Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
injection molding
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 85 Search Results for
injection molding
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 25 Basic overview of the steps used in the plastic injection molding process. (a) Steps 1 to 7 of the process. (b) Schematic of the injection molding process: A, injection phase; B, pack/hold phase; C, plasticating/screw recovery phase; D, mold open/part ejection phase
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 36 Typical part defects encountered in the injection molding process. (a) Flash. (b) Short shot. (c) Splay
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 37 A-B-A co-injection molding process. (a) A, first polymer injected. (b) B, second polymer injected. (c) A, first polymer injected
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 42 Schematic of the gas-assist injection molding process. (a) Plastic injection. (b) Gas injection. (c) Part ejection
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 4 Four-cavity (2+2) family injection mold shown opened on the bench with molded parts from the mold in white ABS material. Photo courtesy of Quality Molding, Inc., Somerset, WI, USA
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 32 Images of the cavity and core geometries of an injection mold. (a) Parting line view (A-side). (b) Platen side view (A-side). (c) Side view (A-side). (d) Parting line view (B-side). (e) Platen side view (B-side). (f) Side view (B-side)
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 35 SEM fractographs of an injection-molded acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene specimen fractured by impact at ambient temperatures, illustrating parabolas of various shapes. (a) U-shaped parabola. Original magnification: 1000×. (b) Petal-shaped parabola. Original magnification: 1000×. (c) U
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 14 Rate of fatigue crack propagation of injection-molded glass-reinforced polyvinyl chloride composites containing 10 and 30 wt% glass as a function of the energy-release rate, J I . Arrows indicate the critical energy-release rate, J Ic , for each.
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 5 Rules for wall thickness and transitions in injection molded parts. Reprinted from Ref 1 with permission by Elsevier. Copyright Elsevier 2017
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 7 Rules for standing rib features on injection molded parts. Consult the material supplier for specific requirements for the materials to be utilized. Reprinted from Ref 1 with permission by Elsevier. Copyright Elsevier 2017
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 8 Design guidelines for cylindrical boss features on injection molded parts. Consult the material supplier for specific requirements for the materials to be utilized. Reprinted from Ref 1 with permission by Elsevier. Copyright Elsevier 2017
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 11 Examples of various gates utilized within an injection mold to feed and fill the part during the molding process. Reprinted from Ref 1 with permission by Elsevier. Copyright Elsevier 2017
More
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.homegoods.c0090448
EISBN: 978-1-62708-222-8
... Abstract Housings (being tested as part of a material conversion) from an electrical appliance failed during an engineering evaluation. They had been injection molded from a commercial polycarbonate/PET blend. Parts produced from the previous material, a nylon 6/6 resin, had consistently passed...
Abstract
Housings (being tested as part of a material conversion) from an electrical appliance failed during an engineering evaluation. They had been injection molded from a commercial polycarbonate/PET blend. Parts produced from the previous material, a nylon 6/6 resin, had consistently passed the testing regimen. Grease was applied liberally within the housing assembly during production. Investigation included visual inspection, 24x SEM images, micro-FTIR in the ATR mode, and analysis using DSC. No signs of material contamination were found, but the thermograms showed a crystallization of the PET resin. The grease present within the housing assembly, analyzed using micro-FTIR, was composed of a hydrocarbon-based oil, a phthalate-based oil, lithium stearate, and an amide-based additive. The conclusion was that the appliance housings failed through environmental stress cracking caused by a phthalate-based oil that was not compatible with the PC portion of the resin blend. Thus, the resin conversion was the root cause of the failures. Additionally, during the injection molding process the molded parts had been undercrystallized, reducing their mechanical strength. More importantly, the resin had been degraded, producing a reduction in the molecular weight and reducing both the mechanical integrity and chemical-resistance properties of the parts.
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.process.c0090909
EISBN: 978-1-62708-235-8
... Abstract An injection-molded PVC water-filter housing fractured in service. 75x views and visual inspection supported the conclusion that failure occurred due to fatigue crack propagation, as indicated by the presence of discontinuous crack-growth bands and their evolution. However, an initial...
Abstract
An injection-molded PVC water-filter housing fractured in service. 75x views and visual inspection supported the conclusion that failure occurred due to fatigue crack propagation, as indicated by the presence of discontinuous crack-growth bands and their evolution. However, an initial fissure was believed to have started first due to residual stresses developed during injection molding. No recommendations were made.
1