1-20 of 597 Search Results for

Martensite

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.bldgs.c0047694
EISBN: 978-1-62708-219-8
... martensite present in the weld area after the heat treatment. The test failures of the AISI 1080 steel wire butt-welded joints were due to martensite produced in cooling from the welding operation that was not tempered adequately in postweld heat treatment, and to poor wire-end preparation for welding...
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.process.c0047566
EISBN: 978-1-62708-235-8
... stainless steel filler metal to form a fillet between the handle and the cover. The structure was found to contain a zone of brittle martensite in the portion of the weld adjacent to the low-carbon steel handle; fracture had occurred in this zone. The brittle martensite layer in the weld was the result...
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 7 Cold deformation and grinding martensite at surface of cam lobe side. Etch: Nital. 200 × More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 7 Martensite with unaltered ledeburite network. Etched (FeCl 3 + HCl + ethanol). 100 × More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 8 Microstructure of heat affected zone. Left martensite (black) with ledeburite eutectic, right recrystallised structure. Etched (FeCl 3 + HCl + ethanol). 100 × More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 14 Microstructure of metal smeared on flange: martensite and residual austenite. Large inclusions of scale are grey. Etched (FeCl 3 + HCl + ethanol). 500 × More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 14 A band of martensite found at the woody textured fracture edge More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 2 Optical micrographs showing white/gray bands of surface martensite and dark underlying region of deformed pearlite in three different broken wire samples. (a) Surface martensite band approximately 65 µm thick. (b) Surface martensite band approximately 25 µm thick. (c) Surface martensite More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 9 Ferrite/martensite microstructure near fracture surface in H.A.Z. 1000 × More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 8 Microstructure of the new cylinder clamping rod showing tempered martensite structure, 3000× More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 12 Tempered martensite microstructure of the PH 13-8 Mo stainless steel and transgranular internal crack from the shrink link cylinder wall (Vilella's etchant, ×1000). More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 3 Grinding burn area (hard, brittle white layer of untempered martensite; Rc 54 to 56) and microcracks (arrows) on fillet surface near fatigue origin. Magnification 75 times; 2 pct nital etch. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 7 Grinding burn zone consists of untempered martensite. Magnification 100 times; 2 pct nital. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 3 Nital-etched microstructure of roll HSM #8 showing acicular martensite with retained austenite at needle interstices and white carbide phase exhibiting microcracking; magnification 500× More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 4 Nital-etched microstructure of roll HSM #14 showing acicular martensite with retained austenite at needle interstices, white carbide phase, and dark-gray graphite nodule; magnification 500× More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 5 Nital-etched microstructure of roll HSM #1 showing acicular martensite with retained austenite at needle interstices and white carbide phase exhibiting pronounced microcracking; magnification 500× More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 11 SEM Micrograph showing martensite lath structure (8000×). More
Image
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 2 Martensite structure at edge of rupture. (×100). More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 45 A typical example of freshly formed martensite at the tip of a failed shear blade. The hardness was 59 to 60 HRC. Etched with 3% nital. 50× More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 21 Cross-sectional view of a white layer of martensite produced by fretting of a carbon steel connecting rod. Axial stress, 0 to 380 MPa (0 to 55 ksi); contact stress, 40 MPa (6 ksi); fretting cycles, 10 5 . Sample was nital etched and viewed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). More