Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
Adhesion
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 165 Search Results for
Adhesion
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.process.c0045926
EISBN: 978-1-62708-235-8
...-phosphorus side of the clad bimetal onto an epoxy film, so that the end product contained nickel-phosphorus sandwiched between copper and epoxy, with a chromate conversion layer on the epoxy side of the nickel-phosphorus. Peel testing showed abnormally low adhesion strength for the bad batch of peel test...
Abstract
A batch of bimetal foil/epoxy laminates was rejected because of poor peel strength. The laminates were manufactured by sintering a nickel/phosphorus powder layer to a copper foil, cleaning, then chromate conversion coating the nickel-phosphorus surface, and laminating the nickel-phosphorus side of the clad bimetal onto an epoxy film, so that the end product contained nickel-phosphorus sandwiched between copper and epoxy, with a chromate conversion layer on the epoxy side of the nickel-phosphorus. Peel testing showed abnormally low adhesion strength for the bad batch of peel test samples. Comparison with normal-strength samples using XPS indicated an 8.8% Na concentration on the surface of the bad sample; the good example contained less than 1% Na on the surface. After 15 min of argon ion etching, depth profiling showed high concentrations of sodium were still evident, indicating that the sodium was present before the chromate conversion treatment was performed. A review of the manufacturing procedures showed that sodium hydroxide was used as a cleaning agent before the chromate conversion coating. Failure cause was that apparently the sodium hydroxide had not been properly removed during water rinsing. Thus, recommendation was to modify that stage in the processing.
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 January 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0006791
EISBN: 978-1-62708-295-2
... Abstract Friction and wear are important when considering the operation and efficiency of components and mechanical systems. Among the different types and mechanisms of wear, adhesive wear is very serious. Adhesion results in a high coefficient of friction as well as in serious damage...
Abstract
Friction and wear are important when considering the operation and efficiency of components and mechanical systems. Among the different types and mechanisms of wear, adhesive wear is very serious. Adhesion results in a high coefficient of friction as well as in serious damage to the contacting surfaces. In extreme cases, it may lead to complete prevention of sliding; as such, adhesive wear represents one of the fundamental causes of failure for most metal sliding contacts, accounting for approximately 70% of typical component failures. This article discusses the mechanism and failure modes of adhesive wear including scoring, scuffing, seizure, and galling, and describes the processes involved in classic laboratory-type and standardized tests for the evaluation of adhesive wear. It includes information on standardized galling tests, twist compression, slider-on-flat-surface, load-scanning, and scratch tests. After a discussion on gear scuffing, information on the material-dependent adhesive wear and factors preventing adhesive wear is provided.
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 5 Adhesive wear mechanisms. (a) Adhesive bonding. (b) Plastic shearing. (c) Fracture-induced formation of third-body particles. Adapted from Ref 25
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 8 Examples of adhesive-type wear caused by inadequate lubrication. (a) Metal pickup on a roller outside diameter from sliding contact on the cage shown in (b). Approximately actual size. (c) The end of the same roller showing the scoring damage from the rolling-sliding contact
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 39 Carburized AMS 6260 steel gear damaged by adhesive wear. (a) Overall view of damaged teeth. (b) Etched end face of the gear showing excessive stock removal from drive faces of teeth
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 12 Adhesive delamination in thermally sprayed Al 2 O 3 coating
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 6 Schematic diagram of the formation of an adhesive transfer particle
More
Image
in Galling Wear on a Steel Inner Cone of a Roller-Bearing Assembly
> ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Failure Modes and Mechanisms
Published: 01 June 2019
Fig. 1 Evidence of galling, or adhesive wear, on the inner surface of a carburized 4720 steel inner cone of a roller bearing. Galling was confirmed by the use of electron probe x-ray microanalysis.
More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 1 Steps leading to adhesive wear. (a) Microjoints. (b) Deformation of asperities and removal of surface films. (c) Shearing and material transfer. Source: Ref 15
More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 2 Example of adhesive wear characterized by excessive material transfer, shown by transferred layers of titanium alloy on a steel surface. Source: Ref 17
More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 4 Schematic diagram of the adhesive transfer process of (a) a thin, flakelike wear particle and (b) a wedgelike wear particle. Numbers indicate generation of slips along the slip planes (how certain “adhesive bond” moves along the contact). First bond is indicated by numbers and the next
More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 39 (a) Typical adhesive wear, plastic deformation, and delamination in the fretting interface. (b) Confirmation of fretting by observing a symmetrical crack pattern propagating toward the inner part of the interface (cylinder-on-flat contact at the gross slip condition)
More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 7 Schematic diagram of the formation of an adhesive transfer particle. (a) Bodies contact. (b) Welded junction forms. (c) Cracks initiate and material breaks away. (d) Debris from one body adheres to the other.
More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 10 Bearing halves failed by adhesive wear resulting from localized overloading after bearing cap shifted position.
More
Image
in Failure Analysis of Gears and Reducers
> Analysis and Prevention of Component and Equipment Failures
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 22 Severe adhesive wear of a mild steel gear
More
Image
in Characterization of Thermosetting Resins and Polymers
> Characterization and Failure Analysis of Plastics
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 22 Thermogravimetric analysis of thermoplastic-thermoset adhesive, 15 °C/min (27 °F/min) in nitrogen. Source: Ref 46
More
Image
in Characterization of Thermosetting Resins and Polymers
> Characterization and Failure Analysis of Plastics
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 23 Isothermal thermogravimetric analysis of thermoplastic-thermoset adhesive. Source: Ref 46
More
Image
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 21 Temperature sweeps on a pressure-sensitive adhesive at various frequencies
More
Image
in Fracture and Fractography of Elastomeric Materials
> Characterization and Failure Analysis of Plastics
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 19 Adhesive failure along left of knit line. Cohesive failure with the rubber at center/right. Continuation of knit line is visible above jagged crack on right.
More
Image
in Fracture and Fractography of Elastomeric Materials
> Characterization and Failure Analysis of Plastics
Published: 15 May 2022
Fig. 20 Adhesive failure of conveyor belt splice
More
1