During the pre-test inspection following the stress calculation check on a 7-ton capacity Scotch derrick crane, it was noted that threads on the back stay anchorage bolts were of unusually fine pitch (11 tpi) and that the machined faces of the nuts showed irregular pits or depressions disposed in an annular manner. When sectioned, the nuts showed a surprising method of construction. The nuts for the bolts had been made by using conventional pipe couplings inserted into sleeves made from hexagonal bar and the coupling secured to the sleeve by welding at each outer face. The ends of the sleeve bore were chamfered to form a weld preparation. After welding, the faces were machined which resulted in the removal of most of the weld metal and revealed a pronounced lack of penetration. All bolts used to anchor derrick crane back stays should be designed in accordance with the recommendations of British Standard 327:1964 (Clauses 10 and 18).

While a tower crane was slewing with a full load of concrete at an 80 ft radius, the operator applied the emergency brake to avert collision with another crane. One of the main square tubular uprights split over a short distance and a number of the adjacent bracings had broken away. Additional cracking had developed along one of the corner welds of the upright. Sections taken through the upright in various planes revealed a laminar defect. The through-thickness crack coincided with one end of the defect. The fracture was therefore due to separation having occurred partially in the plane of the defect. This particular tubular bracing was attached initially to virtually half of the section thickness for a little less than half of its circumference and a zone of intrinsic weakness was introduced. In service, fatigue or corrosion fatigue cracks occurred at the toes of the welds, at the corner of the box section and progressively at other positions. Final and sudden failure occurred under the excessively severe torsional stresses introduced when the emergency brake was applied.

The sudden collapse of a tower crane on a building site resulted in severe injuries to the driver. Failure took place at the upper portion of the foundation or lowermost section. The mast sections were constructed from four main corner angles welded to end frames also made from angle sections which were gusseted and fitted with additional doubling plates in the corners where the jointing bolts were fitted. It was evident that the collapse was due to failure of the welds attaching the corner angles to an end frame. Many of the welds at the locations where failure occurred were of poor quality. The corner angles appeared to have been cut slightly shorter than the required dimensions. This was compensated in one case by the use of a weld build-up and in the other three by make-up pieces attached by welds of insignificant dimensions.

A new crane failed during the overload test following erection. A test load of 5 tons at the end of the jib (rated capacity 4 tons) was in the process of being slewed at the time of this failure. Inspection revealed that the collapse had resulted from the opening out of one eye of the rimming steel tie-bar of the main jib at the lower splice. This permitted the pin to pass through and allowed the jib to fall. Examination subsequently revealed that brittle fracture of two of the corner angles of the tower head assembly had also occurred. Had the tie-bar material been of satisfactory quality and/or, if the end that failed had been flamecut instead of sheared, then the damage resulting from the excessive overload would have been limited to yielding of the material in the region of the pin-joint. Such yielding on an overload test further indicated that the scantlings of the pin-joints were inadequate. Two other crane failures showed that failure resulted from the use of rimming steel, and embrittlement of the material was evident.