Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
etchants
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 163 Search Results for
etchants
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 14 Light micrograph showing stain (arrows pointing up) from the etchant (Vilella's reagent) that seeped from the shrinkage gap (wide arrows pointing down) between the phenolic resin mount and the specimen of M2 high-speed steel
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 31 Slag in steel metal. (a) Oblong. Etchant, 2% nital. 165×. (b) Lamellar. Etchant, 2% nital. 165×. (c) Jagged irregular. Fatigue fractograph as-is. ∼15×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 36 Pulsed GMAW spot weld showing a lack of fill-in. Etchant, 50% nitric-50% acetic acid. 4×
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 48 Micrograph of weld metal microcrack. Etchant, 2% nital. 215×
More
Image
in An Environmentally Assisted Cracking Evaluation of UNS C64200 (Al–Si–Bronze) and UNS C63200 (Ni–Al–Bronze)
> Handbook of Case Histories in Failure Analysis
Published: 01 December 2019
Fig. 1 a Aluminum–silicon–bronze microstructure (etchant: alcoholic ferric chloride solution), b intergranular defect in aluminum–silicon–bronze microstructure. Vertical direction is longitudinal direction of bar
More
Image
in An Environmentally Assisted Cracking Evaluation of UNS C64200 (Al–Si–Bronze) and UNS C63200 (Ni–Al–Bronze)
> Handbook of Case Histories in Failure Analysis
Published: 01 December 2019
Fig. 2 Nickel–aluminum–bronze microstructure (etchant: alcoholic ferric chloride solution). Horizontal direction is longitudinal direction of bar
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2019
Fig. 6 SEM image revealed selective grain attack and dealloying, etchant: 45 mL nitric acid and 45 mL acetic acid. The aluminum concentration was significantly lower than in the bulk material in the area of grain attack
More
Image
in Stress Cracks in Brass Pipe Couplings
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 6 Course of crack in microstructure; etchant: copper ammonium chloride ammonium hydroxide. 100×
More
Image
in Welded Pipes with Hard Spots
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 3 Longitudinal section s—s in Fig. 2 through a hard spot. Etchant: Nital. 10 ×
More
Image
in Welded Pipes with Hard Spots
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 4 Microstructure in the weldseam, longitudinal section. Etchant: Nital. 500 ×. Normal location.
More
Image
in Welded Pipes with Hard Spots
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 5 Microstructure in the weldseam, longitudinal section. Etchant: Nital. 500 ×. Carburized locations. Hypo-eutectoid.
More
Image
in Welded Pipes with Hard Spots
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 6 Microstructure in the weldseam, longitudinal section. Etchant: Nital. 500 ×. Carburized locations. Near-eutectoid.
More
Image
in Welded Pipes with Hard Spots
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 7 Microstructure in the weldseam, longitudinal section. Etchant: Nital. 500 ×. Carburized locations. Hyper-eutectoid.
More
Image
in Welded Pipes with Hard Spots
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Processing Errors and Defects
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 8 Microstructure in the weldseam, longitudinal section. Etchant: Nital. 500 ×. Carburized locations. Hypo-eutectic cast iron.
More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 6 Light micrograph showing stain (arrows pointing up) from the etchant (Vilella’s reagent) that seeped from the shrinkage gap (wide arrows pointing down) between the phenolic resin mount and the specimen of M2 high-speed steel
More
Image
in Examination of Wires for the Manufacture of Tempered Bolts
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Design Flaws
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 1 Core structure of the wires. G. Cross sections, etchant: picral. 200 ×
More
Image
in Examination of Wires for the Manufacture of Tempered Bolts
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Design Flaws
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 2 Cross sections, etchant: picral. 200 × Core structure of the wires. S1.
More
Image
in Examination of Wires for the Manufacture of Tempered Bolts
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Design Flaws
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 3 Cross sections, etchant: picral. 200 × Core structure of the wires. S2.
More
Image
in Examination of Wires for the Manufacture of Tempered Bolts
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Design Flaws
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 4 Cross sections, etchant: picral. 200 × Edge structure of the wires. S1.
More
Image
in Examination of Wires for the Manufacture of Tempered Bolts
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Design Flaws
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 5 Cross sections, etchant: picral. 200 × Edge structure of the wires. S2.
More
1