Cast iron bearing caps in tractor engines fractured repeatedly after only short operating periods. The fracture originated in a cast-in groove and ran approximately radially to the shaft axis. The smallest cross section was at the point of fracture. The core structure of the caps consisted of graphite in pearlitic-ferritic matrix. Casting stresses did not play a decisive role because of the simple shape of the pieces that were without substantial cross sectional variations. Two factors exerted an unfavorable effect in addition to comparatively low strength. First, the operating stress was raised locally by the sharp-edged groove, and second, the fracture resistance of the cast iron was lowered at this critical point by the existence of a ferritic bright border. To avoid such damage in the future it was recommended to observe one or more of the following precautions: 1) Eliminate the grooves; 2) Remove the ferritic bright border; 3) Avoid undercooling in the mold and therefore the formation of granular graphite; 4) Inoculate with finely powdered ferrosilicon into the melt for the same purpose; and, 5) Anneal at lower temperature or eliminate subsequent treatment in consideration of the uncomplicated shape of the castings.

Sudden and unexplained bearing cap bolt fractures were experienced with reduced-shank design bolts fabricated from 42 CrMo 4 steel, quenched and tempered to a nominal hardness of 38 to 40 HRC. Fractographic analysis provided evidence favoring stress-corrosion cracking as the operating transgranular fracture failure mechanism. Water containing H7S was subsequently identified as the aggressive environment that precipitated the fractures in the presence of high tensile stress. This environment was generated by the chemical breakdown of the engine oil additive and moisture ingress into the normally sealed bearing cap chamber surrounding the bolt shank. A complete absence of fractures in bolts from one of the two vendors was attributed primarily to surface residual compressive stresses produced on the bolt shank by a finish machining operation after heat treatment. Shot cleaning, with fine cast shot, produced a surface residual compressive stress, which eliminated stress-corrosion fractures under severe laboratory conditions.

A drive-line assembly failed during vehicle testing. The vehicle had traveled 9022 km (5606 mi) before the failure occurred. Both the intact and fractured parts of the assembly were analyzed to determine the cause and sequence of failure. Visual examination of the assembly showed three of four bearing caps, two cap screws, and one universal-joint spider had fractured. Examination of the three fractured bearing caps and the spider showed no evidence of fatigue but showed that fracture occurred in a brittle manner. The bearing cap that was not destroyed still contained portions of the two fractured cap screws. It was found that the two cap screws failed in fatigue under service stresses. The three bearing caps and the universal-joint spider broke in a brittle manner. The properties of the material in the cap screws did not fulfill the specifications. The modified 1035 steel was of insufficient alloy content. Also, the tensile strength and endurance limit were lower than specified and were inadequate for the application. The material for the cap screw was changed from modified 1035 steel to 5140 steel.

On 22 Feb 1997, one of the arms on an amusement park ride became detached from the central pylon, allowing the passenger carriage at the end of the arm to fall to the ground. Detachment of the arm was found to have occurred as a result of fracture of the cast steel bearing cap and the retaining bolt, which then allowed the axle to move out of its housing. The cap material was a cast 0.25% carbon steel. The retaining bolt failed in the threaded region, with no evidence of fatigue. One of the reinforcing straps welded to the outer surface of the cap had also fractured as the result of fatigue. Evidence of a weld repair could be seen at the location of the fracture. The bearing cap, cap 2L, failed by fatigue initiated from the corners of the two threaded holes. One of the two reinforcing straps then failed by overload, while the second one became detached by fracturing through the welds. The bolt then failed by overload. The cracking in cap 2L was not an isolated occurrence. Cracking was detected at the same location in almost all the other caps on the same device. The cracking had been in progress for considerable time. To prevent the reoccurrence of such a failure, recommendations are given for a more-rigorous inspection protocol.