Root-cause analysis and FA work hand-in-hand to identify the source of a problem, gather relevant data, and resolve the issue. However, even experienced professionals can succeed in FA while failing in the outcome. This article explains how to avoid common traps, dead ends, and faulty thought processes in the search for root causes.

This columnn explores the idea that insights into the root cause of increasingly complex failures may be hidden in unanswered questions from past analyses, indicating that there might be more value in previous files than once thought.

Several failure analysis case studies have been conducted over the past few years, illustrating the importance of preserving root-cause evidence by means of artifact-free decapsulation. The findings from three of those studies are presented in this article. In one case, the root cause of failure is chlorine contamination. In another, it is a combination of corrosion and metal migration. The third case involves an EOS failure, the evidence of which was hidden under a layer of carbonized mold compound. In addition to case studies, the article also includes images that compare the results of different decapsulation methods.

Scan-logic diagnosis is used in industry for three main purposes: root-cause analysis, improving manufacturing processes, and improving designs. This article reviews the principles of scan-logic diagnosis and its applications in each of the three areas. It also discusses ongoing challenges and emerging approaches.

This article provides a systematic overview of knowledge-based and machine-learning AI methods and their potential for use in automated testing, defect identification, fault prediction, root cause analysis, and equipment scheduling. It also discusses the role of decision-making rules, image annotations, and ontologies in automated workflows, data sharing, and interoperability.

The ISTFA 2006 panel discussion focused on the integration of test and failure analysis, a topic that was originally addressed at ISTFA 2000. The goal of this year’s panel was to discuss the improvements made to the integration of test and failure analysis and to explore our capabilities for analyzing future technologies.

Diagnostic failure analysis tools provide essential information about where a defect is located and what materials are present, but that information must be combined with other data to establish cause and corrective action. Mistakes made at this stage of the investigation can be extremely costly. This article identifies some of the pitfalls and traps that failure analysts can fall into and explains how to avoid them. It provides three examples of misdiagnosed failures and helps readers to see what led analysts astray.

The tools of the trade in semiconductor failure analysis have advanced rapidly over the past few decades, bringing major improvements in imaging, deprocessing, and materials analysis. In contrast to the progress made in physical FA, little attention has been given to the failure analysis process itself. This article shows through case studies how simple oversights and misunderstandings can lead to costly mistakes. It also defines basic FA concepts and presents a failure analysis sequence, describing each step along with common pitfalls and best practices.

Laser-assisted device alteration (LADA) is an effective tool for identifying speed-limiting paths in ICs. When implemented with a continuous wave laser, it can reveal where the speed-limiting path resides but not when the slow (or fast) logic transition is occurring. To overcome this limitation, an enhanced version of the technique has been developed. This article discusses the capabilities of the new method, called picosecond time-resolved LADA, and explains how it complements the existing failure analysis toolset, facilitating faster resolution of issues and root-cause identification.

This column presents a detailed flowchart for failure analysis.

Thin film anomalies cause many device failures but they are often difficult to see. In this article, the authors explain how they found and identified an 8 to 10 nm film of tantalum causing pin shorts in a majority of ASIC modules from a particular lot. Initial attempts to delayer some of the failed modules resulted in the loss of the failure signal. It was then decided to use a focused ion beam to selectively mill through the interlayer dielectric. During milling, a secondary electron image revealed anomalous material between the fingers of a power transistor, which was subsequently identified as tantalum. Such defects, as the authors explain, are common in damascene processes when materials are not properly removed during etching.

This article is the first in a two-part series analyzing solder connection failures between BGA packages and PCB assemblies. Part I examines failures attributed to oxygen intrusion during reflow, underetched solder resist, and solder paste printing problems. In the latter case, X-ray inspection revealed no abnormalities other than a variation in ball size. To get to the root cause, the corpus of the BGA was progressively ground away, leaving only the balls and an unobstructed view of the PCB surface. A description of the process, supported by detailed images, is included in the article. In Part II, scheduled for the May 2017 issue of EDFA, the author delves deeper into the analysis of voids and presents an alternate FA approach that involves grinding away much of the PCB.

This is the second article in a two-part series investigating solder connection failures associated with BGA packages. Part I, in the February 2017 issue of EDFA, examines various cases of open and short circuit failures, discusses the formation of voids, and explains how to reveal important clues by grinding away the BGA package. Part II continues the analysis of voids and focuses in on failures due to circuit board faults. In such cases, the board is ground away from the backside, stopping just short of the first inner copper layer. The alignment of the two uppermost copper layers, the integrity of microvias, and other potential problems are then examined using polarized light which readily passes through the remaining resin and fibers. As the examples in the article show, this approach can reveal a wide range of manufacturing defects in PCBs.

The failure of a white LED backlight module in a portable computer illustrates the challenges that component and system suppliers must overcome in order to determine root-cause failure mechanisms and take corrective actions that address the problem.

Stress voiding is an insidious IC failure mechanism that can be difficult to identify and arrest. It is of particular concern to those who produce and test ICs with aluminum-alloy interconnects or who assess the reliability of legacy devices with long service life. This article explains how stress voids form and grow and how to determine the root cause by amassing physical evidence and ruling out other failure mechanisms. The key to differentiating stress voiding from other types of failures is recognizing that is the result of three distinct physical phenomena, stress, nucleation, and diffusion, all of which must be confirmed before attempting to make process corrections.

The Electronic Device Failure Analysis Society established the Die-Level Post-Isolation Domain Council to provide an overview of the upcoming challenges in this area and guide technique developments for next-generation analytical tools. This column summarizes the findings of the council in the areas of sample preparation, microscopy, nanoprobing, circuit editing, and scanning probe microscopy. It is a preview of the full roadmap document, which is in preparation to be released to the EDFAS community.

This article discusses the primary differences between electrostatic discharge (ESD) and electrical overstress (EOS) and the circumstances under which they occur. It also explains how to differentiate ESD from EOS during failure analysis and how to avoid common misunderstandings and mistakes.

This column reflects on the emergence of integrated fabless manufacturers (IFMs) in the semiconductor industry and the effect it will have on failure analysis. In the IFM environment, FA will likely play the same roles, as in design debug, qualification, yield, and customer returns, but with new challenges and expectations as explained in this guest column.

This column is part of a series of reports on the findings to date of the EDFAS Failure Analysis Roadmap Councils. The Failure Analysis Future Roadmap Council (FAFRC) is concerned with identifying the longer term needs of the FA community. This article discusses analysis challenges associated with the growing number of elements being incorporated into integrated circuit fabrication. It includes tables summarizing top challenges in front end and package analysis.

The Assembly Analytical Forum (AAF) is an organization under the auspices of the Sematech Quality Council. The AAF charter is to develop Packaging Analytical Roadmaps five to ten years into the future that are consistent with the International Technology Roadmap for semiconductors (ITRS). At ISTFA 2003, the AAF will convene with interested conference attendees to review, edit, and validate a white paper that will quantify critical gaps in the current suite of test, measurement, and characterization tools used in the semiconductor industry and provide recommendations on how to address them. The intent is to update the document biannually and review it in numerous industry venues to ensure its relevancy and utility. This article is somewhat of a preview to the Rev 0 AAF white paper.