) , 3(c More

Fig. 9 EPMA micrographs of typical carbide segregation in failed roll. (a) SE image. (b) BSE image showing atomic number contrast. (c) Cr x-ray dot map. (d) V x-ray dot map. (e) Mo x-ray dot map. (f) W x-ray dot map. (g) Fe x-ray dot map. (h) C x-ray dot map. 2000× More

Fig. 2 Optical micrographs of typical inclusion fields in the failed converter roller-bearing sample showing (a) stringer of brittle, angular alumina inclusions; (b) dense cluster of alumina inclusions; and (c) alumina and oxysulfides. 500× More