1-20 of 23 Search Results for

A356

Sort by
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Volume: 1
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1992
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.v01.c9001029
EISBN: 978-1-62708-214-3
... Abstract Two investment-cast A356 aluminum alloy actuators used for handles on passenger doors of commercial aircraft fractured during torquing at less than the design load. Visual examination showed that cracking had occurred through a machined side hole. Fractography revealed that the cracks...
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 20 Dimples in the ductile fracture surface of a permanent mold cast A356 Al-alloy More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 21 Fatigue striations in a cast A356 aluminum alloy. (a) 500×. (b) 1500× More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 60 Dendritic shrinkage porosity in aluminum alloy A356. Shrinkage porosity is a common imperfection in cast components and also a common location for fracture initiation. (a) Fracture surface from a fatigue specimen. 30×. (b) Same specimen as in part (a) but at lower magnification (13 More
Image
Published: 30 August 2021
Fig. 37 Grain refining of A356 alloy by three master alloys. Source: Ref 27 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 60 Dendritic shrinkage porosity in aluminum alloy A356. Shrinkage porosity is a common imperfection in cast components and a common location for fracture initiation. (a) Fracture surface from a fatigue specimen. Original magnification: 30×. (b) Same specimen as in part (a) but at lower More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 23 Correlation between striation spacing and fatigue life of permanent mold cast modified A356 aluminum alloy specimens tested at 0.5% strain amplitude More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 53 Wallner lines (between white arrows) on the fracture surface of an aluminum alloy A356-T6 casting. The black arrow indicates the direction of crack propagation. Source: Ref 20 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 53 Wallner lines (between white arrows) on the fracture surface of an aluminum alloy A356-T6 casting. The black arrow indicates the direction of crack propagation. Source: Ref 23 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2002
Fig. 53 Macroscale brittle torsion fracture in an aluminum-silicon alloy (alloy A356 sand casting). Hardness, 38 HRB; tensile strength, 214 MPa (31 ksi); total elongation, 4%. Source: Ref 42 More
Image
Published: 15 January 2021
Fig. 53 Macroscale brittle torsion fracture in an aluminum-silicon alloy (alloy A356 sand casting). Hardness, 38 HRB; tensile strength, 214 MPa (31 ksi); total elongation, 4%. Source: Ref 43 More
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.process.c9001908
EISBN: 978-1-62708-235-8
..., and shrinkage defects in the castings. Most of the components failed to meet required mechanical properties because of these casting defects. Bombs (weapons) Tailcones Die castings Heat checking Inclusions Shrinkage Porosity A356 UNS A13560 Casting related failures Introduction Component...
Series: ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 2019
DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.power.c0089663
EISBN: 978-1-62708-229-7
... Precipitates Steam turbines ASTM A356 grade 6 UNS J12073 Casting-related failures Mixed-mode fracture When a crack developed in a cast steel steam-turbine casing, a small section of the casing was removed by torch cutting to examine the crack completely and to determine its origin. The crack...
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003536
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
... length through Si particles was observed to be 0.16 in the vertical section fracture profile of a tensile fracture surface of chill cast A356 aluminum alloy having a volume fraction of Si particle equal to 0.074. In this case, as P f is significantly higher than the silicon particle volume fraction...
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 August 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11A.a0006831
EISBN: 978-1-62708-329-4
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003508
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003538
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 15 January 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0006775
EISBN: 978-1-62708-295-2
Series: ASM Handbook
Volume: 11A
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 August 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11A.9781627083294
EISBN: 978-1-62708-329-4
Series: ASM Handbook Archive
Volume: 11
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003516
EISBN: 978-1-62708-180-1