A CrN coated restrike punch was made of WR-95 (similar to H-11), which was fluidized bed nitrided. The coated punch was used on hot Inconel at about 1040 deg C (1900 deg F). However, a water-soluble graphite coolant was used to maintain the punch temperature at 230 deg C (450 deg F). Visual and binocular inspection at 64+ revealed presence of cracks and complete washout of coating in the working area of the failed punch. Comparison of metallographic cross sections of used and unused punches revealed a significant microstructural transformation in case of the used punch. Presence of a yellow porous layer was clearly evident between the nitrided layer and the coating, in case of the used punch. Cracks were observed to propagate from the outer surface into the bulk. Oxidation was evident along the cracks. The microstructural transformation observed in the case of the used punch was a clear indication of high temperature exposure (due to insufficient cooling) during application. The most probable cause of failure was thermal fatigue.

Extensive slipper/wobbler failures occurred in the integrated drive generators that incorporated TiN coated wobblers, during the production acceptance test. Similar coated wobblers had passed the application tests. The nature of the failure was extensive gouging of the wobbler surface with discoloration and coating removal. The substrate material was E52100 which was through-hardened to HRC 55-60. The slippers that were in contact with the coated wobbler surface were made of AISI 06 material. A synthetic oil was used as the hydraulic fluid in the application. The failure in the wobblers was caused by lack of temperature control during application which resulted in localized surface rehardening. It was established that there was a significant difference in the grade of the hydraulic fluid that was used in the two test programs. Use of superior grade of hydraulic fluid was recommended in this case for the production acceptance tests.

TiN coated back surgery wires were made of Ti-6Al-4V. The reported failure was the presence of pits located in the uncoated area of the wires. The uncoated area of the wire is where the wire is fixtured in the coating chamber during coating. Examination and analysis of the pits using SEM/EDX detection unit revealed significant peaks of B, O, Zr and Fe. Moreover, the shape of the pits was similar to an arc crater. The formation of pits in the wire was caused during coating due to microarcing. A contaminated fixture used during the coating most likely caused the microarcing.