1-20 of 411 Search Results for

crack growth

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Volume: 1
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1992
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.v01.c9001028
EISBN: 978-1-62708-214-3
... indicating mode I fatigue crack progression from the top surface, apparently due to reverse bending of the sheet. (a) 385×. (b) 1925×. After the crack was opened, examination near the crack front showed that the direction of the crack growth in the lower zone was upward and outward, indicated...
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 4 Stress-corrosion crack growth. (a) Schematic diagram of typical crack-propagation rate as a function of crack-tip stress-intensity behavior illustrating the regions of stage 1, 2, and 3 crack propagation as well as identifying the plateau velocity and the threshold stress intensity. (b More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 39 (a) Comparison of creep-fatigue crack growth rates with fatigue crack growth plotted as a function of Δ K . (b) The effect of hold time estimated for engineering structures when the creep crack growth rate is plotted as a function of ( C t ) avg More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 11 The measured crack growth rate (crack length versus time) is determined by optical measurements or fractographic evaluation in order to validate life-prediction estimates. In this example for an aircraft wing, the predicted crack growth and the actual crack growth (which is based More
Image
Published: 01 December 1992
Fig. 15 Spin-pit crack growth history of bolt hole crack in disk 1 using idle-max-idle loading. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 5 Bolt showing crack growth in fatigue until a critical length was reached. Fast fracture took place until the load dropped sufficiently to arrest the crack. Further fatigue occurred until critical conditions were reached for final fast fracture. Magnification. 2.4× More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 2 Oxidized surface of black area in flaw. Crack growth direction is from bottom to top. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 3 Intergranular fracture mode within gray area of flaw. Crack growth direction is from bottom to top. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 6 Fatigue striations and crack growth bands along varying fracture locations in the turbine blade. (a) 2-mm from crack initiation; (b) 13-mm from crack initiation region; (c) 18-mm from initiation region; (d) 26-mm from initiation. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 8 Fatigue crack growth rates through the segregated region compared to known growth rate values. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 13 Comparison between the crack growth rate from the fracture surface (hatched) and the literature results for this material More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 10 Functional dependence of ΔK eff, T on R. The fatigue crack growth data are from Wanhill and Looije. 9 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 5 Fatigue crack growth started at O; arrows indicate direction. Magnification 3 times. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 4 Fatigue crack growth in crankshaft shows beach marks. Chromium plating, about 0.010 in. thick, is indicated by arrows More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 2 Plot of rate crack growth versus cyclic stress intensity amplitude. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2019
Fig. 7 SEM micrograph showing combined SSC and HIC corrosion crack growth More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 42 Fully pearlitic steel fatigue fracture surfaces. Crack growth direction is from left to right in both images. (a) Intermediate crack growth rate (∼0.1 ∼m/cycle), and (b) low crack growth rate (∼0.001 ∼m/cycle). No fatigue striations were resolved by SEM at any crack growth rate More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 Schematic illustration of variation of fatigue-crack-growth rate, da / dN , with alternating stress intensity, Δ K , in steels, showing regions of primary crack-growth mechanisms. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 7 Pearson plot of crack-growth rate as a function of K for short surface cracks and through-cracks. Source: Ref 6 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 8 Summary of fatigue-crack-growth data for martensitic steels. Source: Ref 9 More