Search Results for fracture morphology

Fig. 2 Fracture morphology of fracture toughness specimen (fusion line). More

Fig. 5 Fracture morphology of the final fast fracture. More

Fig. 17 Fracture morphology of steam-generator wall in a region where regularly spaced striations typical of fatigue are evident. More

Fig. 10 Scanning electron microscope micrograph of typical eye fracture morphology consisting of woody, ductile features. 500× More

Fig. 2 Scanning electron microscope micrograph of typical eye fracture morphology consisting of woody, ductile features. 500× More

Fig. 66 Fracture morphology of steam-generator wall in a region where regularly spaced striations typical of fatigue are evident More

Fig. 3 Fracture morphology of creep crack growth composite specimen (fusion line). More

Fig. 4 Fracture morphology characteristic of a rupture. More

Fig. 5 SEM micrograph showing intergranular fracture morphology of a prematurely failed disc. 630× More

Fig. 10 SEM micrograph showing a ductile fracture morphology typical of overpressurization.756× More

Fig. 10 Scanning electron micrograph of typical eye fracture morphology consisting of woody, ductile features. Original magnification: 500× More

Fig. 2 Fracture morphology of steam-generator wall in a region where regularly spaced striations typical of fatigue are evident. More

Fig. 4 SEM images of specimens A and B, showing fracture morphology of ( a–c ) splint A and ( d–f ) splint B More

Fig. 1 Intergranular fracture morphology on field-return unit More

Fig. 18 Fracture surface of a failed steam-generator sample. The fracture morphology is characteristic of fatigue cracking, but 1 ppm of Ce − under constant extension rate testing produced this same fracture morphology in laboratory tests. The initiation site is on the inside surface More

Fig. 67 Fracture surface of a failed steam-generator sample. The fracture morphology is characteristic of fatigue cracking, but 1 ppm of Ce − under constant extension-rate testing produced this same fracture morphology in laboratory tests. The initiation site is on the inside surface More

Fig. 3 Fracture surface of a failed steam-generator sample. The fracture morphology is characteristic of fatigue cracking, but 1 ppm of Ce − under constant extension rate testing produced this same fracture morphology in laboratory tests. The initiation site is on the inside surface More

Fig. 4 SEM micrographs of typical fracture surface morphology of screw No. 1. (a) Small arrows indicate beach marks. Large arrow points to origin. 15.75×. (b) 126×. More

Fig. 5 SEM micrographs of typical fracture surface morphology of screw No. 1. (a) 630× (b) 3150×. More

Fig. 6 SEM micrographs of typical fracture surface morphology of screw No. 4. 2520×. More