This article summarizes the more common analytical techniques for studying ancient metal artifacts, illustrated by case histories. There are two main classifications: noninvasive and invasive techniques. This distinction is of prime importance because some heritage objects may be too rare or valuable for invasive sampling, or there may be ethical objections to certain types of examination. Noninvasive examination of ancient metal artifacts is important, yet it cannot provide the detailed information obtainable from invasive techniques. This is especially true when artifacts contain “hidden” damage and there is also a need for accurate quantitative analyses.

Although stress corrosion cracking (SCC) accounts for just a fraction of all engineering failures, its prevention is a major problem, particularly in the aerospace industry. Recent archaeometallurgical studies show that stress corrosion cracking occurred in ancient metallic artifacts. This article describes investigations that revealed definite evidence for SCC in ancient silver and bronze alloys and a probable case of SCC in low-carat (13K) gold. Diagnostic methods included visual inspection, metallography, and fractography.